Watchman Willie Martin Archive

������������������������������������ PREFACE

From:

"Iron Curtain Over America," by Col. John Beaty we read: "In a small but extremely valuable book, 'The American As He is,' President Nicholas Murray Butler of Columbia University in 1908 called attention to the fact that Christianity in some one of its many forms is a dominant part of the American nature. Butler, then at the zenith of his intellectual power, expressed fear that our capacity to subdue and assimilate the alien elements brought by immigration may soon be exhausted. He concluded accordingly that the dangers which confront America will come, if at all, from within."

Was our Christian country being preserved to the best ability of our presidents? Again from "Iron Curtain Over America":

���� "...after 1880 and particularly in the first two decades of the Twentieth Century, immigration to the United States from Eastern Europe increased rapidly. The Eastern European immigrant Jews brought with them the worn our concept of a Jewish people. Soon these newcomers of nationalist persuasion actually exerted influence over the old and once anti-nationalist organization of American Reform Judaism. In the winter of 1941-'42 the Central Conference of American Rabbis had endorsed the campaign to organize a Jewish Army. The event indicated the capitulation of the leadership of Reform Judaism to Jewish Nationalism. Many American-minded Jews protested, but the voices were disorganized and therefore could be safely ignored. American Jewry had succumbed to the relentless pressure of the Zionists.

���� Since the predominant new Jews consider themselves superior people and a separate nationality ^[1], the assimilation appears not to be out of the question. America now has virtually a nation within the nation, and an aggressive culture-conscious nation at that."

From Col. Beaty's book we learn that the earlier Sephardic Jews in America were demonized by the Ashkenazis in much the same way as Christian conservatives are today, and even more so since the Oklahoma bombing disaster.

Also note that these Ashkenazis were able to organize a Jewish army. Take note also that these same Ashkenazis are at the forefront of demonizing those Christians who are fulfilling their Second Amendment rights for the citizen's militia.

Since our presidents have come from Western European stock and particularity from Britain, their affinity for Freemasonry would most probably be of the English Freemasonry movement.

Thus, the dialectical fight between English Freemasonry and the Grand Orient as portrayed in the book "Scarlet and the Beast" appears to be just that, smoke and mirrors. Albert Pike's "Morals and Dogma" is still the "bible" of both branches.

Albert Pike is adamant about the destruction of Christianity. Is that not the same goal of this "nation within a nation" that Col. Beaty discussed?

It has been estimated that only about one in five thousand Masons realize what is happening. Most are ordinary people and they have no idea that they, too, are being manipulated for a sinister purpose. How much better would everything be if the Masons were taught The Body of Christ instead of The Brotherhood of man!

���� "It is said that history does not repeat itself. That's very foolish. The history of our planet is made up of successive voids and of the ruins that others have strewn about as they each had their turn, and that some have at times regenerated.

���� For the West is empty, even if it has not yet become really aware of it. An extraordinarily inventive civilization, surely the only one capable of meeting the challenges of the third millennium, the West has no soul left. At every level - nations, races, cultures, as well as individuals - it is always the soul that wins the decisive battles. It is only the soul that forms the weave of gold and brass from which the shields that save the strong are fashioned. I can hardly discern any soul in us." ^[2]

That quote from Jean Raspail is so poignant and so true. There is only one reason why our beloved nation has lost its soul. It is because we have given up our close relationship with Jesus Christ.

It was Christianity that forged the European nations out of wilderness; it was Christianity that created the United States. When we collectively allow any belief or system to remove or otherwise deny the Christian principles form our system of government, we will have lost our soul as a nation. That has already been accomplished.

Mainline Christianity in American has become a toothless tiger. It has become masochistic in that the churches seem to be deriving great pleasure in assuming guilt for something for which they are not responsible.

This malady has so completely consumed the once Christian America that the entire fabric of our society has been corrupted. The word malady has two meanings: (1) A sickness of the body and, (2) A moral defect or corruption. Mainline Christianity, and thus America, possesses both definitions.

What is that guilt and how did it develop? Christianity has assumed the responsibility for all of the oppression against the Jews, Blacks and the Hispanics of the world from whatever source, real or imaginary. This has created a situation where a minority portion of society is allowed to do anything it wants with near total impunity while the majority of society suffers in silence and the Christian Churches love to have it so.

This enigma has penetrated every facet of our lives, from the government at the highest level to the discussions in the local coffee shops. The paradox can even be seen in the affairs of the Oklahoma City bombing.

The Apostle Paul said:

"For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God; not selfwilled, not soon angry, not given to wine, no striker, not given to filthy lucre; But a lover of hospitality, a lover of good men, sober, just, holy, temperate; Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers. For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are always liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth." ^[3]

As a people, we Christians of Western European descent, are extremely susceptible to the simplest forms of psychological conditioning. In a message presented several years ago by Earl Jones titled "Changing Evil to Good" in which the classical system of psychological conditioning was explained and who developed it. We will very briefly review that system here because a form of it was used to create this unbelievable guilt with which the Christian West is burdened.

� RACISM, ANTI-SEMITISM: WHAT ARE THEY?

There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" and "Anti-Semitism" in greater horror than does the people in the United States. Compared to other kinds of offenses, it is thought to be somehow more reprehensible, than rape or murder - certainly moreso than the murder of "innocent" unborn babies. The national media and public have become so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and arson, that any but the most spectacular crimes are shrugged off as part of the inevitable texture of American life.

However, "Racism" and "Anti-Semitism" are never shrugged off; for example, when a White Georgetown Law School Student reported in early 1995 that black students were not as qualified as White students, it set off a booming, national controversy about "racism."

If the student had related some statement that the Jews would have considered "Anti-Semitic," and anything or anyone that disagrees with them is labeled as such, the White student would have been crucified and discharged from the school. Or if the student had merely murdered someone he would have attracted far less attention and criticism.

Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities are on full alert for it; newspapers and politicians denounce it; churches preach against it; yet America is said to be racked with it, but just what is racism? Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is meant by the word.

They usually define it as the belief that one's own ethnic stock is superior to others, or as the belief that culture and behavior are rooted in race. When Americans speak of racism they mean a great deal more than this.

Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a clue to understanding what Americans do mean. A peculiarly American meaning derives from the current dogma that all ethnic stocks are equal; despite clear evidence to the contrary. All races have been declared to be equally talented and hard-working, and anyone who questions the dogma is thought to be not merely wrong but evil.

The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important; if blacks, for example, are equal to Whites in every way - what accounts for their poverty, criminality, moral degeneracy and dissipation? Since any theory of racial differences has been outlawed, the only possible explanation for black failure is White Racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone, and dissipated, America must be raced with pervasive racism. Nothing else could be keeping them in such an abject state.

All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic and any explanation for black failure that does not depend on White Wickedness threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of racial differences.

Thus, even if today's Whites can find in their hearts no desire to oppress blacks, yesterday's Whites must have oppressed them. If Whites do not consciously oppress blacks, they must oppress them unconsciously, if no obviously racist individuals can be identified, then social institutions must be racist. Or, since blacks are failing so terribly in America there simply must be millions of White People we do not know about, who are working day and night to keep blacks in misery.

The dogma of racial equality leaves no room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some fashion, an indictment of White People.

The logical consequences of this are clear; since we are "required" to believe that the only explanation for non-White failure is White racism, every time a non-White is poor, commits a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, White Society stands accused of yet another act of racism.

All failure or misbehavior by non-Whites is standing proof that White society is riddled with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-Whites fail to succeed in life at exactly the same level as Whites, Whites will be, by definition, thwarting and oppressing them. This obligatory pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions.

Racism is a sin that is thought to be committed, almost, exclusively by White People. Indeed, a black congressman from Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of Detroit, have argued that only White People can be racist.

Likewise in 1987, the affirmative action officer of the State Insurance Fund of New York issued a company pamphlet in which she explained that ALL Whites are racist and that ONLY Whites can be racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained without flirting with the possibility of racial inequality?

Although some blacks and liberal Whites concede that non-Whites can, perhaps, be racist they invariably add that non-Whites have been forced into it as self-defense because of centuries of White oppression.

What appears to be non-White racism is so understandable and forgivable that it hardly deserves the name. Thus, whether or not an act is called racism depends on the race of the racist. What would surely be called racism when done by Whites is thought to be normal when done by anyone else. The reverse is also true.

Examples of this sort of double standard are so common, it is almost tedious to list them: When a White man kills a black man and uses the word "nigger" while doing so, there is an enormous media uproar and the nation beats its collective breast; but when members of the Black Yahweh cult carry out ritual murders of random Whites, the media are silent. College campuses forbid pejorative statements about non-Whites as "racist," but ignore scurrilous attacks on Whites.

At election time, if 60 percent of the White voters vote for a White candidate, and 95 percent of the black voters vote for a black opponent, it is Whites who are accused of racial bias. There are 107 "historically black" colleges, whose fundamental blackness must be preserved in the name of diversity, but all historically White colleges must be forcibly integrated in the name of...the same thing. To resist would be racist.

"Black Pride" is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but anything that could be construed as an expression of White Pride is a form of hatred. It is perfectly natural for third-world immigrants to expect school instruction and driver's tests in their own languages, whereas for native Americans to ask them to learn English is racist.

Blatant anti-White prejudice, in the form of affirmative action, is now the law of the land; and anything remotely like affirmative action, if practiced in favor of Whites, would be attacked as despicable favoritism. All across the country, black, Hispanic and Asian clubs and caucuses are thought to be fine expressions of ethnic solidarity, but any club or association expressly for Whites is by definition racist.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) campaigns openly for black advantage but is a respected "civil rights" organization. The National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) campaigns merely for equal treatment of all races, but is said to be viciously racist and Anti-Semitic.

At a few college campuses, students opposed to affirmative action laws have set up student unions for White, analogous to those for blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and etc., and have been roundly condemned as racists.

Recently, when the White students at Lowell High School in San Francisco found themselves to be a minority, they asked for a racially exclusive club like the ones that non-Whites have. They were turned down in horror. Indeed, in America today, any club not specifically formed to be a White enclave but whose members simply happen all to be white is branded as racist or Anti-Semitic.

Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the asymmetric quality of American racism is "celebration of diversity." It has begun to dawn on a few people that "diversity" is always achieved at the expense of White (and most of the time White men), and never the other way around. No one proposes that Howard University be made more diverse by admitting Whites, Hispanics, or Asians.

No one ever suggests that National Hispanic University in San Jose, California would benefit from the diversity of having non-Hispanics on campus. No one suggests that the Black Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of the NAACP or the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer from a lack of diversity.

Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them to celebrate "homogeneity." And yet any all-White group, a company, a town, a school, a club, a neighborhood, is thought to suffer from a crippling lack of diversity that must be remedied as quickly as possibly. Only when Whites have been reduced to a minority has "diversity" been achieved.

Let us put it bluntly. To "celebrate" or "embrace" diversity, as we are so often asked to so, is no different from "deploring an excess of Whites." In fact, the entire nation is thought to suffer from an excess of Whites. Our current immigration policies are structured so that approximately 90 percent of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are non-White.

The several million illegal immigrants that enter the country every year are virtually all non-White. It would be racist not to be grateful for this laudable contribution to "diversity." It is, of course, only White nations that are called upon to practice this kind of "diversity." It is almost criminal to imagine a nation of any other race countenancing blatant dispossession of this kind.

What if the people in the United States were pouring its poorest, least educated and most criminal elements across the border into Mexico? Could anyone be fooled into thinking that Mexico was being "culturally enriched?"

What if the state of Chihuahua were losing its majority population to poor Whites who demanded that schools be taught in English, who insisted on celebrating the Fourth of July, who demanded the right to vote even if they weren't citizens, who clamored for "affirmative action" in jobs and schooling?

Would Mexico, or any other non-White nation tolerate this kind of cultural and demographic depredation? Of course not. Yet White Americans are supposed to look upon the flood of Hispanics and Asians entering their country as a priceless cultural gift. They are supposed to "celebrate" their own loss of influence, their own dwindling numbers, their own dispossession, for to do otherwise would be hopelessly racist.

There is another curious asymmetry about American racism. When non-Whites advance their own racial purposes, no one ever accuses them of "hating" another group. Blacks and Jews can join "civil rights" groups and Hispanics can be activists without fear of being branded as bigots and hate mongers. They can agitate openly for racial preferences that can come only at the expense of Whites. They can demand preferential treatment of all kinds without anyone ever suggesting that they are "anti-White."

Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to affirmative action to be called haters. They need only subject racial policies that are clearly prejudicial to themselves to be called racists. Should they actually go so far as to say that they prefer the company of their own kind, that they wish to be left alone to enjoy the fruits of their European heritage, they are irredeemably wicked and hateful.

Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about American race relations: All non-Whites are allowed to prefer the company of their own kind, to think of themselves as groups with interests distinct from those of the whole, and to work openly or group advantage.

None of this is thought to be racist. At the same time, "Whites" must "also" champion the racial interests of non-Whites. They must sacrifice their own future on the altar of "diversity" and cooperate in their own dispossession. They are to encourage, even to subsidize, the displacement of a European people and culture by alien peoples and cultures. To put it in the simplest possible terms, White people are cheerfully to slaughter their own society, to commit racial and cultural suicide. To refuse to do so would be racism.

Of course, the entire non-White enterprise in the United States is perfectly natural and healthy. Nothing could be more natural than to love one's people and to hope that it should flourish. Filipinos and El Salvadorans are doubtless astonished to discover that simply by setting foot in the United States they are entitled to affirmative action preferences over native-born Whites, but can they be blamed for accepting them?

Is it surprising that they should want their languages, their cultures, their brothers and sisters to take possession and put their mark indelibly on the land? If the once-great people of a once-great nation is bent upon self-destruction and is prepared to hand over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for it, why should Mexican, Blacks, Jews and etc., complain?

No, it is the White enterprise in the united States that is unnatural, unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites have let themselves be convinced that it is racist merely to object to dispossession, they have allowed themselves to be convinced that it is natural for their sons and daughters to marry a black, Jew or any other race, other than their own, that it is racist to work for their own interests.

Never in the history of the world has a dominant people thrown open the gates to strangers, and poured out its wealth to aliens. Never before has a people been fooled into thinking that there was virtue or nobility in surrendering its heritage, and giving away to others its place in history.

Of all the races in America, only Whites have been tricked into thinking that a preference for one's own kind is racism. Only Whites are ever told that a love for their own people is somehow "hatred" of others. All healthy people prefer the company of their own kind, and it has nothing to do with hatred. All men love their families more than their neighbors, but this does not mean that they hate their neighbors. Whites who love their racial family need bear no ill will towards non-Whites. They only wish to be left alone to participate in the unfolding of their racial and cultural destinies.

What Whites in America are being asked to do is, therefore, is utterly unnatural; they are being asked to devote themselves to the interests of other races and to ignore the interests of their own kind. This is like asking a man to forsake his own children and love the children of his neighbors, since to do otherwise would be "racist."

What then, is "racism?" It is considerably more than any dictionary is likely to say. It is any opposition of Whites to official policies of racial preference for non-Whites. It is any preference by Whites for their own people and culture. It is resistance by Whites to the idea of becoming a minority people. It is any unwillingness to be pushed aside. It is, in short, any of the normal aspirations of people-hood that have defined nations since the beginning of history; but only so long as the aspirations are those of Whites.

In 1928, Walter Bernays, published a book titled "Propaganda." Walter Bernays was the nephew of Sigmund Freud, the father of modern psychology. In his book, "Propaganda," Walter Bernays discussed how the public mind is manipulated. He wrote:

"The structure of the mechanism which controls the public mind, and how it is manipulated by the special pleader who seeks to create public acceptance for a particular idea or commodity."

He used the words special pleader to refer to any person or organization, public or private, who intends to control the public's mind.

Walter Bernays wrote further,

"Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. Our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. If you can influence the group of leaders, either with or without their conscious cooperation, you automatically influence the group which they sway."

The system is so simple that it is hard to believe that it is so effective but, as was pointed out, we of Western European descent are extremely susceptible to brainwashing. Bernays explains how the system works. His example is specifically directed to developing the public desire for a produce but it can be and is used over and over to mold and direct our lives, individually and nationally.

Continuing with his writing,

"Supposing the public relations man for the Beech-Nut Bacon Company wanted to dramatically increase the sales of bacon to the public. He would suggest to the physicians in the country that they state publicly that it is wholesome to eat bacon. He would show 'proof' to the physicians that this is true. We know as a mathematical certainty that large numbers of persons will follow the advice of their doctors because the public relations man understands the psychological relationship of dependence of men on their physicians."

He continues by explaining the importance of stating to the physicians who the people and organizations are that OPPOSE the idea that bacon is wholesome. That, according to Bernays, is the key to the psychology.

He explained that one should always show that individuals or organizations who are demonized or ridiculed to those opposing the idea that is being planted in the public mind. Kooky scientists, convicted felons, the John Birch Society, the Ku Klux Klan, or Identity Christians were the types he suggested.

It is obvious, he shows, that if people or organizations thought by the public to be evil, or crazy, were those opposing their cause, then the cause itself had to be righteous and true.

The system of controlled psychology as developed by Walter Bernays is the method that is being used to cause mainline Christianity, the government at all levels, the schools and the public at large to apologize and grovel at the feet of a perceived victim where there is no justification.

Applying the lessons learned from Walter Bernay's book "Propaganda" to the system of a double standard now

being seen in all of the Western Christian nations, we can understand why the government acts and reacts as they do.

First, the "beauty and tranquility" of racial togetherness, the brotherhood of man, we must be an example of "democracy" in action, etc., is taught through the schools, churches, service organizations and government.

Then, they must find a person or organization that has beliefs that do not conform to those of the "established" victims of society.

Examples of such beliefs are ethnic separation including dating and intermarriage, government at the lowest level in a true republican form, total freedom of religion (not only those with an approved 501-C3 tax exemption) and allodial owner-ship of land instead of ownership in fief.

These are only a few examples from a list of many. These beliefs are generally lawful (as compared to legal) and they are nearly always Biblically moral.

Then, efforts are made to demonize one or more of such groups by using the full weight and power of the fourth estate, the establishment controlled media (TV, radio, newspapers, magazines and movies). These media outlets are somewhat under the gun, too. If they don't cooperate they lose their license to operate.

Thus, we see why organizations that are determined not to be politically correct are barred from broadcasting. We can see why interviews with such groups are pre-recorded and then edited to "print or broadcast the news that fits." The Waco siege is a good example of this phenomena. The mainline media was invited to the Waco siege by the government for the purpose of propaganda, to show the American people how omnipotent the federal government was. The moment the affair went awry, the media was totally excluded.

After the individual or organization has been thoroughly demonized, an incident is arranged to destroy that individual or organization with the goal of destroying the belief and molding the public at large into compliance.

If we follow Walter Bernay's lessons in his book "Propaganda," we can readily realize that they have been used on our people for nearly 75 years. Only by the strength given to us by God if we ask Him for it, can we resist this terrible onslaught.

The real coup that has brought about this modern double standard has very little, if anything, to do with the Biblical history of the life and death of Jesus nor the tribulations and martyrdom of the early Christians, all of which was brought about by the high priests of the Pharisaical Jewry of that day.

The stories of attacks by the Jews and counterattacks by Christians throughout the past two millennia are well documented.

Continuing to this day most Christians possess a latent mistrust of Jewry and in return the average Jew is wary and as a result has become circumspect, cautious and politic. By the very nature of the American society of ethical values being shared, the two diametrically opposed faiths have obtained a sort of truce.

But that is not the problem causing the current double standard which has all but destroyed our Christian Republic and the Christian Church along with it. The problem of the double standard has been caused by political Zionism. It is a political term and its politics is to control the world. It is accurately estimated that nearly 95 percent of political Zionists who claim to be Jews are actually atheistic and humanistic. They come mainly from the Ashkenazi clan of Khazaria and it is they who instigated and brought about Communism and the U.S.S.R.

But as Paul Gottfried reports in his well written editorial titled

"Why must Christians routinely grovel and apologize for crimes against Jews which they never committed?" ^[4]: "It has respected 'Christian' theologians such as Paul Van Buren, Mary Daley, and Malcom Hay, who took the lead in 'linking' the Holocaust and the New Testament. This practice was common among liberal Christians before it became widespread among Jewish authors. Through Elie Weisel did stress Christian guilt for the Holocaust as early as 1945, that idea played little role in the dominant Jewish interpretations before the seventies...Jewish victimology in the U.S. has coincided with the upsurge of other designated victim movements, black, Hispanic, gay, and feminist, and all have enjoyed the support or at least tolerance of the white majority Christian culture."

Mr. Gottfried reports on the speech delivered before the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith by Ralph Reed of the Christian Coalition.

This speech was reported by the "New York Times" which stated that Reed extended the olive branch to the Christian Coalition's Jewish critics by saying that the Coalition would try harder to overcome "insensitivity to Christian anti-Semitism." The article reported that Reed disavowed any description to America as a Christian Nation. Reed said that describing America as a Christian Nation was blatant wrong and it conjured up for Jews historical memories of the Inquisition and other persecutions.

The "New York Times" article revealed that Ralph Reed criticized Pat Robertson for his statement in his book "The New World Order" wherein he complained of the conspiracy of European bankers against American interests.

The ADL considered Robertson's reference to the European bankers as a veiled attack on Jewish interests. Reed stated, "if one is insensitive to other Jewish concerns, it does not answer these concerns to say 'I'm pro-Israel." Such a statement by the ADL is an admission that European bankers are primarily Jewish. Paul Gottfried very correctly states, "If Christians want to be punching-bags, other will take advantage of the masochism."

Another very pertinent point that Mr. Gottfried made was relative to the double standard,

"Why are all Christians to blame for the Inquisition and Holocaust (whatever that really means), but Jews as such are not to be held responsible for the even larger massacres unleased by Communists in the present century? The Jewish record of excusing and even supporting murderous regimes of the Left is far grimmer than the Christian record of collaboration with Hitler...Why are Foxman and the ADL not required to apologize to the Christian kinsmen of those killed by Communist regimes in which Jews played prominent roles, but American Christians must now atone for every Christian act of intolerance, no matter when it occurred? Why are American Jewish leftists not to be held accountable, as Jews, for the acts of Russian Jewish Communists, even if they defended the Soviet system, but Southern Evangelicals in 1995 must bear responsibility for the unkindness of Spanish Catholics in 1492?"

Another example of this double standard might be cited to make my point clearer.

"For a long time the liberal establishment, Christian and Jewish, pretended that all slave traders were White Christians, which is historically inaccurate. The purveyors of this factoid only grew indignant when blacks implicated Jews specifically in the slave trade. While the first statement is false, the second is at least partially true: Sephardic Jews, such as those who settled in Rhode Island and in the Carolinas, sometimes did make money by trading in slaves. The same was true for Christians and for many African animists."

We have all seen TV articles showing the activities of the militias. They have shown such activities as target practice with their weapons and close-combat training as well as Special Forces type squad training.

In fact, they have disclosed repeatedly that ex-Special Forces personnel are being used as the primary training teams. In each of these TV articles the emphasis is on the supposed illegality of such activities. As we know, even the Congress is now holding hearings on these activities. The militia members interviewed at these hearings have conducted themselves in an exemplary manner.

But what about activities of this type by Jewish organizations? Have there been TV articles and documentaries covering the Camp Jedel operations in the Catskill Mountains in upstate New York? According to articles found in "The Times Herald Record," August 19, 1981; the "Albuquerque Journal," August 29, 1981; the "World News Examiner," August 20, 1982; "Time," August 30, 1971; "New York Sunday Record," August 23, 1981, the Jewish Defense League's activities at this camp are well documented. Notice that these articles are nearly 15 years old. Notice, also, that there has been no government intervention in any way and in fact, the camp is totally ignored.

As found in "The Zionist Terror Network: Background and Operations of the Jewish Defense League" ISBN 0-939484-22-6, "Institute For Historical Review," P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505, we find this description of their activities:

���� "Publicly, both the JDL and Kahane (now deceased) are disavowed by mainstream Jewish organizations in the U.S. However, while Jewish leaders do not generally support the JDL in public many Jews are contributing to the organization. The Jewish Defense League has substantial real estate holdings including a school for terrorists in the Catskills, Camp Jedel, where Allen Goodman, a JDL member who massacred Arab civilians at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem in 1982, received paramilitary instruction.

���� The camp, a former Catskills resort, and another 62-acre site nearby, is surrounded by a metal fence and features a 30-foot watchtower. It is guarded by men armed with semi-automatic AR-15 rifles. Photos of Arab leaders are used for target practice at the training site. Participants are indoctrinated by rabbis who deliver 'highly emotional' speeches, often using a rifle as a prop. Members of both the Israeli armed forces and U.S. Army Special Forces have instructed JDL recruits in military tactics at the camp.

���� The JDL used another paramilitary camp in the hills of California's Texas Canyon, which was under the control of West Coast JDL leader Irving Rubin. League members, including Mordachai Levy, received weapons training here in 1980."

An even more blatant act of the dual standard again deals with militias, paramilitary training and membership in foreign conflicts as mercenaries while holding citizenship in the United States.

The book "The Secret Army" by David J. Bercusson (ISBN 0-99619-035-5, T.H. Best Printing Co. 78 Sullivan St. Toronto, Ontario, describes the manner in which the world Zionist organizations developed the army that fought the Arab-Israeli war of 1948.

The writer relates openly and unabashedly the Zionists efforts within the United States to obtain equipment, weapons, ammunition and all of the rest of the material with which to equip and train an army.

He shows the cooperation, even in the face of laws prohibiting it, obtained from active military officers within our Department of Defense, the State Department, Justice Department and Executive Branch.

Ben Gurion, who later became Israel's Prime Minister, started the process by directing Moshe Shertok, then head of the Jewish Agency's Political Department and their unofficial foreign minister to the united States, to contact General John Hilldring. Hilldring was Assistant Secretary of State at the time. Hilldring was asked for,

"two or three competent American officers who would be prepared to proceed to Palestine and advise on defense arrangements."

Hilldring told Shertok that he would have to go to the "very top," which he did.

Ex-military officers of the United States were allowed to participate in this private army venture. The country we now know as Israel did not exist at that time. This venture was that of a private army; that army was made up of men to include volunteers form Britain, Canada, South Africa and the United States.

To obtain recruits for this private army venture, they used volunteers within the Jewish population to search out and contact Jewish veterans who would be willing to go to Palestine. Synagogues or Jewish community halls were used by speakers to gather support for this operation. Certainly this did not go unnoticed by the United States Department of Justice but nothing was done to stop it.

The Jewish community knew that what they were doing was unlawful in the United States. They used cryptic forms of communication to keep the average American citizen in ignorance in the event someone decided to contest their actions. Section 10 of the United States Criminal Code prohibited;

"Enlisting or entering into the service of any foreign prince, state, colony, district, or people as a soldier, or as a marine, or seaman on board of any shop of war, letter or marque, or privateer."

Within the FBI there were some men who could not be bought. They knew of the operation and tried to stop it, with some success, but only for a while. There were individuals within the Passport Section of the State Department who also tried to block this activity but they, too, met with only partial success.

What this meant was that our government at the top was not demanding that the recruitment for a private army within the United States cease. Contrast this with the current hysteria over militias, anti-terrorism, gun regulation and confiscation and with emphasis made on those who teach the American people our need to return to a Christian Republic.

The great conflict between East and West, Left-Wing and Right-Wing, "Judeo-Christian" Zionism and genuine Christian Republicanism continues to rage. With some fear of oversimplification, the struggles of today can be reduced to that great conflict.

Samuel Francis wrote an article titled: "The Real Extremists Are Still On The Left." That article can be found in the May 18, 1995 issue of the newspaper "The Wanderer":

���� "If FBI Director Louis Freeh is looking for some extremist group to investigate, he need look no further than the hat-and-violence-drenched movement in the Southwestern United States that pushes for open immigration and demands return of the southwest to Mexico. Long before right-wing militias began mobilizing in reaction against gun control, far-left Hispanic activists were soaking themselves in violent rhetoric that makes the militias sound like the Little League.

���� Last year, not long after the passage of California's Proposition 187, a radical Hispanic group calling itself the 'Mexican Movement for National Liberation' put out a statement that let us know what it thinks about the effort to remove illegal immigrants from the welfare rolls. Proposition 187 'is a declaration of war against the Mexican people in the militarily occupied northern half of our Mexican nation,' it proclaimed.

���� The statement went on to accuse the 'europeans' (note the lower-case spelling) of 'genocide against our people' for the last 400 years, but White Americans and American institutions are the special targets of their hatred. 'The local police departments are nothing more than glorified armies of occupation in our barrios, colonials, and homeland. Their attempts at selective assassinations have failed to intimidate us. In a version of low intensity warfare, they have attempted to destroy our political movements.'

���� Proposition 187, the statement screams, 'is a wake-up call to resist by any and all means,' and it calls for creating 'the revolutionary clandestine formations that will defend our people and lead to our ultimate national liberation struggle and socialist reunification of Mexico.' It ends with a call to 'create the conditions for Mexican Intifada.'

���� Lest you imagine that this and similar statements represent merely a loony fringe, understand that this one was published in a tabloid newspaper put out by another group, 'People Against Racist Terror' (PART), that helped organize mass demonstrations against 187 in Los Angeles only days before the real citizens of the state overwhelmingly passed the resolution. PART's rhetoric duplicates that of the Mexican 'liberation' group, comparing the U.S. Government to Nazi Germany.

���� Curiously also, the newspaper anticipates the fevered witch-hunt rhetoric of the mainstream media in the last few weeks in trying to link the populist right with the Oklahoma City Bombing. Thus, it attacks anti-abortion activists, the religious right, Second Amendment supporters, and the militia movement, among others. Fringe such groups may be, but point is that they're the ones active among Hispanics in the southwest.

���� But don't bet your camouflage the FBI is looking at this movement, with its not-too-subtle incitement of violence and guerrilla warfare. What the bureau actually did during the 187 controversy was harass law-abiding supports of the resolution.

���� Thus, three days before the vote on 187, one of its coauthors, Barbara Coe, received a little visit rom the FBI. Assistant Attorney General Deval Patrick defends the agents by claiming they were just interested in whether leaflets Mrs. Coe had recently distributed about illegal voting by aliens had violated voters' civil rights. But Mrs. Coe says the agents repeatedly asked if the leaflets had been designed or distributed by the Republican Party. Just a little visit to let her know Big Brother was watching.

���� Another little visit was paid to yet another citizen, Horacio Grana, who legally immigrated from Mexico and who supported 187. After the federal judge blocked the successful ballot measure in a court ruling, Grana wrote to the judge objecting to the ruling and giving his name and address. A few days later, U.S. Marshals showed up to quiz him about it. 'I told them I have the right to freedom of speech,' Grana says. 'They had a very bad attitude with me. It was like Gestapo tactics.'

���� President Clinton leapt at the chance to blame his political critics on the right for the Oklahoma City atrocity, and the federal leviathan wasted no time investigating law abiding supporters of immigration reform, but no one cares that left-wing extremist Hispanic activists have long openly called for violence and insurrection and pushed for the disintegration of the country. If this is an example of what the President means by 'counter-terrorism,' it makes you wonder if maybe the militias don't have a point."

That is an excellent example of the double standard with reference to the Hispanics being the victim and the White-Anglo-Saxon-Protestant-Male (WASPM) being the evil ones.

Another example of this phenomena of a dual standard between the government decreed victims at the hands of the WASPM's comes from an article written by Clark Corey, title "America Must Move."

It was published in the August 1995 issue of Media Bypass Magazine:

���� "Americans need to compare the evil of the Rodney-King devastation in which media and government manipulated a minor arrest into a holocaust far worse than Oklahoma. A wife-beating felon violating parole, drunk and high on PCP, ran from police, endangering untold lives and property. King assaulted a Highway Patrol officer into pulling a gun on him and his life perhaps was saved by the arrival of L.A. police. He favored them with obscene gestures, threw off their 'swarm' like puppies, and rose from two Taserings with a savage attack on the police. It was shoot or use batons to bring him to submission.

���� Neutral lawyers (actually partial to the media) reported that the unmanipulated video did show police pausing frequently to observe whether King would submit to cuffing, and they admitted 'reasonable force.' King's medical report read: 'PCP, minor lacerations;' he had fallen on his face twice when Tasered.

���� King was a powerful, prison-phsiqued, drug-mad felon, no 'innocent motorist.' More lies; it wasn't a lily-white Simi jury but a Ventura County jury that had four blacks, until dumped for NAACP fingering.

���� It was evil, smear-America, renegadism that brought a trial against the police instead of King, after they had brought in a drug-empowered monster, who repeatedly attacked police with only minor lacerations.

���� But that racist renegade injustice is minor compared with what was coming. From the time of the arrest until the non-guilty verdict was announced, the media and the government kept, as by a conspiracy, nearly all information from the public, except the tail-end of a manipulated video, some 20 seconds which they ran over and over. The public was led to believe that the officers were tried for 'excessive force,' (the indictment was for a preposterous charge next to murder) a falsehood reinforced by rerunning the false video. Thus, when the not-guilty verdict came, it was like a bomb, Pearl Harbor all over; an air-head feminist was shown demanding to know, 'You mean what I saw didn't happen?'

���� The Black Mayor rushed on TV, 'express our outrage!' And they were prepared, as if forewarned. Burn, baby burn! From TV copters, 'Over this way!' Most fun since Watergate, because it all could be charged to racist America. 'Beaten into insensitivity!' from Sam Donaldson. 'Miscarriage of justice!'

���� Nothing but lies and hatred. There were many more bloody and battered bodies, though fewer actual deaths, than in Oklahoma. But instead of showing them over and over in all their gore, we were shown 'happy looters,' criminal thugs telling America, 'victims of society.' Police who had endangered their lives to bring in unhurt an attacking monster were 'animals;' while brutes who took the head of an innocent passerby into their hands and beat it to mush were victims of America and of a disease, 'riot mentality.'

���� The evil of the media and of the government was the as-if-planned conversion of a common arrest into a block-buster of hate America and trial-by-jury outmoded and denigrated. To top it off, renegades in Washington stepped in, ordering a 'civil rights' trial in L.A. where there would be no neutral observers. Then again into the press stepped Janet Reno, ordering tougher sentences like Stalin overruling Vyshinsky.

���� Stalinist Angela Davis, who supplied the guns for the bloody assault on the Marin Courthouse in 1970, has now been honored with a Presidential Chair at the University of California, with a six-figure salary, plus a $30,000 annual stipend, plus coveted assistants and space, to teach nihilism and hate America...

���� And it was just back in the 70s when Court and Congress gave orders and passed laws blocking all monitoring, record keeping, or surveillance of communist or their renegade groups, even those teaching and preparing violent assaults on our society. The jury in Waco rejected all serious charges against the surviving and destitute Davidians, declaring stoutly that it was the government that should have been on trial, but their decision was simply reversed, by a Federal Judge!

���� Only understanding can bring a powerful motivation. This evil did not start in 1990; it has deep roots. By the early 1900s, John Dewey and helpers began socializing education-transforming it from that needed by a self-governing people to that required by clients to the State. A little later Morris Cohen of Harvard, and son of Felix were teaching 'socialized law,' 'judicial legislation' would empower judges to overturn all laws and Constitution, in the name of the Constitution and the success of Hitler is presented as proof. Franklin Roosevelt knew by 9 a.m. December 7, 1941, that bombs would start falling on Pearl Harbor by 1 p.m. so he got out his stamp collection.

���� Arthur Schlesinger has admitted as much and he has recognized that the only real question is why did he do it. The answer is, to save socialism (communism), it was certainly not to save anything else. In 1963, John Kennedy was led for months by a 'Get Diem,' to move the war along. Ho Chi Minh had been in tentative settlement with Diem's brother since July. This was used as an excuse to hurry the Vietnam general's coup along, eventually forced by cutting support for their armies. With Diem gone, the whole structure of the South collapsed, as had been warned, and then the renegades declared the war unwinable, then criminal, then America was criminal. The war became madness."

The dual standard is seen in so many aspects of modern American society. The dual standard which has been shown in the efforts of the Office of Special Investigations (OSI), an official branch of the Department of Justice is clearly evident. Repeatedly their so-called Nazi hunters have dug up innocent people and hounded them literally to death or to the shame and hardship of expulsion from this country.

Karl Linnas and his family lived under extreme pressures form the OSI and finally were expelled to Russia where he was ruthlessly killed in Leningrad. Feodor Fedorenko was deported and executed on behalf of the OSI in Russia and it was all based on manipulated and erroneous information, to keep the holocaust lie alive and well; so the Zionists could fleece Americans of more billions of dollars.

Mykola Kowalchuk of Philadelphia was harassed, intimidated, coerced, threatened, fired from his jobs, consistent demonstrations in front of his home, windows broken, etc. He and his family suffered for 17 years. Then the U.S. District Court dismissed the case for lack of evidence. Derge Kowalchuk, Mykolas' brother suffered the same fate.

This man underwent a civil proceeding and was denaturalized. He, too, was innocent of OSI charges. Arthur Rudolph was the top Rocket engine scientist working for the U.S. space effort. It was he who was responsible for the Saturn V engine design.

After his work was finished OSI harassed an intimidated him until he had to leave for Germany. He was cleared of all charges after a two year investigation in that country. Andrija Artukovic was a man dying from Alzheimers disease and sclerosis of the brain. He was extradited to Yugoslavia based on false accusations. He died there in that country.

It is reported that Alan Dershowitz, one of the lawyers for O.J. Simpson, publicly stated that;

"John Demajanjuk should die whether he is innocent or guilty, because he is Ukrainian."

We should all recall the mass slaughter of the Ukrainian people by the Jewish Bolsheviks. By deliberate starvation somewhere between 3 and 7 million Ukrainian people died by deliberately confiscating the vast harvest of grain that these people produced.

This tragedy is accurately revealed in a documentary titled "The Ukrainian Famine. Harvest of Despair." That film should be shown in every Christian Church in America but it is not because of the dual standard.

The reasons for this are easy to understand if we, as Christian Americans, will only think rationally instead of emotionally. Perhaps this can be best shown by extracting from an editorial found in "Ameirch Focus, Commentaries on America."

���� "America: Submerged in a Sea of Zionism. Will history remember America merely as a major captive nation of Zionist world conquest, ignoring the lustrous ascendance and near triumph of the glorious potential of free man? Will Zionist scorched-earth shots to the heart of all that is wholesome buy them their long-sought victory for Babylonian humanism with its showy irreverence and the glorification of all that is sordid? Will all of the goodness, wholesomeness and productivity of our unique Christian Republic, which millions forfeited their lives to give us, be purged from the world, leaving man to enter the 21st century enslaved to the least of God's creations? Must Americans forever witness Zionist self-promotion and self-portrayal as our best and brightest, as our most deserving and selfless citizens suffering a society of lesser humans with intellectually inferior pursuits? Will God allow animal cunning, arrogance, greed and self-aggrandizement a final victory over humanity?

���� With 'political correctness' based upon Zionist fascism in the ascendance, with the American media system largely a Zionist tool, with Foundations and Zionist Political Action Committees spreading legislative dollars and providing selected candidates massive financial support, with two parties and political commentary dominated by the Zionist International, can traditional Americans hope to reverse the current course of history? Can we develop a formula to reclaim our Republic and the tools of a productive society, recapturing or rebuilding the essence of a nation one deservedly the noble and gracious leader of the world's nations?

���� Can we collectively observe that our governmental processes are captive to Zionist appointees at every level, that our State, Treasury and Commerce Departments as well as the Presidency are operated by Zionists who take their order from Zionism? Can we perceive that almost all of the national information-flow reaches us only through a Zionist filter and pro-Israel/Zionist propaganda machine? Have we not discovered the demise of education, the growth and development of crime, the decay of our cities and our rapid decline as a united people have happened concurrent with the intrusion of Zionists and Zionism into the American system? Have we not noticed that today it is increasingly difficult for ordinary people, Jew or Christian, White, Black, Yellow or Brown, to live together in 'live and let live' affection and respect, as the ADL the ACLU and the AIPAC attack society's pillars, move to destroy the Christian history of America and indoctrinate our children with ideas and philosophies that most of the world holds to be reprehensible, society-destructive, and beyond civility? Have we not noticed the fear in our church bodies, the manipulation of them to amend and mutate the teaching of Jesus' word to men?

���� Here we have history's master victimizers, representing themselves as the victims, as betrayed and sinned against, demeaned and tormented because of society's jealousy; a colony of Culicidae (insects such as mosquitoes and gnats) decrying the occasional angry slap by those that have been stung. We observe the creators of much of man's sordid and duplicitous record artfully and deceitfully altering, amending, abridging and censoring the record to point the finger of responsibility to others, begging society's pity and solace for pain suggested to have been shared by no other people and never publicly recognizing, though surely perceiving, that it has been their centuries-long manipulation of their fellow man and their self-ordination as gods that has cause the animosity they correctly sense.

���� Consider an alien system with such a firm hold on American policy mechanisms that they are capable of having American citizenship granted overnight to one of Zionism's most energetic employees and then have him named as American ambassador to his former employer nation and confirmed without a word from our 'illustrious Senate,' including that great defender of American interests, Mr. Jesse Helms? And consider a President's cabinet with 80% Jewish Zionist members and a President, himself a Rhodes Scholar (but unable to finish at Oxford) and a member of the Zionist International; a Trilateralist, Bilderberg secret communist.

���� Consider an alien philosophy carefully scheming to own and control America's newspaper and broadcasting systems, then combining its now massive propaganda and reinstruc-tional capabilities with the movie, entertainment and documentary producers of Hollywood, in short order reducing life to drugs and sexual fantasies and living to a succession of mindless escapades and romps in the hay; surely and continuously changing Americans then America...finally creating such irresponsible and chaotic conditions in our lives that we then welcome massive regulation, police restraints and New World Order socialist oppression just to get order again; forget morality or social ethics, productivity or national focus.

���� Consider the raw source of energy and money for the pro-abortion and homosexual lifestyle movements, the illegal immigration madness, loss of personal heritage identity, multi-cultural disarray and the move to make our precious English subordinate to the first choice of everyone's original homeland language. These are funded, not by the grassroots but by single source money...given in every case to reduce our influential Christian nation to helplessness; Babylonians filled with hate for the Christian people who bade them welcome, spending enormous effort and endless dollars to destroy our once wholesome influence on an ugly world. Witness the altered state of church in America; intimidated, compromised, fearful and spiritless. Are they winning? Look and listen to the new mores of our changed society. Consider which nation is our number one recipient of 'loans' and aid. Note that they take what they want from our military arsenal and then without apology copy and sell it around the world, wherever money is to be made or counties subverted. Note their demand for U.N. (American) troops to clear away the enemy which surrounds their homeland and as stalking horses for their political influence thought the world. From the Pentagon, State, Presidency or the United Nations, their influence and numbers overwhelm any possible opposition and America increasingly does what they demand of us.

���� And then, dear friends, we have just witnessed once again their absolute mastery over our financial affairs. They own Banking, Investment Banking, the control of every major corporation, of course the 'Fed' and control of the Treasury of the United States. As we have just seen in Mexico, they do as they please, manipulating conditions, loaning then withdrawing support capital and grasping control of the resources of nations one by one, sometimes for profit but always for control. And then there is the depreciating dollar and Americans and the humble Mexicans are about to be enslaved by its demise.

���� When we add thought-control (political correctness) emanating from our college campuses and the continuous flow of Marxist ideas from Zionist professors to the 'hate crimes' laws and the massive effort to close down unwelcome publishers and Republican ideas, we can see that our Zionist fascist New World Order elitists have left no scheme destructive of Christian freedom left unutilized.

���� Consider then the 'we-are-in-charge' arrogance of the 'Justice' department's 92 Waco murders, followed by official lies and media cover-up, to be followed by massive raids on the citizens' militias that resulted...and national martial law, orchestrated and controlled by our Zionist fascist President in collaboration with the ADL.

���� Finally, we can watch with dismay as black-shirted, hooded world police power is deployed in America, computer programs are prepared for our personal control and prisons are readied for any who would underscore their First Amendment rights by using them. And huge funds of propaganda and money are expended to take from us our last hope of freedom; the Second Amendment and our guns.

���� And 90% of Americans haven't a hint, a clue. So brainwashed are they that when push comes to shove, most of them will unknowingly side with this enemy. So we who perceive must do the work of thousands."

Our citizens need only to start thinking rationally instead of emotionally. Our Christian brothers and sisters must start demanding that Biblical Christian principles be taught from behind the pulpit.

The greatness of our Christian heritage and its heroes must be emphasized instead of the groveling at the feet of thee "Culicidae." As history has repeatedly proven the teaching of Jesus:

"But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves." ^[5]

Our fathers were truly great warriors as we can clearly see in the following:

"These be the names of the mighty men whom David had: The Tachmonite that sat in the seat, chief among the captains; the same was Adino the Eznite: he lift up his spear against eight hundred, whom he slew at one time. And after him was Eleazar the son of Dodo the Ahohite, one of the three mighty men with David, when they defied the Philistines that were there gathered together to battle, and the men of Israel were gone away: He arose, and smote the Philistines until his hand was weary, and his hand clave unto the sword: and the Lord wrought a great victory that day; and the people returned after him only to spoil. And after him was Shammah the son of Agee the Hararite. And the Philistines were gathered together into a troop, where was a piece of ground full of lentiles: and the people fled from the Philistines. But he stood in the midst of the ground, and defended it, and slew the Philistines: and the Lord wrought a great victory. And three of the thirty chief went down, and came to David in the harvest time unto the cave of Adullam: and the troop of the Philistines pitched in the valley of Rephaim. And David was then in an hold, and the garrison of the Philistines was then in Bethlehem. And David longed, and said, Oh that one would give me drink of the water of the well of Bethlehem, which is by the gate! And THE THREE MIGHTY MEN BRAKE THROUGH THE HOST OF THE PHILISTINES, and drew water out of the well of Bethlehem, that was by the gate, and took it, and brought it to David: nevertheless he would not drink thereof, but poured it out unto the Lord. And he said, Be it far from me, O Lord, that I should do this: is not this the blood of the men that went in jeopardy of their lives? therefore he would not drink it. These things did these three mighty men." ^[6]

It will not be long until the Zionist Jews have reduced all the Mexican people to slave status, and they will be working day and night for peanuts; and if they resist they will be slaughtered. Such is the destiny of the Mexican people. The Blacks have been introduced to AIDS thanks to Jewish Scientists in government.

����������� THE JEWS PLANTED AIDS VIRUS

The Jews planted the AIDS Virus in Vaccine at the U.N. World Health Organization to weaken and conquer the U.S. Most Americans know by now that there is no known cure for AIDS. Some of our medical men frankly state that there will never be a cure, except by isolation. They have found that the AIDS virus is so small ‑ IT CAN PASS THROUGH A CONDOM. And so strong ‑ it can live six hours on a kitchen table!

But the most amazing news is that doctors have discovered that the AIDS' virus WAS PREPARED ESPECIALLY FOR ‑ THE AFRICAN BLACK MAN by Jewish Communist agents working as scientists for the World Health Organization [They are trough with the Blacks, (and they intend to keep the Mexicans under control as well) as they have served their purpose in destroying Civil Rights and other laws they did not like in America.

The Blacks never suspecting their role as they worked tirelessly for equality, they never, and still do not, realize; that instead of getting what they most wanted, the Blacks were instead losing ground until, today their condition in life has not become better - BUT HAS STEADILY GROWN WORSE.

Therefore the so-called Black leaders like Jessie Jackson and the Rev. Sharp will lead them to total destruction like a Judas Goat, for it is now time to remove them because they are becoming increasingly harder to handle]. They decided that our conquest by AIDS would be easier and more effective than a nuclear holocaust.

Dr. William Campbell Douglass, an M.D. wrote an article for the September issue of "Health Freedom News," the journal of the National Health Federation entitled:

"WHO MURDERED AFRICA"

This is not a question. It's a statement. WHO, the World Health Organization, murdered Africa with the AIDS virus. Dr. Doubtless continues: Other suspects, the homosexuals, the green monkey and the Haiti and, WERE ONLY PAWNS IN THIS VIRICIDAL ATTACK ON THE NON‑COMMUNIST WORLD.

Many viruses grow in animals and many grow in humans, but most of the viruses that affect animals don't affect humans. THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS, SUCH AS YELLOW FEVER AND SMALLPOX. The World Health Organization, in published articles, called for scientists to work with these deadly agents AND ATTEMPT TO MAKE A HYBRID VIRUS THAT WOULD BE DEADLY TO THE BLACK MAN. ^[7] In the bulletin of the World Health Organization (WHO), Volume 47, pp. 251, 1972, they said,

"AN ATTEMPT SHOULD BE� MADE TO SEE IF VIRUSES CAN IN FACT EXERT SELECTIVE EFFECTS ON IMMUNE FUNCTION. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired IF THE INFECTING VIRUS DAMAGES, more or less selectively, THE CELL RESPONDING TO THE VIRUS."

That's AIDS. What the WHO is saying in plain English is,

"Let's cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T‑cell system of man, an ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY."

Why would anyone wish to do this? If you destroy the T‑cell System of man, you destroy man. Is it even remotely possible that the World Health Organization would want to develop a virus that WOULD WIPE OUT THE BLACK RACE? If their new virus creation worked, the WHO stated, then many terrible and fatal infectious viruses could be made even MORE terrible and MORE MALIGNANT. Does this strike you as being a peculiar goal for a HEALTH organization?

What about the green monkey? Some of the best virologists in the world and many of those directly involved in AIDS research, such as Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier, have said that the green monkey may be the culprit.

You know the story: A green monkey bit a native on the rump and, bam ‑‑ AIDS all over Central Africa.

There is a fatal flaw here. Gallo, Montagnier and these other virologists know that the AIDS virus doesn't occur naturally in monkeys.

IN FACT, IT DOES NOT OCCUR NATURALLY IN ANY ANIMAL! AIDS STARTED practically SIMULTANEOUSLY in the United States, Haiti, Brazil, and Central Africa. One would wonder ‑ was the green monkey a jet pilot? Examination of the gene structure of the green monkey cells proves that IT IS NOT GENETICALLY POSSIBLE to transfer AIDS virus from monkeys to man by natural means.

Dr. Theodore Strecker's research indicates that the National Cancer Institute in collaboration with the World Health Organization made the AIDS virus in their laboratories at Ft. Detrick (now NCI).

They combined the deadly retroviruses, bovine leukemia virus and sheep visna virus, and injected them into human tissue cultures. The result was the AIDS virus, the first human retrovirus known to man AND NOW BELIEVED TO BE 100% FATAL TO THOSE INFECTED.

The momentous plague that the world now faces was anticipated by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in 1974 when they recommended that,

"Scientists throughout the world join with the members of this committee in voluntarily deferring experiments (linking) animal viruses."

What the NAS is saying in carefully‑guarded English is:

"FOR GOD'S SAKE, STOP THIS MADNESS!"

Now that we've let the green monkey off the hook. How about the Communists {read that International Zionist Jews}? Well the Communists are saying AIDS is a "capitalist plot."

This should make you suspicious because, as any student of the Jewish conspiracy knows, THEY ALWAYS BLAME OTHERS FOR WHAT THEY ARE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING. And what they are doing is CONDUCTING GERM WARFARE FROM FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND, AGAINST THE FREE WORLD, ESPECIALLY THE UNITED STATES, even using foreign Communist agents within the United States Army's germ warfare unit euphemistically called the Army Infectious Disease Unit.

Carlton Gajdusek, an NIH executive at Fort Detrick, admits it:

"In the facility I have a building WHERE MORE COMMUNIST SCIENTISTS FROM THE U.S.S.R. and MAINLAND CHINA WORK (with full passkeys to all the laboratories) than there are AMERICANS. Even the Army's Infectious Disease Unit is loaded with foreign workers, not always friendly nationals."

Can you imagine that? A United Nations ‑ WHO Communist Trojan horse in OUR biological warfare center. There is absolutely no doubt that the creations of the AIDS virus by the WHO was not just a scientific exercise that got out of hand.

It was a cold‑blooded, diabolical, successful attempt to create a killer virus that was then used in a successful experiment in Africa. SO SUCCESSFUL THAT MOST OF CENTRAL AFRICA MAY BE WIPED OUT, 75,000,000 DEAD WITHIN the next 5‑10 years. It was NOT AN ACCIDENT. IT WAS DELIBERATE. In the Federation Proceedings of the United States in 1972, WHO said:

"In the relation to the immune response A NUMBER OF USEFUL EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES CAN BE VISUALIZED."

They suggested that a neat way to do this would be to put their new killer virus (AIDS) into a vaccination program, sit back and observe the results. "THIS WOULD BE PARTICULARLY INFORMATIVE IN SIBSHIPS," they said.

That is, GIVE THE AIDS virus TO BROTHERS and SISTERS and see if they die, who dies first and of what, just like using rats in a laboratory.

THEY USED SMALLPOX VACCINE FOR THEIR VEHICLE and the geographical sites chosen in 1972 were Uganda and other African states, Haiti, Brazil and Japan.

Dr. Strecker pointed out that even if the African green monkey could transmit AIDS to humans, the present known amount of infection in Africa makes it STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for a single episode, such as a monkey biting someone on the butt, to have brought this epidemic to the point it currently is. THE DOUBLING TIME OF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INFECTED, about every 14 months, when correlated with the first known case, and the present known number of cases, prove beyond a doubt that a large NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAD TO HAVE BEEN INFECTED AT THE SAME TIME.

From 1972 to 1987 is 15 years. In 15 years, FROM A SINGLE SOURCE OF INFECTION there would be about 8,000 cases in Africa, not 75‑million. We are approaching World War II mortality statistics.

Dr. Theodore A. Strecker is the courageous doctor who unraveled this conundrum, THE GREATEST MURDER MYSTERY OF ALL TIME. He should get the Nobel Prize, but he'll be lucky not to be "suicided with a heart attack or accident of some sort."����

Strecker has found that THE AIDS EPIDEMIC WILL IN ALL PROBABILITY EVENTUALLY BANKRUPT THE NATION'S MEDICAL SYSTEM.

He became fascinated with the peculiar scientific anomalies concerning AIDS that kept cropping up.

Why did "experts" keep talking about green monkeys and homosexuals being the culprits when it was obvious that the AIDS virus was a man‑made virus? Why did they say that it was a homosexual and drug‑user disease when in Africa it was obviously a heterosexual disease?

If the green monkey did it, then WHY DID AIDS EXPLODE practically simultaneously IN AFRICA, HAITI, BRAZIL, THE UNITED STATES and SOUTHERN JAPAN? [It performed in this way: BECAUSE IT WAS DELIBERATELY PLANTED, TO DESTROY A PEOPLE WHO HAS BECOME TO DANGEROUS TO BE ALLOWED TO LIVE.]

As early as 1970 the World Health Organization was growing deadly sheep and bovine viruses in human tissue cultures. Cedric Mims said in a published article in 1981 that THERE WAS A BOVINE VIRUS CONTAMINATING THE CULTURE MEDIA OF THE WHO. Was this an accident? If it was an accident, why did WHO continue to use the vaccine?

This viral and genetic death bomb, AIDS, was finally produced in 1974. It was given to monkeys, and they died of pneumocystis carni, which is typical of AIDS. Dr. R.J. Biggar said in Lancet: "...The AIDS agent...COULD NOT HAVE ORIGINATED DE NOVO." That means it didn't come out of thin air. AIDS WAS ENGINEERED IN A LABORATORY BY VIROLOGISTS.

There are 9,000 TO THE FOURTH POWER possible AIDS viruses. There are 9,000 base pairs on the genome. So the fun has just begun.

Some will cause brain rot similar to the sheep virus, some leukemia‑like diseases from the cow virus, and some that won't do anything. So the virus will be constantly changing and trying out new esoteric diseases hapless man. We're only at the beginning.

Because of the trillions of possible genetic combinations, there will never be a vaccine. If they could develop a vaccine, they would undoubtedly give us something equally bad as they did with the polio vaccine ‑ cancer of the brain, the swine flu vaccine ‑ a polio‑like disease, the smallpox vaccine (AIDS), and the hepatitis vaccine (AIDS).

THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME the virologists have brought us disaster. SV‑40 from monkey cell cultures contaminated polio cultures.

Most people in their 40's are now carrying this virus through contaminated polio inoculations given in the early 60s. It is known to cause brain cancer, which explains the increase in this disease that has been observed in the past ten years.

This is the origin of the green monkey theory. The polio vaccine was grown on green monkey kidney cells. DESPITE THE FACT THAT POLIO WAS RAPIDLY DISAPPEARING WITHOUT ANY MEDICAL INTERVENTION, 64‑million Americans were vaccinated with SV‑40 contaminated vaccine in the 60s, producing an increase in cancer of the brain.

Primary multifocal leukoencpha-lopathy (PML), brain rot, has been added to the burden of homosexuals who HAVE BEEN GIVEN AIDS THROUGH HEPATITIS‑B VACCINE.

The AIDS virus didn't exist in the United States before 1978, What happened in 1978 to cause AIDS to burst upon the scene and devastate the homosexual and Black segments of our population? IT WAS THE INTRODUCTION OF THE HEPATITIS‑B VACCINE WHICH EXHIBITS THE EXACT EPIDEMIOLOGY OF AIDS.

A Doctor W. Schmugner, born in Poland and educated in Russia, came to this country in 1969. BY AN UNEXPLAINED PROCESS, HE BECAME HEAD OF THE NEW YORK CITY BLOOD BANK. How does a RUSSIAN‑TRAINED doctor become head of one of the largest blood banks in the world?

Doesn't that strike you as peculiar? He set up the rules for the hepatitis vaccine studies. Only males between the ages of 20 and 40, WHO WERE NOT MONOGAMOUS, would be allowed to participate in this study. CAN YOU THINK OF ANY REASON, OTHER THAN THE DESIRE TO SPREAD SOMETHING AMONG THE POPULATION, FOR INSISTING THAT ALL EXPERIMENTEES BE PROMISCUOUS?

Schmugner is now dead and his diabolical secret went with him. The hepatitis vaccine, unlike the AIDS vaccine, was not grown from human tissue culture. So accidental contamination didn't occur. THE AIDS VIRUS WAS PUT IN THE VACCINE DELIBERATELY. IT WAS NO MISTAKE. IT AFFECTS, ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY, QUEERS, NEGROES, JEWS and MIXED BREEDS.

The Center for Disease Control reported in 1981 that four percent of those receiving the hepatitis‑vaccine were AIDS‑ infected. IN 1984 THEY ADMITTED TO 60%. Now they refuse to give out figures at all because THEY DON'T WANT TO ADMIT THAT� 100% OF HEPATITIS VACCINE RECEIVERS ARE INFECTED WITH AIDS. Where is the data on the hepatitis vaccine studies? FDA? CDC? No, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS IT BURIED WHERE YOU WILL NEVER SEE IT. ^[8]

����������������������������������� Chapter One

���� PROOF THE JEWS ARE NOT ISRAELITES

Near the time of Christ, there once existed a metropolis city, which was a trade center for the then known world. This city of wealth was once destroyed in 146 B.C., and its treasures carried off to Rome. But Julius Caesar restored it a hundred years later, and the Roman colony flourished so much that it soon became one of the most prominent centers in Greece. Some would say that in the 2nd century it was the richest city in Greece.

This city was a city of wealth, of luxury and of immorality. It seemed to have one quality that marked it as a commercial hot spot of its day, for it is said that "Jews flocked to it." That city was ancient Corinth, the chief city in the Roman Province of Achaia. This is the city that Paul spent at least a year and one-half preaching the Gospel and encountering the full force and fury of the "Jews."

Times does not seem to change much do they? The same problem is facing most of the major cities in America today. The commercial cities we have in the United States are fast becoming breeding cesspools of corruption and all manner of evil. Could this be caused by a "Jewish" society and their influence? Many wonder!

Strong's Concordance more or less defines the words "Jew" and "Jews" as: "in the sense of a country, i.e., a Judean." The word "Jew" is used 22 times in the King James Version of the Bible in the New Testament, and the word "Jews" is used 172 times and 170 times of those are from the same #2453 as the above "Jew" definition. There are another 6 times the plural word "Jews'" is used and all but one of these is this #2454. So for the 200 times, the words: "Jew, Jews, and Jews'" are used in the New Testament, at least 197 occasions are referring to a Judean in the sense of from a place, i.e., as from a country.

The question still haunts many and they have often asked just who are these people the Bible calls "Jew, Jews, and Jews'"? Why were these people not just simply called "Judeans," "Israelites," or "Judeans whose religion was Judaism?" This is the age old word problem of society problem that is surrounded with so many, many, lies and deceptions. "The fear of the Jews" syndrome that plagues society today. Much of it as a result of the so-called holocaust which we have been told 10,000 times 10,000 that the Germans cremated 6-million Jews during WWII.

This story has installed a guilt complex in the American people, until the word Jew has become a non speakable word, and if one dares to utter the word except in reverence and humility they will be attacked by both Jews and Christians. Therefore, we have prepared this study to prove to you and any other thinking American that the bulk of these people called "Jew" or "Jews" in the Bible, were not and are not of the House of Israel or of the House of Judah.

Then who are these people who have plagued the pages of history for so, so very long? The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia defines "Jew" as the same word of Strong's #2453 in the following words:

"'Jew' denotes originally an inhabitant of Judah ^[9], but later the meaning was extended to embrace all descendants of Abraham." ^[10]

The question which faces us here is WHO had the authority and the power that: "extended the meaning to embrace all descendants of Abraham?" Mr. Orr goes on to say in his definition that: "'Jews' (always pl.) is the familiar term for Israelites in the Gospel (esp. in John), Acts, Eph. etc."

This definition only serves to confuse the issue even more, who, how, when and why was such confusion entered into society and the Holy Scriptures? Why, if the term "Jew," refers to Israelites, did they not just simply call them Israelites or Judeans, whose religion was Hebrew?

����������������������������������� Chapter Two

��������������� ORIGIN OF THE WORD "JEW"

It is an incontestible fact that the word "Jew" did not come into existence until the year 1775. Prior to 1775 the word "Jew" did not exist in any language on earth. The word "Jew" was introduced into the English language for the first time in the 18th century when Sheridan used it in his play "The Rivals," Chapter 2, p. 1,

"She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the beard of a Jew."

Prior to this use of the word "Jew" the word "Jew" hand not become a word. Contrary to what most people believe Shakespeare never saw the word "Jew" nor did he ever use the word "Jew" in any of his works, the common general belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his "Merchant of Venice," V, III, i, 61, Shakespeare wrote as follows "what is the reason? I am a Iewe; hath not a Iewe eyes?" You see there was not even a letter "j" or "J" until the middle of the 18th century. Check any encyclopedia you wish for proof of this.

In the Latin Jerome 4th century Vulgate Edition of the New Testament Jesus is referred to by the Genitive Plural of "Iudaeus" in the Gospel by John reference to the inscription on the Cross, "Iudaeorum." It was in the 4th century that Jerome translated into Latin the manuscripts of the New Testament from the original languages in which they were written. This translation by Jerome is referred to still today, as the Vulgate Edition by the Roman Catholic Church authorities, who use it today.

Jesus is referred to as a so-called "Jew" for the first time in the New Testament in the 18th century editions in the English language of the 14th century first translations of the New Testament into English. The history of the origin of the word "Jew" in the English language leaves no doubt that the 18th century "Jew" is the 18th century contracted and corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin "Iudaeus" found in Jerome's Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no longer any doubt.

The available original manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century accurately trace the origin and give the complete history of the word "Jew" in the English language. In these manuscripts are to be found all the many earlier English equivalents extending through the 14 centuries from the 4th to the 18th century.

From the Latin "Iudaeus" to the English "Jew" these English forms included successively: "Gyu," "Giu," "Iu," "Iuu," "Iuw," "Ieuu," "Ieuy," "Iwe," "Iow," "Iewe," "Ieue," "Iue," "Ive," "Iew," and then finally the 18th century, "Jew." The many earlier English equivalents for "Jews" through the 14 centuries are "Giwis," "Giws," "Gyues," "Gywes," "Giwes," "Geus," "Iuys," "Iows," "Iouis," "Iews," and then also finally in the 18th century, "Jews."

With the rapidly expanding use in England in the 18th century for the first time in history of the greatly improved printing presses unlimited quantities of the New Testament were printed. These revised 18th century editions of the earlier 14th century first translations into the English language were then widely distributed throughout England the English speaking world among families who had never possessed a copy of the New Testament in any language.

In these 18th century editions with revisions the word "Jew" appeared for the first time in any English translations. The word "Jew" as it was used in the 18th century editions has since continued in use in all the editions of the New Testament in the English language. The use of the word "Jew" was thus stabilized.

The best known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims (Douai) Edition and the King James Authorized Edition.

The Rheims (Douai) translation of the New Testament into English was first printed in 1582 but the word "Jew" DID NOT APPEAR IN IT.

The King James Authorized translation of the New Testament into English was begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The word "Jew" did not appear in it either. The word "Jew" appeared in both these well known editions in their 18th century revised versions for the first times.

Countless copies of the revised 18th century editions of the Rheims (Douai) and the King James translations of the New Testament into English were distributed to the clergy and the laity throughout the English speaking world. They did not know the history of the origin of the English word "Jew" nor did they care.

They accepted the English word "Jew" as the only and as the accepted form of the Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek "Ioudaios." How could they be expected to have known otherwise? The answer is they could not and they did not. It was a NEW English word to them.

When one studies Latin they are taught that the letter "I" in Latin when used as the first letter in a word is pronounced like the letter "Y" in English when it is the first letter in the words like "yes," "youth" and "yacht." The "I" in "Iudaeus" is pronounced like the "Y" in "yes," "youth," and "yacht" in English. In all the 4th century to 18th century forms for the 18th century "Jew" the letter "I" was pronounced like the English "Y" in "yes," "young," and "yacht." The same is true of the "Gi" or the "Gy" when it was used in the place of the letter "I."

The present pronunciation of the word "Jew" in modern English is a development of recent times. In the English language today the "J" in "Jew" is pronounced like the "J" in the English "justice," "jolly," and "jump." This is the case only since the 18th century. Prior to the 18th century the "J" in "Jew" was pronounced exactly like the "Y" in the English "yes," "youth," and "yacht." Until the 18th century and perhaps even later than the 18th century the word "Jew" in English was pronounced like the English "you" or "hew," and the word "Jews" like "youse" or "hews." The present pronunciation of "Jew" in English is a new pronunciation acquired after the 18th century.

The German language still retains the Latin original pronunciation. The German "Jude" is the German equivalent of the English "Jew." The "J" in the German "Jude" is pronounced exactly like the English "Y" in "yes," "youth," and "yacht."

The German "J" is the equivalent of the Latin "I" and both are pronounced exactly like the English "Y" in "yes," "youth," and "yacht." The German "Jude" is virtually the first syllable of the Latin "Iudaeus" and is pronounced exactly like it. The German "Jude" is the German contraction and corruption of the Latin "Iudaeus" just as the English "Jew" is the contraction and corruption of the Latin "Iudaeus."

The German "J" is always pronounced like the English "Y" in "yes," "youth," and "yacht" when it is the first letter of a word. The pronunciation of the "J" in German "Jude" is not an exception to the pronunciation of the "J" in German.

The earliest version of the New Testament in English from the Latin Vulgate Edition is the Wiclif, or Wickliff Edition published in 1380.

In the Wiclif Edition Jesus is there mentioned as One of the "iewes." That was the 14th century English version of the Latin "Iudaeus" and was pronounced "hew-weeze," in the plural, and "iewe" pronounced "hew-wee" in the singular.

In the 1380 Wiclif Edition in English the Gospel by John XIX.19, reads "ihesus of Nazareth kyng of the iewes." Prior to the 14th century the English language adopted the Anglo-Saxon "kyng" together with many other Anglo-Saxon words in place of the Latin "rex" and the Greek "basileus." The Anglo-Saxon also meant "tribal leader."

In the Tyndale Edition of the New Testament in English published in 1525 Jesus was likewise described as One of the "Iewes."

In the Coverdale Edition published in 1535 Jesus was also described as One of the "Iewes." In the Coverdale Edition the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads "Iesus of Nazareth, kynge of the Iewes." In the Cranner Edition published in 1539 Jesus was again described as One of the "Iewes."

In the Geneva Edition published in 1540-1557 Jesus was also described as One of the "Iewes." In the Rheims Edition published in 1582 Jesus was described as One of the "Ievves." In the King James Edition published in 1604-1611 also known as the Authorized Version Jesus� was described again as one of the "Iewes." The forms of the Latin "Iudaeus" were used which were current at the time these translations were made.

The translation into English of the Gospel by John, XIX.19, from the Greek in which it was originally written reads "Do not inscribe 'the monarch of the Judeans' but that He Himself said 'I am monarch.'"

In the original Greek manuscript the Greek "basileus" appears for "monarch" in the English and the Greek "Ioudaios" appears for "Judeans" in the English. "Ioudaia" in Greek is "Judea" in English. "Ioudaios" in Greek is "Judeans" in English. There is no reason for any confusion.

If the generally accepted understanding today of the English "Jew" and "Judean" conveyed the identical implications, inferences and innuendoes as both rightly should, it would make no difference which of these two words was used when referring to Jesus in the New Testament or elsewhere.

But the implications, inferences, and innuendoes today conveyed by these two words are as different as black is from white. The word "Jew" today is never regarded as a synonym for "Judean" nor is "Judean" regarded as a synonym for "Jew."

When the word "Jew" was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was "Judean."

However during the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well-financed international "pressure group" created a so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" among the English speaking peoples of the world. This so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word "Jew."

It is a misrepresentation presented to the world deliberately by this well organized and well financed "pressure group" to deceive Christians. ^[11] (And to claim a heritage that is not theirs).

This sure seems to be the more correct terminology. It appears from all our readings that the Jews of all ages, always do best what their father, the devil does - and that is lie. ^[12]

The Greek words used for "know and knowledge" seem to carry somewhat of a different context or concept than todays English words do. In both the Hebrew and Greek tongue these words carried the connotation - "to know fully."

"Knowledge strictly is the apprehension by the mind of some fact or truth in accordance with its real nature...Knowledge is distinguished from 'opinion' by its greater certainty. The mind is constituted with the capacity for knowledge, and the desire to possess and increase it. The character of knowledge varies with its object. The senses give knowledge of outward appearances; the intellect connects and reasons about these appearances, and arrives at general laws or truths; moral truth is apprehended through the power inherently possessed by men of distinguishing right and wrong in the light of moral principles; spiritual sympathy...The highest knowledge possible to man is the knowledge of God, and while there is that in God's infinity which transcends man's power of comprehension, God is knowable in the measure in which He has revealed Himself in creation, and supremely in Jesus Christ who alone perfectly knows the Father, and reveals Him to man..." ^[13]

The problem with knowledge is that it can "enlarge" a man's ego. St. Paul, who is said to have authored the book of 1st Corinthians, penned these words in the 8th Chapter verses 1 and 2:

"...we know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth. And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know."

In these passages, Paul was addressing, primarily, the pagan ritual of things offered to idols and their influence upon Christian fellowship with the heathen community, but the concepts of knowledge are for general application. Paul shows that a conceited knowledge is not a good thing.

But the man who understands that love is for more important than knowledge has a handle on "knowing" and the limits contained therein. True love for you neighbor {fellow Israelite} has a real concern that consults the interest of others.

There can be found a common evidence of ignorance in a person and that evidence is a conceit of knowledge. That is why Paul said,

"if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing as yet he ought to know."

Many believe that Paul used these words here, because of the arrogance and forcefulness of the Jews, whose religion was Judaism {Traditions of the Elders - at that time in history} and their attitudes towards the "goyium," i.e., White Israelites. These Jews always want to be in control and more or less run the show.

The person who knows most, is the one who best understands his own ignorance and the imperfections of human knowledge. The vain and conceited person, that "thinks" he knows everything, is drunk on his own imagination, a real Jewish trait.

He should examine himself to see if he really knows any thing alright. It surely is one thing to know truth and another thing to know truth as it ought to be known. When truth is known alright it will duly improve our knowledge. For God said: "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge {why?} BECAUSE THOU {you} HAST{have} REJECTED KNOWLEDGE {therefore God will}, I will also reject thee..." ^[14]

The man or woman who truly knows the YHWH of True Israel are taught and guided into knowing truth aright, and so must the living of his/her life accordingly. The man or woman who has a vain and conceited opinion of him/herself is impeding the leadership and/or guidance of the Holy Spirit. This kind of knowledge can not be bought or sold. True wisdom does not come from books or personal experience, but rather from YHWH, His son and His Holy spirit.

If the "Jew" word problem and society problem had never been introduced into society things might have been different, but it is there, it is a real live issue of today, for you and I. We have to obtain truth aright from Scripture, history, both secular and Biblical, and from letting the Holy Spirit guide us into all truth, see John 14. "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." ^[15]

Now, let us return to the wicked, commercial and immoral city of Corinth, that according to scholars, "Jews flocked to this trade center." ^[16] In Acts 18 we find that Paul encountered the Jewish problem first hand.

�� 1). There were some Jews (and/or Judeans) there, along����������� with some Greeks.

�� 2). Paul reasoned with them, some opposed him and���������������� blasphemed and he said their blood would be on their��������� heads.

�� 3). Some Judeans believed in Christ. Jews lived among������������� Israelites and Greeks in Corinth.

�� 4). Upset Jews rose up in insurrection against Paul in��������������� strife.

�� 5). The Jews instilled fear and silence in Corinthians,��������������� making them afraid to speak the truth.

�� 6). The deceived Jews (Judeans) had to have a teacher������������� (Paul) to show a more perfect knowledge of YHWH����������� and Christ.

���� 7). Apparently all Jews did not worship God.

���� 8). Paul is accused by Jews before the Roman court.

���� 9). The court cleared Paul of any wrong.

��� 10). The Jews took their contempt out on another person.

There are many people who live in Texas and are called Texans. But all these Texans are not of the same race, region, or religion. There are some True Israelites (Hebrews) in Texas. We are sure that there are some Jewish Texans also. How can one tell one from the other.

There is probably no way one can, unless, they tell you who they are or what they are or we can see their fruits which produce evidence. If a person is asked if he is Jewish or an Israelites, we feel that a true Israelite would tell all he knows about his religion. But Jews, back then and even today, are almost always afraid of the truth. John 8:44 says that the father of the Jews is the devil and a liar. Apparently the real nature (part of the definition of know, supra) of the Jew is trickery, deception and lies. True Israelites know that it is wrong to lie instinctively.

���������������������������������� Chapter Three

WHO ARE THE PHARISEES -- and ARE THE "JEWS" ISRAEL?

The children of the promise are the literal descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, whereas the children of the flesh are children from other unions such as the descendants of Ishmael and Esau. It also dealt with the genealogies of Christ and the Pharisees and it was concluded that the Pharisees at the time of Christ, like Ishmael and Esau, while of the seed of Abraham, were not children of the promise.

If the Pharisees, who were also called Jews, WERE NOT CHILDREN OF THE PROMISE, who then is a Jew and who is an Israelite? We will save the subject of Israelites for another publication and just deal with Pharisees and Jews.

However, this story begins with Abraham, who had eight children: Isaac from Sarah; Ishmael from the handmaiden Hagar; and six other from Keturah. Of all these children only one child became the child of the promise and that was Isaac. Isaac only had two children: twin boys named Esau and Jacob.

But again, only one child was the child of the promise and that was Jacob. Later God would change his name to Israel. Jacob/Israel had twelve sons from two wives and two handmaidens and each of these sons, as descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, became children of the promise ^[17].

At this time we are only interested in one of those sons named Judah. Judah had five sons, two of whom God killed, but only two of the remaining three were children of the promise.

Throughout Biblical history there have been numerous conflicts between the children of the flesh born in juxtaposition to children of the promise, and some are listed below:

���� Abel vs. Cain;

���� Shem vs. Ham (Canaan);

Isaac vs. Ishmael;

Israel vs. Moabites/Ammonites (Lot's children);

Jacob vs. Esau/Edomites;

Israel vs. Amalakites, and

Pharez and Zerah vs. Shelahites.

These conflicts between the children of the Promise and the children of the Flesh are later described in Scripture as being conflicts between the good seed and the tares.

Scripture records a strange story in the events surrounding the births of each of these children. Without getting into a lengthy discussion, Cain and Abel were born subsequent to the fall and of course Cain slew Abel; Canaanites were cursed because Ham uncovered the nakedness of his father, yet Noah cursed Canaan - not Ham; Moabites/Ammonites due to an incestuous relationship between Lot and his two daughters; Esau is recorded as fighting with his twin brother Jacob in the womb of his mother; Amalakites {of Esau} from the relationship between a concubine and Esau's son born of Esau's Hittite wife; and Shelah born of a Canaanite wife of Judah.

THE SHELAH CONNECTION

To understand that the Pharisees at the time of Christ and those of Jewry in the 20th century are at least partial descendants of the children of the flesh, we must go back and begin with Judah, Jacob's 4th son of Leah and his descendants. The story of Judah's marriage and descendants is recorded in Genesis, Chapter 38.

Genesis, Chapter 37 ends with Joseph being sold into Egypt and the story of Joseph starts again in Chapter 39. It is both interesting and strange that Chapter 38 should be placed at this particular place in the Scriptures about a subject totally unrelated to the former and latter chapters.

We are told in verse 1 that Judah "went down from his brethren." This appears to have been an act of poor judgement such as later Dinah exhibited and was raped due to her poor judgement. We are not told the reason for Judah's poor judgement but it begins the history of conflict between Judah and his brothers which will continue till the later separation of the nation into the House of Israel and the House of Judah.

Judah, being separated from his family ties, could and did fall prey to the women in the land who were not his kinsmen according to the flesh. We are told that Judah:

"...saw there a daughter of a certain Canaanite, whose name was Shuah; and he took her, and went in unto her." ^[18]

This connection was contrary to the will of God and Judah should have known better from his upbringing if not the example of his fathers. His indiscretion or poor judgement in forming an alliance with the people in the land was a crime that produced bastard children.

If this bastardization of Israel was to continue the chosen people would soon be assimilated into surrounding heathenism and would no longer be God's chosen people. Thus we see the necessity for God to separate His people from these heathen peoples.

In any event Judah took a Canaanite for a wife and had three bastard sons {sons born from mixed seed}: Er, Onan, and Shelah. We say bastard sons because in the Old Testament a bastard was a child born from a mixed marriage with an Israelite and another race ^[19]. When the time came that Er, Judah's eldest son, was to have a wife, Judah obtained for him a woman named Tamar.

We are not told how or why, but Er was "wicked in the sight of the Lord" ^[20] and the Lord slew him. We are not told what this wickedness was but the word used here also means evil and mischief and these definitions lead many to believe this evil had something to do with the law. Being raised by his Canaanite mother, he would have become indoctrinated in the ways of the pagan Canaanites - not the ways of the Lord.

According to the law, Onan, Er's younger brother, had to marry Tamar and raise up seed to his elder brother, Er. However, Onan was wicked also, and refused to do this, spilling his seed on the ground ^[21].

This was probably because of the threat of losing the inheritance {that is, he would be raising up seed for his brother}, again, possibly from the training he received from his Canaanite mother. In any event, God also slew Onan. Once again, according to the law Tamar should have been given to the third son, Shelah, that he might raise up sons for his elder brother.

However, by this time Judah must have been just a little bit concerned. After all, Tamar had already been the wife of two of his sons and both had been killed by the Lord. Thus it is easy to understand his reluctance. Scripture tells us that Judah told Tamar to wait until Shelah was older; however, when he got older Judah failed or refused to give Tamar to Shelah. Tamar waited and waited but Shelah eventually took another for a wife, apparently with his father's blessing.

It is recorded in the 45th chapter of the book of Jasher that Tamar was a daughter from the genealogy of Elam, the son of Shem. That she was a daughter of Shem makes sense in view of what Judah said when he found out she was pregnant with child. Scripture records that it was reported to Judah that:

"Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt." ^[22]

Stoning was the normal mode of capital punishment at that time in history - death by fire was not the normal procedure used to execute someone. Therefore it is significant that Judah pronounced death by burning for that was reserved for priests' daughters who brought disgrace upon the sacred office. The law states:

"And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire." ^[23]

Since Judah pronounced death by fire we are able to conclude that she must have been the daughter of a priest. However, one would think that if she was, she should be aware of the law prohibiting mixed marriages. But perhaps that was not the case.

Tamar could have been imported from another geographical area as was Rebecca for Isaac. Thus at the time of her arrival and marriage to Er and Onan she could have been unaware of the covenant God had made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel.

Not being aware of the covenant she would not know that the two men she married were half Canaanite and half Israelite and not legitimate heirs to the promise. By the time Shelah had taken another wife, Tamar was probably educated in the covenant relationship with God and realized that even if she was given to Shelah, any sons from that union would not produce a bloodline heir.

This is about the only logical reason for her to play the harlot, entrapping Judah to become the father of her children (Pharez and Zerah) at the risk of being put to fiery death. It would also partially explain Judah's response when he found out that he was the father and stated:

"She is more righteous than I; forasmuch as I gave her not to Shelah my son." ^[24]

Although Judah may not have totally understood or admitted that his marriage to a Canaanite was in violation of the law, he is, at least, acknowledging that Tamar should have been the mother of children of the birthright. He must have understood this birthright problem sooner or later, as the scepter was not passed to Shelah, Judah's third and only surviving son from Shuah, but to Judah's firstborn son from Tamar who was named Pharez. This is evidenced by the fact that Pharez's name appears in the genealogies of Christ in Matthew 1:3 and Luke 3:23.

The union of Judah with Tamar produced the twin births of Pharez and Zerah, and once again Judah had three sons: 1). Shelah, who was a bastard {1/2 Canaanite & 1/2 of Judah} by his Canaanite wife; 2). Pharez; and 3). Zerah, the latter two both from Tamar. Pharez and Zerah being the sons of Judah, the son of Jacob/Israel, and Tamar the daughter of the genealogy of Shem, were full-blooded Israelites even though they were born out of wedlock. The whole story is recorded in Genesis 38.

These births produced three descendant liens from Judah which will be called Pharez-Judah, Zerah-Judah, and Shelah-Judah.

The question now becomes, what happened to the three descendants of Judah: Pharez, Zerah and Shelah? It will simply be stated at this point in the study that Pharez and Zerah were children of the promise whereas Shelah was a child of the flesh and destined to become the father of the Pharisees. This study will not be concerned with Pharez and Zerah - only the family of Shelah will be addressed.

���������������������������� SHELAH-JUDAH

We need to keep in mind the fact that a strict genealogy was kept on each tribe. Even though Shelah was a bastard son of Judah, his genealogy is given in Scripture and his descendants can be traced to the city of Elath. In Chronicles it is recorded:

"The sons of Judah; Er, and Onan, and Shelah: which three were born unto him of the daughter of Shua the Canaanite. And Er, the firstborn of Judah, was evil in the sight of the LORD; and he slew him. And Tamar his daughter in law bare him Pharez and Zerah. All the sons of Judah were five. The sons of Pharez; Hezron, and Hamul. And the sons of Zerah; Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara: five of them in all. And the sons of Carmi; Achar, the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed. And the sons of Ethan; Azariah." ^[25]

Verse 3 is unusual, as once a name is dropped from the promised seed line it usually does not appear in later genealogies. For example the descendants of Cain do not appear in the genealogies of Adam in Genesis, Chapter 5, or Matthew 1 or Luke 3.

It is difficult to determine exactly when the Book of Chronicles was written, however verse 1 of chapter 9 states:

"So all Israel were reckoned by genealogies; and, behold, they were written in the book of the kings of Israel and Judah, who were carried away to Babylon for their transgression." ^[26]

Since the first 8 chapters deal with the genealogies of Adam to this statement in verse 1 of chapter 9, which refers to the Babylonian captivity, it seems apparent that this portion of Chronicles was not recorded until sometime after the Babylonian captivity (600 B.C.) - perhaps by Ezra or Nehemiah.

Again, all o Judah's sons must be important or they would not be recorded in Scripture, especially since the descendants of Shelah were not children of the promise. It should be noted that verses 5 and 6 list the descendants of Pharez and Zerah, and verse 8 begins with Ethan, a son of Zerah. What is missing here are the sons of Shelah. But verse 7 seems to be completely out of place as it lists the genealogy of a person named "Carmi."

Carmi is not one of the five sons of Judah, nor is he listed in the Genealogies of Pharez or Zerah. The name also appears in 1 Chronicles 4:1, but it is still unclear whose son he was. However, it is most interesting that his son "Achar" is referred to as "the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed." {You can read the story about the thing accursed in Joshua 6:18} While it appears impossible to prove it, it is suggested that "Carmi" and his son "Achar," the troubler of Israel, were in the genealogy of Shelah.

We mentioned that these names were also listed in Chronicles, chapter 4, as follows:

"The sons of Shelah the son of Judah were, Er the father of Lecah, and Laadah the father of Maresbah, and the families of the house of them that wrought fine linen, of the house of Ashbea, And Jokim, and the men of Chozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had the dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. And these are ancient things. These were the potters, and those that dwelt among plants and hedges; thee they dwell with the king for his work." ^[27]

Again there is no mention of "Carmi" nor his son "Achar," but her we do have a reference to these descendants of Shelah being "men of Chozeba." Chozeba was a town in southwestern Judah and is also the town of Chezib of Genesis 38:5 and Achzib of Joshua 15:44.

The words Chezib, Achzib or Chozeba mean "lying," "deceptive," "disappointing," or "failing." It is also interesting that Shelah-Judah was born in Chezib ^[28] and it appears that his descendants centuries later inherited this same city.

In Joshua we find that:

"This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah by their families; even to the border of Edom the wilderness of Zin southward was the utter most part of the south coast. And Keilab, and Achzib, and Mareshah; nine cities with their villages." ^[29]

Thus we see that the town of "Achzib" was given to some descendants of Judah. Achzib or Chozeba was located in the valley of Elath. ELATH WAS IN OLD EDOM in the valley of Elath and north of Adullum. The word "Adullum" should ring a bell as that was the place where Judah went down from his brothers and took a Canaanite for a wife. This was on the extreme southern border of the Southern Kingdom of Judah at the northern end of the Gulf of Aquabah.

In fact most scholars seem to be in agreement that this area was actually outside the land inherited by Judah. This would make some sense as we know that a bastard could not even enter the congregation, even unto the tenth generation ^[30]; therefore it would also make sense that these Shelahites, being bastards, could not inherit land belonging to the children of the promise. But this does not mean that they could not be given land on the southern border of Judah.

The city of Elath was next to Ezion-geber, which would later become Solomon's seaport. Remember now that these Shelahites are 1/2 Canaanite, and the word Canaanite is defined in Strong's Concordance as merchants and traders. Doesn't it seem logical that merchants and traders would congregate in the cities, and especially in and around a busy seaport where they could engage in trade, commerce, and industry?

There is another reference to this city named "Achzib" in the Book of Micah where it states:

"The house of Achzib shall be a lie to the kings of Israel." ^[31]

Is it just a coincidence that Shelah was born at "Chezib" which is basically the same word as Achzib? Is it coincidence that the word "Achzib" so closely resembles and has the same meaning as "Achar," the troubler of Israel? Remember these words mean "lying," "deceptive," "disappointing," or "falling." Was it not a lie that Shelah was a true child of the promise? Would not their existence next to and/or as a part of Israel make any claim they would make as being a descendant of Abraham ^[32], entitled to receive the promises, a lie or at the least a clever deception?

JEWS FROM ELATH

Elath or Eloth was a part of the land of Edom belonging to the descendants of Esau who were called Edomites an later Idumeans. Apparently Elath and Ezion-geber came under the control of Israel in 1040 B.C. by David's conquest of Edom as recorded in 2 Samuel 8:13-14.

This land is also mentioned as being under the rule of Solomon in approximately 1000 B.C. ^[33] The land passed back into Edomite control in 890 B.C. during the days of Jehoarm, king of Judah ^[34]. 80 years later in 810 B.C., the city of Elath was rebuilt under the kingship of Azariah or Uszziah ^[35].

This historical background brings us to the time of the "Jews from Elath" as recorded in 2 Kings, Chapter 16, which states:

"In the seventeenth year of Pekah the son of Remaliah Ahaz the son of Jotham king of Judah began to reign. Then Rezin king of Syria and Pekah son of Remaliah king of Israel came up to Jerusalem to war; and they besieged Ahaz, but could over come him. At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath..." ^[36]

Keep in mind that the time frame is approximately 750 B.C., which is around 200 years after the split of Israel into the Houses of Judah and Israel in 975 B.C., and just before the beginning of the Assyrian captivity in 721-745 B.C. By this time Jotham was the king of Judah {the two southern tribes of Judah and Benjamin}, and Pekah was the king of Israel {the 10 northern tribes}.

It is the king of Syria, and Pekah, the king of Israel {not Judah}, who formed an alliance and went� to war against the House of Judah. During that war they were unable to take Jerusalem, but Rezin, king of Syria, was able to recover the city of Elath and "drave the Jews from Elath."

As previously stated, Elath was far south of the area inherited by Judah and was given to Shelah as an inheritance. Again this was probably done because as a bastard, he could not enter the congregation of Israel nor inherit with the children of Israel.

Remember, these people were part Canaanite, and in Strong's Concordance the word "Canaanite" means merchants and traders. Merchants cannot be merchants except in populated areas and therefore would have a propensity to migrate towards the cities, so it is logical to conclude that they were the ones who resided in Elath and were driven there-from.

It was from this area called Elath, and this area alone, that Rezin "drave the Jews." Ahaz, king of Judah {Southern Kingdom}, was still in Jerusalem and was never defeated nor was he driven anywhere. Pekah, king of Israel {Northern Kingdom}, apparently returned home.

Therefore, whatever "Jews" were driven from Elath were only a small portion of people located South of Judah - not all of the House of Judah, and none of the House of Israel. Therefore, the word "Jews," as used in this verse does not include any people from the House of Israel and probably none from the House of Judah. This limits the use of the word "Jew" in the Old Testament to a very small group of people who resided in the town of Elath, who were most likely descendants of Shelah.

Scripture does not tell us where these so-called "Jews from Elath" went after being driven from Elath, but being traders and merchants they would be city dwellers, and it is probably safe to assume that they moved north to the walled city of Jerusalem. After Rezin "drave the Jews" from Elath the area was again populated but this time by Edomites.

The word "Jews" is used for the first time in Scripture in the King James Authorized (KJA) version in this verse. If you own a 1592 copy of the Geneva Bible, or a 1611 King James version and will open it to this verse you will not find the word "Jew." According to the Jewish Encyclopedia:

"Up to the seventeenth century this word was spelled in the Middle English in various ways...Ieue, Ieu, Iwe, Iewe, Iue... corresponding to the Hebrew...a gentile adjective from the proper name 'Judah' seemingly never allied to member of the tribe {of Judah}, however, but to members of the nationality inhabiting the South of Palestine. It appears to have been afterward extended to apply to Israelites in the North..." ^[37]

If you will once again look at 2 Kings 16:6 in an original 1611 KJA version, you will find one of these words - You will not find the word "Jews."

And probably more interesting in this quote is the fact that the word "Ieue," etc., was never applied to the tribe of Judah but to a nationality "inhabiting the South of Palestine."

The encyclopedia fails to point out who these people were but it has previously been shown that the land South of Judah was occupied by the Shelah branch of Judah - a bastard son from his Canaanite wife.

According to Biblical scholar Alexander Schiffner:

"The first reference to any Jews in Scripture is found in 2 Kings 16:6. The name was applied TO A REMNANT OF JUDAH'S DESCENDANTS OF THE SHELAH BRANCH. Shelah-Judah was born in Chezib ^[38] and his descendants centuries later inherited his territory ^[39]. REMEMBER A STRICT GENEALOGY WAS KEPT OF EACH TRIBE AND BRANCH, ^[40]. Chezib ^[41], Achzib ^[42] and Chozeba ^[43] refer to one and the same place. It was a town in the lowlands of western Judah and was given to the Shelah branch of Judah for their inheritance ^[44]. 'This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah BY THEIR FAMILIES.' The word Chezib, Achzh or Chozeba means 'deceptive' or 'failing' and the place received its name from a winter spring or brook, which failed in the summer heat. {Symbolic of the failing of the Shela branch of Judah under trial}. It was the place where Judah was at the time of the birth of his half-breed son, Shelah ^[45]. In 1 Chronicles 4:21-22 it is called 'Chozeba.' it is in the valley of Elath and north of Addulum. Note 2 Kings 16:6 - the first reference to this branch of Judah; 'the Jews of Elath.' The Jews are the remnant' of 'Yehudim' of Judah. This branch of Judah rejected Christ. They are the open witness, 'The shew of their countenance doth witness against them - their tongue and their doings are against the Lord - they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not.' ^[46]." ^[47]

James Fox, the author of several books, wrote of Shelah:

"The reason for the divergence of facial appearance between the true Hebrew or Abrahamic White-Race Men, and the Jews, is that the patriarch Judah disobeyed God's will at the outset by marrying a Canaanitish woman called 'Shua' ^[48], producing descendants all half-castes, later known as 'Jews.'" ^[49]

According to these authors, the "Jews of Elath" were the "remnant" of "Yehudim" of Judah, and verses 5 and 6 of 2 Kings, chapter 16, are the first reference to the mongrel Canaanite branch of Judah where they are referred to as "Jews" {actually "Ieue," etc., in the 1611 KJA Version}.

The use of the word "Jews" in 2 Kings 16:6 rather than "Ieues" has added to the misconception that the Jews are all of Israel, when it is obvious that in this verse only a small group of people were implied - those living in Elath - which omits the entire northern ten tribes and the majority of the House of Judah.

The major problem with the Jew in Anytown USA's conversa-tions is that the word carries so many definitions and so few seem very want to know fully what he is really talking about or referring to when he uses the term "Jew."

Most so-called (c)hristians of today, even those who are of Israelite stock, and are not aware of it, don't want to hear the words, concepts and truth contained in this study.

Those of Israelite heritage may find some fulfillment in Jeremiah's words, found in Chapter 5:30-31 which sound all too familiar:

"A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land; The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so; and what will ye do in the end thereof?"

Some think that the King James Version is the only correct version. This version was written in 1611, but it for sure contains some errors. Look at John 4:22, where Christ tells the woman of Samari:

"Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship; for salvation is of the Jews."

This is a primary script for the problem we face today, for any discerning true Christian Israelite should see this is not a true statement, but rather a false one based on its own merits. Any Christian should realize the truth that SALVATION DOES NOT COME THROUGH ANY RELIGION OR ANY RACE OF PEOPLE, BUT THROUGH JESUS THE CHRIST.

The Ferrar Fenton version, which comes from the original Greek text, says: "salvation comes from among the Judeans." Now which way should we Israelites come to know fully the truth of this verse? If Christ came out of the region of Judea and the Hebrew tribe of Judah, then HE is the way, the truth and the life ^[50]. Paul planted the first Christian Church in Corinth, teaching that Christ is the Salvation for HIS people. But we hear the resounding common statement, but Pontius Pilate said that He was "King of the Jews."

But did he really say that as most, deceived, Judeo-Christians believe? There are some who say, "Thank God! My Savior Was Not A Jew!," that there is a historical record found in the Achoko Volume in the Congressional Library in Washington, D.C., containing an official record of one of Pilate's correspondences. He states on pages 137-139:

���� "The Archoko record gives an eye-witness account from Pontius Pilate, who testified that Jesus did not look like, or act like a Jew. Here is the account as it appears in this official record: To Tiberius Caesar, Emperor of Rome Noble Sovereign, Greetings: '...Among various rumors that came to my ears there was one in particular that came to my attention. A young man it was said, had appeared in Galilee, preaching with noble unction a new law in the name of the God who sent him. At first I was apprehensive that his design was to stir up the people against the Romans, but my fears were soon dispelled.

���� Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day in passing by the place of Siloe, where there was a great concourse of people, I observed in the midst of the group a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected, so great was the difference between him and those who listened to him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance an almost celestial aspect. He appeared to be about thirty years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between he and his hearers with their black beards and tawny complexions!...

��� ��Never have I heard in the words of the philosopher, anything that can compare with the maxims of Jesus. One of the rebellious Jews, so numerous in Jerusalem, asked Jesus if it was lawful to give tribute to Caesar, he replied: 'Render unto Caesar the things which belong to Caesar, and unto God the things which are God's...wrote to Jesus requesting an interview with him at the praetorium and he came.' ^[51]. ^[52]

���� Pilate's report to Caesar continues: 'You know that in my veins flows the Spanish mixed with Roman blood...When the Nazarene made his appearance, I was walking in my basilic, and my feet seemed fastened with an iron hand to the marble pavement, and I trembled in every limb as does a guilty culprit, though the Nazarene was as calm as innocence itself. When he came up to me and stopped, and by a signal sign seemed to say to me, 'I am here!' though he spoke not a word. For some time I contemplated with admiration and awe, this extraordinary type of man, a type unknown to our numerous painter...There was nothing about him that was repelling in its character and I felt awed and tremulous to approach him.

���� Jesus, I said to him at last, 'Jesus of Nazareth, for the last three years I have granted you ample freedom of speech ^[53] nor do I regret it. Your words are those of a sage. I know not whether you have read Socrates or Plato, but this I know, there is in your discourse a majestic simplicity that elevates you above those philosophers...'your blood shall not be spilled,' I said, with deep emotion, 'you are more precious in my estimation on account of your wisdom than all the turbulent and proud Pharisees who abuse the freedoms granted them by Rome. They conspire against Caesar, and convert his bounty into fear, impressing on the unlearned, that Caesar is a tyrant who seeks their ruin...I will protect you against them. My praetorium shall be an asylum both day and night.' I am our obedient servant, Pontius Pilate."

But, think for yourself! Doesn't it make sense to you that the Jews would try and suppress this truth?

The insidious forces of the Jews working from within and opposed to all our great traditions are the first and most serious challenge that faces America. There are those who seek to corrupt our youth that they may rule over them, as witnessed by their actions for the past several decades. They are seeking to destroy our unity by stirring up antagonism among the various Christian denominations.

They in one way or another, intrude their stooges into many of our highest military and executive offices, the present William Clinton is a perfect example - he has appointed more Jews to office than all of his predecessors combined.

Effective in any evil purposes is the current menace of censorship, unnoticed by the general public, and the greater threatened menace of a far more drastic censorship imposed under the name of "Hate Laws."

Throughout history members of an unassimilated minority have repeatedly been used as individual spies, as when the Parthians used Jews in Rome as spies while the Romans used Jews in Parthia for the same purpose. In stances of espionage, involving the theft of atomic secrets from both Canada and the United States, but those pail in comparison to the espionage which has occurred since that time.

According to "A History of Palestine from 135 A.D. to Modern Times," by James Parkes, Oxford University Press, New York, 1909, Persians in 614 A.D. invaded Palestine, a part of the Christian Roman Empire of the East, and took Jerusalem. Mr. Parkes relates:

"There is no doubt that the...Jews aided the Persians with all the men they could muster, and that the help they gave was considerable. Once Jerusalem was in Persian hands a terrible massacre of Christians took place, and the Jews are accused of having taken the lead in this massacre." ^[54]

Another famous betrayal of a country by its Jewish minority took place in Spain. In his "History of the Jews," Vol. III, p. 109, Professor Graetz gives an account of the coming of alien conquerors into Spain, a country which had been organized by the Visigoths, a race closely akin in blood to the English, Swedes, Germans and other peoples of the North Sea area, and well they might because they were part of the True Tribes of Israel.

���� "The Jews of Africa, who at various times had emigrated thither from Spain, and their unlucky co-religionists of the Peninsula, made common cause with the Mohametan conqueror, Tarik, who brought over from Africa into Andalusia an army eager for the fray. After the Battle of Xeres (July, 711 A.D.), and the death of Frederic, the last of the Visigothic kings, the victorious Arabs pushed onward, and were everywhere supported by the Jews. In every city that they conquered, the Moslem generals were able to leave but a small garrison of their own troops, as they had need of every man for the subjection of the country; they therefore confided them to the safekeeping of the Jews.

���� In this manner the Jews, who but lately had been serfs, now became the masters of the towns of Cordova, Grenada, Malaga, and many others. When Tarik appeared before the capital, Toledo, he found it occupied by a small garrison only, the nobles and clergy having found safety in flight. WHILE THE CHRISTIANS WERE IN CHURCH, PRAYING FOR THE SAFETY OF THEIR COUNTRY AND RELIGION THE JEWS FLUNG OPEN THE GATES TO THE VICTORIOUS ARABS (Palm Sunday, 712), receiving them with acclamations, and thus avenged themselves for the many miseries which had befallen them in the course of a century since the time of Reccared and Sisebut. The capital also was entrusted by Tarik to the custody of the Jews, while he pushed on in pursuit of the cowardly Visigoths, who had sought safety in flight, for the purpose of recovering from them the treasure which they had carried off.

���� Finally, when Musa Ibn-Nosair, the Governor of Africa, brought a second army into Spain and conquered other cities he also delivered them into the custody of the Jews."

The "miseries" which the Jews of Spain used as a reason to commit treason are explained by Professor Graetz. King Sisebut was annoyingly determined to convert them to Christianity, and among the "miseries" inflicted by King Reccared;

"the most oppressive of all WAS THE RESTRAINT TO THE POSSESSION OF SLAVES. HENCEFORWARD THE JEWS WERE NEITHER TO PURCHASE CHRISTIAN SLAVES NOR TO ACCEPT THEM AS PRESENTS." ^[55]

The newly Christianized East German Goths of Spain were noted for their chastity, piety, and tolerance ^[56], but the later quality apparently was not inclusive enough to allow the wealthy alien minority to own the coveted bodies of fair-haired girls and young men.

There is a lesson for America in the solicitude of the Visigoths for their young people. Americans of native stock should rouse themselves from their lethargic indifference and should study the set-up which permits the enslavement of young people's minds by forces hostile to Western Christian civilization.

Our boys and girls are propagandized constantly by books, periodicals, magazines, movies, television, radio and advertisements; and from some of the things that they read and see and hear they are influenced toward a degraded standard of personal conduct, an indifference to the traditional doctrines of Christianity, and a sympathy for Marxism or Communism.

Which is witnessed by the glee the Jews regard this "revolution" of morals:

"The Jews welcome this revolution in the Christian world...It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism: all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews." ^[57]

American parents must evolve and make successful a positive, not a negative, counter-movement in favor of the mores of Western civilization, or that civilization will fall. It is well known that the Communists expend their greatest effort at capturing the young; but in this most vital of all fields those Americans who are presumably anti-Communist have, made so little effort that it may well be described as none at all.

Since President Franklin Roosevelt's recognition of the Soviet masters of Russia (November 16, 1933), the United States has consistently helped to "wound itself" by catering to the "insidious forces working from within," who are "opposed to all our great traditions" of Christian civilization. These powerful "forces" have been welcomed to our shores, they have become rich and influential, and nothing has been expected of them beyond a pro-American patriotism, which they have never given, rather than a hostile nationalist separatism. In spite of all the kindnesses, the Jews have received, they have, however, stubbornly adhered to their purposes and have indeed "gravely weakened the structure and tone of our American way of life." But the wealth of our land and the vitality of our people have been so great that the trap has not yet been finally sprung; the noose has not yet been fatally drawn.

Despite the hostile aliens who exert such tremendous power in Washington; despite the aid and succor given them by uninformed, hired, or subverted persons of native stock, and the so-called Judeo-Christian traitors who fill America's pulpits; despite the work of the "romantics, bums, and enemy agents" who have directed our foreign policy in recent years, there is a chance for the survival of America. A great country can be conquered only if it is inwardly rotten. We can still be free, IF WE WISH.

�� 1). We must lift the curtain of censorship and not allow the Jews to enhance and strengthen it who, not satisfied with falsifying the news of the hour, has gone back into past centuries to mutilate the classics of our literature and to exclude from our school histories such vital and significant facts.

A start toward this goal can be made by exercising some of the Constitution-guaranteed rights, and by subscribing to periodicals with a firm record of opposing Communism. The reading of newsletters and books friendly to the American traditions not only encourages and strengthens the publishers of such works but makes the reader of them a better informed and therefore a more effective instrument in the great cause of saving Western Christian civilization.

�� 2). We must begin in the spirit of humane Christian civilization to evolve some method of preventing our unassimilable mass of aliens and alien-minded people from exercising in this country a power over our culture and our lives out of all proportion to the number of the minority, and to prevent this minority from shaping, against the general national interest, our policies on such vital matters as war and immigration. Our danger from internal sources hostile to our civilization was the subject of a warning by General MacArthur in his speech before the Massachusetts Legislature on July 25, 1951:

���� "This evil force, with neither spiritual base nor moral standard, rallies the abnormal and sub-normal elements among our citizenry and applies internal pressure against all things we hold decent and all things that we hold right, the type of pressure which has caused many Christian nations abroad to fall and their own cherished freedoms to languish in the shackles of complete suppression.

���� As it has happened there it can happen here. Our need for patriotic fervor and religious devotion was never more impelling. There can be no compromise with atheistic communism, no half way in the preservation of freedom and religion. It must be all or nothing.

���� We must unite in the high purpose that the liberties etched upon the design of our life by our forefathers be unimpaired and that we maintain the moral courage and spiritual leadership to preserve inviolate that bulwark of all freedom, our Christian faith."

�� 3). We must effect a genuine clean-up of our government removing not only all those who can be proven to be traitors, but also all those whose policies have for stupidity or bad judgment been inimical to the interests of our country.

There is one point in the fore-mentioned passage of Acts 18 that most folks seem to over look. Paul came to Corinth and planted the first Christian Church with the True Israelite inhabitants who apparently were worshipping Judaism out of ignorance.

With little success at first, but a s a rational, as well as spiritual preacher, Paul reasoned with all Jews (Both non-Israel and True Israel) not with force or violence but by fair arguing he won some over to his own opinion.

In verses 9 and 10, Paul had a vision. Each of us ought to know fully this vision and effectively grasp its meaning in our lives, today, as White Israelites. We read in the King James Version:

"Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace: For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city."

We should renew our own commission "be not afraid of the Jews." That means be not afraid of the magistrates of the city, county, state or federal for they have no power against you but what is given them from above. We are pleading, like Paul, the cause of heaven and we need to do it boldly. We should not be afraid of their words, nor dismayed at their quirky looks and fraudulent judgments. At the right times we should speak, and not hold back.

We should let no opportunity slip by without speaking in defense of Christianity and in opposition to the Jews and their hideous Judaism. We should not speak shyly or with caution, but up front, plainly and fully and with courage. We need to speak out in the liberty of the Spirit that becomes an ambassador for Christ.

Paul did speak up and the "Jews" rose up against him, but the Lord went to court with him and threw out his accusers by the hand of a person in high position.

In this city that "Jews flocked to" you must remember that Corinth was a very profane and wicked city, full of impurity of all kinds and idols of all kinds. Yet in this great evil heap, with all its contempt for White Christian Israelites, i.e., the wheat, it sure seemed to human knowledge that the chaff would over come, but in this ore that seems to be all dross, there is gold.

Even in Corinth, Christ had much people. So we need to unseat this "fear of the Jews syndrome" and expose their evil, wicked plot to destroy all Christianity. This needs to be done today, before time runs out. Have you come "to know fully" the truth about Judaism and Christianity?

In verses 12-17 of Acts, Chapter 18, we find another of Paul's many trying times with the Jews {worshippers of Judaism - Traditions of the Elders}. Paul is accused by member of this Jewish sect before the Roman Governor, Gallio. Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, that is he was the proconsul for this province of the Roman Empire. In modern words this Jewish sect filed a frivolous complaint in a Roman court against Paul and Gallio was to be the presiding judge.

Paul was rudely apprehended with violence and fury in broad day light. These Jews cared little for public peace and justice, so they made insurrection. To me this means that they used disturbance of the public peace and force, i.e., vi et Armis, to apprehend Paul.

They had little concern for his welfare or the safety of others. They, as they do today, already had pronounced Paul guilty in the media of their day. Just as they had at the trials of Christ.

These enforcers hurried Paul off, probably in chains, to the judgment seat before Gallio. Paul was allowed no time, whatsoever, to prepare for his trial. Sounds like a familiar patriot scenario of arrest today, does it not?

Paul, much like Christ, is falsely accused before Gallio (v. 13). What was the formal charge?

"This fellow persuades men to worship God contrary to the law."

My what a crime! Paul must have been "anti-semitic." These Jews could not charge him with persuading men NOT to worship God at all or to worship other Gods ^[58]. So the only trumped up charge they could accuse him of breaking was,

"that he was attempting to persuade men to worship God in a way contrary to the law (of the Jews)."

Now what in the world would you consider as being "contrary to the law." Does this sound a familiar alarm today? Sure it does! If you act "contrary" to the "law" of Title 26, your state motor vehicle "laws," or your property appraisal and collection "laws," see how fast you will be jerked up before some judgment seat and be made to pay for your "crimes."

The Romans allowed the Jews in all their provinces the observation of their own law. But, remember in verse 2, it is recorded, that Jews had been commanded to leave Rome. I wonder why? Did they have a Jewish problem in the society of that day? But who would enforce Jewish law in such a city of idols and corruption?

Should all people therefore be prosecuted as criminals, who worship God in any other way than that prescribed by the tenets of Judaism? The big question before Gallio is, "Does Roman toleration include a power of imposition?" Could Roman law force Paul or anyone to stop practicing any activity contrary to what the "Jews" call their law?

You must remember that the Jewish religion hates Christ and all goyium, i.e., White People. This is why the Jews of Corinth were so uptight against Paul for he was preaching Salvation through the Blood of Christ.

This tenet of Israelite Christianity is unacceptable then and today for the Jews of this Pharisaism, i.e., Judaism. How the so-called (c)hristian of today can use the term Judeo-Christian is a gigantic mystery to many. When will the little "c" Christians come "to know fully" that these are two diametrically opposites. Just like black against white, not verses cold and light verses dark?

Paul was charged unjustly. Are White Israelite patriots ever charged unjustly, for violating some phantom law? Do they have ample opportunity to be tried in courts of certified common law venue where justice, fairness and real law prevails?

Rarely, if ever, not since about 1861 have justice been had in such courts. Paul had a different circumstance at this hearing than most patriots are usually afforded today. Gallio had a sweet nature and was sympathetic and apparently a stickler for the letter of the law.

For Gallio reasoned that the Jews in their own law, had in it a promise of a Prophet whom God would raise up to them, and they should listen to him and/or hear him. And Paul only persuaded people to believe in this Prophet, who was to come and to hear Him, which was all according "to the law." For this Prophet came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it. Paul's teaching contradicted Judaism, partially the idea of Christ being the Messiah.

At the first hearing or, perhaps, a better way to put it, is no hearing at all, for Gallio dismisses the cause and states that he will not take any cognizance of the issue, at all. Paul was just about to make his defense which he apparently became so eloquently accustomed to doing ^[59].

Paul was about to present evidence that would prove that he did not teach men to worship contrary to the law, when Gallio rules that he will not be troubled with this case and will not pass sentence upon it nor even allow himself the trouble of examining it.

He, Gallio, was very capable of doing the part of a judge in any matter properly placed before him to take cognizance of. He said to the Jews, that were the prosecutors, "If it were a matter of wrong, or wicked lewdness," if you could charge the prisoner with theft or fraud, with murder or plunder or any act of immorality.

I would be bound to hear you with your complaint or accusations. Just because these Jews were loud and noisy and rude petitioners of this court, there was no valid reason to give them a hearing in any obvious unjust case. If the petitioner's cause had been just then it would have been the duty of Gallio or any magistrate to cause justice to be done. That means redress the injured party to be afforded his right(s). Then Gallio would pass comment and give the court's sentence upon the party causing the injury. If the complaint had merits even though not made with all the decorum of a judicial case, Gallio would have felt bound to hear the petitioner, no matter how rude and noisy they were in presenting it.

But Gallio will not and did not allow these Jews a chance to make a complaint to him for something not within his jurisdiction. Oh, if we had a few judges and magistrates today of the caliber to determine rightful venue and jurisdiction.

This Jude would not allow the Jews to burden his patience by hearing it nor would he burden his conscience with passing judgment upon this matter. And when the Jews hollered and screamed more and more, he found them in contempt of "his" court and drove them from the seat of judgment. Then he called the next cause. Bravo, Bravo!!!

This passage makes one think that Gallio conducted himself in a dignified and honorable mode. If only we had judges today who possessed this character. He did not want to, nor even pretend to judge spiritual things that he did not really understand.

This judgment would be left to the Jews in matters regarding their religion of Judaism. Yet he would not allow, the Jews to make him {Gallio} their instrument or tool of malice and pretend to pass judgment against Paul {he was following the example Pilate showed when he washed his hands of the matter concerning Christ, and told the Jews to do what they would, but he would have nothing to do with killing Christ}.

Gallio looked upon this matter as not within his venue and jurisdiction and he did not intend to meddle in this affair anymore than a dismissal.

Gallio seems to have understood the law better than he did religious and/or worship. Whether Christ was the Messiah and of God, was not the issue before his court and he felt no need to take "judicial notice" of the law of any God. Whether the Gospel teachings of Christ the Messiah was of divine origin or not as these were not questions of words and names as Gallio scornfully and profanely called them.

These are valid concerns for Christianity and Judaism but not for a Roman Court, and he felt because of his ignorance of Judaism and Christianity, he did not want to inquire very far into them.

"In 1923, Trotsky [a Jew], and Lunatcharsky PRESIDED OVER A MEETING IN MOSCOW ORGANIZED by the propaganda section of the Communist party TO JUDGE GOD. Five thousand men of the Red Army were present. THE ACCUSED [Almighty God] WAS FOUND GUILTY OF VARIOUS IGNOMINIOUS ACTS AND HAVING HAD THE AUDACITY TO FAIL TO APPEAR, HE [God] WAS CONDEMNED IN DEFAULT." ^[60]

Then like today, a great contempt was placed upon the court by the Jews and/or Greeks. For they took Sosthenes and beat him in open contempt of Gallio's dismissal of the case against Paul. Look what happened, recently, in California and other places.

If the Jews of Judaism can't have it their way against Christians, they will take it out in some other manner. They were enraged against not only Paul, but also against Gallio and his court of justice. They wanted to be their own prosecutors and if Gallio would not rule in their favor, they would become their own judges and executioners. Apparently the contempt showed what the Jews did, and it did not come before Gallio's court.

Gallio cared for none of those things is a puzzling concept of a man who somehow tried to help Paul for whatever reason. If we can presume that this means that this judge is calloused against the things that bad men do to good men, except when brought into his jurisdiction, we find a flaw in the character of this Roman judge.

As a judge he should have protected Sosthenes as much as he did Paul. But the facts point out that he did not. This kind of indifference carries just-us attitudes that compliments tyranny. His do-nothing attitude is evidence of one of Isaiah's writings:

"that truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter, and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey." ^[61]

Sounds like modern day news reporting, doesn't it?

Our courts today appear to adhere to the concept that justice somehow means just-us and all outsiders (non-Jews) will fall in line under its power to be administered by our controlled and/or deceived judges. So ask yourself, is there a "Jew" word problem; or a society "Jew" problem? Can one come "to know fully" the difference between Jewish Judaism and real true Israelite Christianity: The mixing of the two religions don't mix anymore than trying to mix oil and water.

Those who are truly seeking truth have at one time or another had a man/woman sent from God to witness of the Identity Movement and usually they simply ignored it the first time.

Then God in His wisdom would send another. This time the messenger would be so convincing that the Truth Seeker would set out to prove him {or the material if it were a book or some other written information} wrong. To prove it a false concept. Then they found that the more they studied and learned they found that they have been lied to and deceived by a lot of so-called Christian folks.

They came to believe that this was more out of ignorance on their part than deliberate, for they are deceived and content, most of them, to live therein.

But when the Lord reveals much more of His Word to them, they decide to re-educate themselves and find that the process is a never ending one. Because as they learn more, God will reveal more - making the Scriptures "seek and ye shall find" ever more true. They soon found that the Identity teachings were more on line than fundamental Christianity as taught in the churches, on TV and radio today.

It appears to them that the more they study, research and meditate, the more the world pulls at their time just to make ends meet. So they know how the world will pull at you as you attempt to learn the truth.

The Jew today still works as they did in the hay-day of Corinth to keep True Israelite Christians so busy that they don't have time to stop and smell the roses and find real truth.

It will only be with the help of YHWH {Almighty God} that the financial prison most of us fined ourselves caged in, will open and free us, swinging open the doors of liberty. Such liberty produces the time and resources needed to wage successful campaigns against the onslaught of deceit, lies and deception in todays (c)hristian parishes or folds.

Corinthians were famous for their cleverness, inventiveness and artistic sense. They prided themselves in the embellishment of their city and in the adornment of their heathen temples. But, not a single Corinthian ever distinguished himself in literature. Sound Jewish?

The Adamic Man, White People of Israelites i.e., Hebrew stock, are the chosen seed of Israel's race. They need to come to know fully who they are, and what they are.

Their heritage demands fulfillment here in this American land, the New Jerusalem as spoken of in the Scriptures. Jesus the Christ, the Salvation of Israel, did not come to the Jewish people. in fact He came against almost everything they stand for. He came to the White Israelites, Matthew 15:24 states:

"I AM not SENT, but TO THE LOST SHEEP of the House of Israel." ^[62]

Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following:

"STRICTLY SPEAKING IT IS INCORRECT TO CALL AN ANCIENT ISRAELITE A 'JEW' OR TO CALL A CONTEMPORARY JEW AN ISRAELITE OR A HEBREW." ^[63]

The World Book omits any reference to the Jews, but under the word Semite it states:

"Semite...Semites are those who speak Semitic languages. In this sense the ancient Hebrews, Assyrians, Phoenicians, and Cartaginians were Semites. The Arabs and some Ethiopians are modern Semitic‑speaking people. Modern Jews are often called Semites, but this name properly applies ONLY TO THOSE WHO USE THE HEBREW LANGUAGE. The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, BUT THEY HAVE MIXED WITH OTHER PEOPLES UNTIL THE NAME 'JEW' HAS LOST ALL RACIAL MEANING."

Who are the Jews and where is the proof of their existence today? The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41, says:

"EDOM IS IN MODERN JEWRY."

There is only one nation in the world that can prove ancestral ties with Edom, and the Jews themselves claim that dubious distinction.

To help answer this question further, we refer you to the excellent book (which should be required reading) entitled "Who is Esau-Edom?" by Charles A. Weisman, copyright 1991, 2nd Edition: May 1992, paperback 128 pages, approx. $8.00. Order from Weisman Publications, %11751 W. Riverhills Dr. #107D, Burnsville, MN 55337.

This little book covers the life, history, genealogy, prophecy, predestination and modern identity of Biblical Esau.

Another excellent booklet by Pastor Bob Hallstrom is entitled "Who Are the Pharisees, and the 'Jew' Are they Israel?" Order from: The Gospel of the Kingdom, % P.O. Box 9411, Boise, Idaho 83707, Phone (208) 375-3425.

If you don't understand the information in these two books, you will be unable to properly understand the central focus of the Scripture. The Dake Annotated Reference Bible, while being a scholarly effort, it provides annotations and perspectives which suffer from the authors lack of an informed basis regarding the true identity of the "Jews," Pharisees, Hebrews, and Israel.

In the last century Bram Stocker wrote the book Dracula and in his book he was describing the Jews from the very beginning of their drive to "occupy" our bodies and souls from the very beginning of the Luciferian infiltration of our society.

There are hundreds of books {most of which are Jewish Encyclopedias and history books} available for study, which prove that over 90% of the JEWS OF THE WORLD ARE NOT A SEMITIC PEOPLE, but few people other than historians ever bother to read them.

The religion practiced by the Pharisees in Jesus' time was based exclusively on the Babylonian Talmud. This, according to Rabbi Morris Kertzer,

"The Talmud consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and historical writings of the ancient rabbis. It was edited five centuries after the birth of Jesus. It is a compendium of law and lore. IT IS THE LEGAL CODE WHICH FORMS THE BASIS OF JEWISH RELIGIOUS LAW AND IT IS THE TEXTBOOK USED IN THE TRAINING OF RABBIS."

In his lifetime Michael Rodkinson, the assumed name of a "Jew" who was one of the world's great authorities on the Talmud, wrote "History of the Talmud." This classic on the subject was written by Michael Rodkinson in collaboration with the celebrated Rabbi Isaac M. Wise.

In his "History of the Talmud" Michael Rodkinson, on page 70, states:

"Is the literature that Jesus was familiar with in his early years yet in existence in the world? Is it possible for us to get at it? Can we ourselves review the ideas, the statements, the modes of reasoning and thinking, ON MORAL AND RELIGIOUS SUBJECTS, which were current in his time, and MUST HAVE BEEN EVALUATED BY HIM DURING THOSE THIRTY SILENT YEARS WHEN HE WAS PONDERING HIS FUTURE MISSION? To such inquiries the learned class of Jewish rabbis ANSWER BY HOLDING UP THE TALMUD ...and the question becomes, therefore, an interesting one TO EVERY CHRISTIAN. What is the Talmud? THE TALMUD, THEN, IS THE WRITTEN FORM OF THAT WHICH, IN THE TIME OF JESUS WAS CALLED THE TRADITIONS OF THE ELDERS AND TO WHICH HE MAKES FREQUENT ALLUSIONS."

Arsene Darmester in the book "The Talmud" states:

���� "Judaism finds its expression in the Talmud, it is not a remote suggestion and a faint echo thereof, but it...has become incarnate, in which it has taken form, passing from a state of abstraction into the domain of real things. The study of Judaism is that of the Talmud, as the study of the Talmud is that of Judaism...they are two inseparable things...they are one and the same...the Talmud, is a complete expression of religious movement, and this code of endless presumptions and minute ceremonials represents in its perfection the total work of the religious idea...The miracle was accomplished by a book, The Talmud...The Talmud is composed of two distinct parts the Mishna and the Gemara; the former the text, the latter a commentary upon the text... term Mishna we designate a collection of decisions and traditional laws embracing all departments of legislation, civil and religious... This code, the work of several generations of rabbis...nothing can equal the importance of the Talmud unless it be the ignorance that prevails concerning it...This explains how it happens that a single page of the Talmud contains three or four different languages, or rather specimens of one language at three or four stages of degeneracy...many a Mishna of five or six lines is accompanied by fifty or sixty pages of explanation...is law in all its authority; it constitutes dogma and cult; it is the fundamental element of the Talmud...The daily study of the Talmud which among Jews begins with the age of ten to end with life itself necessarily was a severe gymnastic for the mind, thinks to which it acquired incomparable subtlety and acumen...since it aspires to one thing: To establish for Judaism a 'Corpus Juris Eccleiastict!'"�

Now, for a summary of references to Jesus in the Talmud:

�� Sanhedrin 67a: Jesus referred to as the son of Pandira, a soldier. Mother a prostitute.

�� Kallah 1b. (18b): Illegitimate and conceived during menstruation. Mother a Prostitute.

�� Sanhedrin 67a: Jesus was hanged on the eve of Passover.

�� Toldath Jeschu: The Birth of Christ related in most shameful expressions.

�� Abhodah Zarah II: Christ referred to as the son of Pandira, a Roman soldier, a Prostitute Mother.

�� Schabbath XIV: Christ again referred to as the son of Padira the Roman soldier.

�� Sanhedrin 43a: On the eve of Passover they hanged Jesus.

�� Schabbath 104b: Called a fool and no one pays attention to fools.

�� Toldoth Jeschu: Says Judas and Jesus engaged in a quarrel with human excrement.

�� Sanhedrin 103a: Suggested corrupts his morals and dishonors self.

�� Sanhedrin 107b: Seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel.

�� Zohar III (282): Died like a beast and buried in animal's dung heap.

�� Hilkoth Melakhim: Attempt to prove Christians err in worship of Jesus.

�� Abhodah Zarah 21a: Reference to worship of Jesus in homes unwanted.

�� Orach Chaiim 113: Avoid appearance of paying respect to Jesus.

�� Iore Dea 150, 2: Do not appear to pay respect to Jesus by accident.

�� Abhodah Zarah (6a): False teaching to worship on the first day of Sabbath.

�� Kerithuth (6b p. 78): Jews called men, Christians are not called men.

�� Makkoth (7b): Innocent of murder if intent was to kill Christian.

�� Sohar (II 64b): Christian birth rate must be diminished materially.

�� Schabbath (116a) Tos: Gospels called volummes of iniquity, heretical books.

�� Schabbath (116a): Talmudists agree that the books of Christians are to be burned.

�� Chullin (91b): Jews possess dignity even an angel cannot share.

�� Hilkoth Akum (V. 12): Quote Scriptures FORBID MENTIONING THE CHRISTIAN GOD.

�� Choschen Ham (226 1): Jew may keep lost property of Christian found by Jew.

�� Babha Kama (113b): It is permitted to deceive Christians; Jew may lie and perjure to condemn a Christian; Name of God not profaned when lying to Christians.

�� Kallah (1b p. 18): Jew may perjure himself with a clear conscience.

�� Schabbouth Hag. (d): Jews may swear falsely with subterfuge wording.

�� Zohar (1 160a): Jews must always try to deceive Christians.

�� Choschen Ham (425 5): Jews are not to prevent the death of a Christian.

�� Hilkkoth Akum (x,1): Do not save Christians in danger of death, instructed to let die.

�� Abhodah Zarah (25b)T: Even the best of the Goim [Christians] should be killed.

�� Sepher Or Israel 177b: If Jew kills a Christian he commits� no sin.

�� Zohar (11 43a): EXTERMINATION OF CHRISTIANS NECESSARY.

�� Hilkhoth Akum (x,1): Make no agreements and show no mercy to Christians.

�� Hilkhoth Maakhaloth: Christians are idolaters.

�� Abhodah Zarah (22a): Do not associate with gentiles, they shed blood.

�� Abhodah Zarah (22a): Christians have intercourse with animals.

�� Iore Dea (198, 48): Female Jews contaminated when meeting Christians.

�� Makkoth (7b): Innocent of murder if intent was to kill a Christian.

�� Zohar II (64b): Christian likened to cows and asses.

�� Kethuboth (110b): Psalmist compares Christians to beasts.

�� Sanhedrin (74b) Tos: Sexual intercourse with Christian same as intercourse with beast.

�� Kethuboth (3b): The seed [children] of Christians valued same as the seed of a beast.

�� Iore Dea (337, 1): Replace dead Christians like you would a lost cow or ass.

�� Schabbath (116a) Tos: Gospels called the volummes of iniquity, and heretical books.

�� Schabbath (116a): Talmudists agree the books of Christians� are to be burned.

�� Chullin (91b): Jews possess dignity even an angel cannot share.

�� Sanhedrin (58b): To strike a Jew is the same as slapping the face of God.

�� Zohar (1, 25b): Those Jews who do good to Christians never� rise when dead.

�� Iore Dea (148, 12H): Jews are to hide their hatred for Christians.

�� Babha Bathra (54b): Christian property belongs to the first� Jew claiming it.

�� Babha Kama (113b): It is permitted for a Jew to deceive Christians.

�� Babha Kama (113a): Jew may lie and perjure himself to condemn a Christian.

�� Babha Kama (113b): The name of God is not profaned when a Jew lies to Christians.

�� Kallah (1b, p. 18): Jew may perjure himself when lying about Christians.

�� Schabbouth Hag (6d): Jews may swear falsely by the use of� subterfuge wording.

�� Zohar (1, 160a): Jews MUST ALWAYS try to deceive Christians.

�� Choschen Ham (425, 5): Do not prevent a Christians death.

�� Iore Dea (158, 1): Christians who are NOT Jews' enemies MUST ALSO DIE.

�� Hilkkoth Akum (X,1): Jews are not to save Christians in danger of death.

�� Sanhedrin (59a): Christians who study the Jews' "Laws" {Talmud} to be put to death.

�� Zohar (1, 25a): CHRISTIANS ARE TO BE DESTROYED WHEN NO DANGER OF DISCOVERY.

�� Abhodah Zarah (26b)T: Even the best of the Goim [non‑Jews] should be killed.

�� Iore Dea (157, 2) H: Jew may deceive Christians.

�� Sepher Or Israel (177b): IF A JEW KILLS A CHRISTIAN HE COMMITS NO SIN. HE HAS DONE GOD A SERVICE.

�� Alkut Simoni (245c): A JEW SHEDDING THE BLOOD OF A CHRISTIAN IS OFFERING A SACRIFICE TO GOD.

�� Zohar (II, 43a): EXTERMINATION OF CHRISTIANS IS A NECESSARY SACRIFICE TO GOD.

�� Zohar (L, 38b, 39a): A JEW TO RECEIVE A HIGH PLACE� IN HEAVEN IF HE KILLS A CHRISTIAN.

�� Hilkhoth Akum (X,1): JEWS ARE TO SHOW NO MERCY TO A CHRISTIAN.

These are JUST A FEW selected from a very complicated arrangement in which MANY references are obscured by intricate reasonings. Speaking of the "Tradition of the Elders," Jesus said:

"Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders?... But he [Jesus] answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?...ye have made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition." ^[64]

Jesus said a second time:

"Then the Pharisees and scribes [The Jews] asked him [Jesus], Why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders...He [Jesus] answered and said unto them...Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition." ^[65]

Paul said of the "Tradition of the Elders."

"Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and NOT AFTER CHRIST." ^[66]

Peter also spoke of them.

"Forasmuch as ye know that ye [Jews] were not redeemed... from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers." ^[67]

So Jesus' teaching could not have possibly come from this blasphemous book. The Babylonian Talmud is the Jewish holy book, used in the training of rabbis, taught in the synagogues by the rabbis and studied by the Jews from an early age until death.

Without any question, THE TALMUD (Known to Jesus in His time on earth in a flesh body as "The Tradition of The Elders") STANDS AS THE SUPREME AUTHORITY OF JEWISH LAW [Their lies to the contrary notwithstanding], philosophy and ethics; it contains the unchanging moral code by which the religious and social life of the Jews has been regulated to this day.

The Jews believe in the teachings of the Talmud and act in accordance with its commands. Whereas the teachings of the Christian Bible are available to all, for it is to be found everywhere.

On the other hand, only a very few non‑Jews have even so much as heard of the Talmud, and still fewer know of its teachings, for it is scores of volummes in length and shrouded in secrecy by the Jews.

Are you naive enough to believe that a religious book which encourages incest, such as the Sanhedrin volume of the Talmud does, or unnatural intercourse, or rape of non‑Jews; or bestiality, as found in this filthy book; do you believe this could be the basis of Jesus' teaching? If you do, then you are guilty of the vilest form of blasphemy.

Are you willing to believe that statements found in the Talmud, such as those which follow, are those of Christianity? Listen closely, while we give you a few more by chapter and verse:

�� KALLAH, 1b, (18b): "Jesus was illegitimate and conceived during menstruation."

�� SCABBATH XIV: "Jesus is referred to as the son of a Roman soldier and a Jewish Prostitute."

�� SANHEDRIN, 103a: "This passage suggests that Christ corrupted His morals and dishonored Himself."

�� SANHEDRIN, 107b: "This passage states that Christ seduced� and destroyed Israel."

�� HILKOTH MELAKHIM: Suggests that Christians sin by worshipping Jesus Christ.

�� HILKOTH MAAKHALOTH: "Christians are idolaters."

�� CHAGGIGAH, (15b): "A Jew is considered to be good in the eyes of God, in spite of any sins he may commit."

�� BABHA KAMA (113b): "The name of God not profaned, if a Jew lies to a Christian."

�� KELHUBATH (11a‑11b): "When a grown‑up man has had intercourse with a little girl...It means this: When a GROWN UP MAN HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A LITTLE GIRL IT IS NOTHING, for when the girl is less than this THREE YEARS OLD it is as if one puts the finger into the eye tears come to the eye again and again, SO DOES VIRGINITY COME BACK TO THE LITTLE GIRL THREE YEARS OLD."

�� TRACT MECHILLA: "Almighty GOD STUDIES THE TALMUD STANDING, because He has such respect for that book."

�� SANHEDRIN (59a) & ABOHODAH ZARAH 8‑6: "Every goy [non‑Jew] who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die."

�� SIMEON HADDARSEN fol. 56‑D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

�� MIDRASCH TALPIOTH 225‑L: "Jehovah created the non‑ Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non‑Jew is consequently an animal in human form, condemned to serve Jews day and night."

�� NADARINE, 20, B; SCHULCHAN ARUCH, CHOSZEN HAMISZPAT 348: "A Jew may do to a non‑Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat."

�� JOSIAH 60, 6, RABBI ABARBANEL to DANIEL 7, 13: "As soon as the King Messiah will declare himself, and He will destroy Rome and make a wilderness of it. Thorns and weeds will grow in the Pope's palace. The He will start a merciless war on non‑Jews and will overpower them. He will slay them in masses, kill their kings and lay waste the whole Roman land. He will say to the Jews: 'I am the King Messiah for whom you have been waiting. Take the silver and gold from the goyim."

�� SZAALOTH‑UTSZABOT THE BOOK OF JORE DIA 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the goyim [non‑ Jew] asks if our books contain anything against them."

� SCHULCHAN ARUCH CHOSZEN HAMISZPAT 348: "A Jew may rob a goy [non‑Jew] that is, he may cheat him in a bill, if unlikely to be perceived by him."

�� SCHULCHAN ARUCH CHOSZEN HAMISZPAT 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples [This he Jews use for justification to steal the land of the Palestinians]. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to mortality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general."

�� TOSEFTA, ERUBIN VIII, 1: "On the house of the goy [non‑ Jew] one looks as on the fold of cattle."

�� TOSEFTA, ABHODAH ZARAH VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy [non‑Jew] is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."

�� SCHULCHAN ARUCH EDIT, I, 136: "All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day of reconciliation till the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent of beforehand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all."

�� SCHULCHAN ARUCH ORACH CHAIM 539: "At the time of the Cholhamoed the transaction of any kind of business is forbidden. But it is permitted to cheat a goy [non‑Jew], because cheating of goyi at any time pleases the Lord."

�� SCHULCHAN ARUCH CHOSZEN HAMISZPAT 388: "IT IS PERMITTED TO KILL A JEWISH DENUNCIATOR every-where. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

�� LIVORE DAVID 37: "If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death."

�� ABHODAH ZARAH 26b TOSEPHOTH: "A JEW WHO KILLS A CHRISTIAN COMMITS NO SIN, BUT OFFERS AN ACCEPTABLE SACRIFICE TO GOD."

And on and on, and on it goes, for 63 volummes of filth and blasphemy. This is what the Jews are taught in their synagogues.

Do you after reading these words, believe the Christian religion got its start from this kind of blasphemy and filth? This is what the Judeo-Christian ["Minister"] teach, when he tells you that we have a Judeo‑Christian culture.

���������������������������������� Chapter Four

������� PUBLICATIONS SHOWING THE JEWS

����� TO BE KHAZARS AND NOT ISRAELITES

"It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew's ancestors 'never' lived in Palestine 'at all,' WHICH WITNESSES THE POWER OF HISTORICAL ASSERTION OVER FACT." ^[68]

In addition, under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following:

"STRICTLY SPEAKING IT IS INCORRECT TO CALL AN ANCIENT ISRAELITE A 'JEW' OR TO CALL A CONTEMPORARY JEW AN ISRAELITE OR A HEBREW." ^[69]

The World Book omits any reference to the Jews, but under the word Semite it states:

"Semite...Semites are those who speak Semitic languages. In this sense the ancient Hebrews, Assyrians, Phoenicians, and Cartaginians were Semites. The Arabs and some Ethiopians are modern Semitic‑speaking people. Modern Jews are often called Semites, but this name properly applies ONLY TO THOSE WHO USE THE HEBREW LANGUAGE. The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, BUT THEY HAVE MIXED WITH OTHER PEOPLES UNTIL THE NAME 'JEW' HAS LOST ALL RACIAL MEANING."

There are hundreds of books {most of which are Jewish Encyclopedias and history books} available for study, which prove that over 90% of the Jews of the world ARE NOT A SEMITIC PEOPLE, but few people other than historians ever bother to read them. Following are just a few:

THE HISTORY OF THE JEWISH KHAZARS, by D.M. Dunlop, pp. 4-15.

���� "...Our first question here is, When did the Khazars and the Khazar name appear? There has been considerable discussion as to the relation of the Khazars to the Huns on the one hand and to the West Turks on the other. The prevalent opinion has for some time been that the Khazars emerged from the West Turkish empire.

���� Early references to the Khazars appear about the time when the West Turks cease to be mentioned. Thus they are reported to have joined forces with the Greek Emperor Heraclius against the Persians in A.D. 627 and to have materially assisted him in the siege of Tiflis. it is a question whether the Khazars were at this time under West Turk supremacy. The chronicler Theophanes {died circa A.D. 818} who tells the story introduces them as 'the Turks from the east whom they call Khazars.'...

���� A similar discussion on the merits of the different races is reported from the days before Muhammad, in which the speakers are the Arab Nu'man ibn-al-Mudhir of al-Hirah and Khusraw Anushirwan. The Persian gives his opinion that the Greeks, Indians, and Chinese are superior to the Arabs and so also, in spite of their low material standards of life, the Turks and the Khazars, who at least possess an organization under their kings. Here again the Khazars are juxtaposed with the great nations of the east.

���� It is consonant with this that tales were told of how ambassadors from the Chinese, the Turks, and the Khazars were constantly at Khusraw's gate, ^[70] and even that he kept three thrones of gold in his palace, which were never removed and on which none sat, reserved for the kings of Byzantium, China and the Khazars.

���� In general, the material in the Arabic and Persian writers with regard to the Khazars in early times falls roughly into three groups, centering respectively round the names of (a) one or other of the Hebrew patriarchs, (b) Alexander the Great, and (c) certain of the Sassanid kings, especially, Anushirwan and his immediate successors.

���� A typical story of the first group is given by Ya'qubi in his History. After the confusion of tongues at Babel ^[71], the descendants of Noah came to Peleg ^[72], son of Eber ^[73], and asked him to divide ^[74] the earth among them. He apportioned to the descendants of Japheth ^[75] - China, Hind, Sind, the country of the Turks and that of the Khazars, as well as Tibet, the country of the (Volga) Bulgars, Daylam, and the country neighboring on Khurasan.

���� In another passage Ya'qubi gives a kind of sequel to this. Peleg ^[76] having divided the earth in this fashion ^[77], the descendants of 'Amur ibn-Tubal ^[78], a son of Japheth, went out to the northeast. One group, the descendants of Togarmah ^[79], proceeding farther north, were scattered in different countries and became a number of kingdoms, among them the Burjan (Bulgars), Alans, Khazars (Ashkenaz ^[80]), and Armenians.

���� Similarly, according to Tabari, there were born to Japheth Jim-r (the Biblical Gomer ^[81]), Maw'-' (read Mawgh-gh, Magog ^[82]), Mawday (Madai ^[83]), Yawan (Javan) ^[84]), Thubal (Tubal), Mash-j (read Mash-kh, Meshech ^[85]) and Tir-sh (Tiras ^[86]). Of the descendants of the last were the Turks and the Khazars (Ashkenaz).

���� There is possibly an association here with the Turgesh, survivors of the West Turks, who were defeated by the Arabs in 119/737, ^[87] and disappeared as a ruling group in the same century. Tabari says curiously that of the descendants of Mawgh-gh (Magog) were Yajuj and Majuj, adding that these are to the east of the Turks and Khazars. This information would invalidate Zeki Validi's attempt to identify Gog and Magog in the Arabic writers with the Norwegians. The name Mash-kh (Meshech) is regarded by him as probably a singular to the classical Massagetai (Massag-et). A Bashmakov emphasizes the connection of 'Meshech' with the Khazars, to establish his theory of the Khazars, not as Turks from inner Asia, but what he calls a Jephetic or Alarodian group from south of the Caucasus.

���� Evidently there is no stereotyped form of this legendary relationship of the Khazars to Japheth. The Taj-al-Artis says that according to some they are the descendants of Kash-h (? Mash-h or Mash-kh, for Meshech), son of Japheth, and according to others both the Khazars and the Saqalibah are sprung from Thubal (Tubal). Further, we read of Balanjar ibn-Japheth in ibn-al-Faqih and abu-al-Fida' as the founder of the town of Balanjar. Usage leads one to suppose that this is equivalent to giving Balanjar a separate racial identity. In historical times Balanjar was a well-known Khazar center, which is even mentioned by Masudi as their capital.������ It is hardly necessary to cite more of these Japheth stories. Their JEWISH origin IS priori OBVIOUS, and Poliak has drawn attention to one version of the division of the earth, where the Hebrew words for 'north' and 'south' actually appear in the Arabic text. The Iranian cycle of legend had a similar tradition, according to which the hero Afridun divided the earth among his sons, Tuj (sometimes Tur, the eponym of Turan), Salm, and Iraj. Here the Khazars appear with the Turks and the Chinese in the portion assigned to Tuj, the eldest son. Some of the stories connect the Khazars with Abraham.

���� The tale of a meeting in Khurasan between the sons of Keturah ^[88] and the Khazars (Ashkenaz ^[89]) where the Khaqan is Khaqan is mentioned is quoted from the Sa'd and al-Tabari by Poliak.

���� The tradition also appears in the Meshed manuscript of ibn-al-Faqih, apparently as part of the account of Tamim ibn-Babr's journey to the Uigurs, but it goes back to Hishim al-Kalbi. Zeki Validi is inclined to lay some stress on it as a real indication of the presence of the Khazars in this region at an early date. Al-Jahiz similarly refers to the legend of the sons of Abraham and Keturah settling in Khurasan but does not mention the Khazars. Al-Di-mashqi says that according to one tradition the Turks were the children of Abraham by Keturah, whose father belonged to the original Arab stock. Descendants of other sons of Abraham, namely the Soghdians and the Kirgiz, were also said to live beyond the Oxus..."

BENJAMIN FREEMAN, FACTS ARE FACTS.

"CHAZARS: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the HISTORY OF THE JEWS OF RUSSIA...driven on by the nomadic tribes of the steppes and by their own desire for plunder and revenge... In the second half of the sixth century the Chazars moved westward...The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of south Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians...At this time the kingdom of the Chazars stood at the height of its power and was constantly at war...At the end of the eighth century...the chagan (king) of the Chazars and his grandees, TOGETHER WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF HIS HEATHEN PEOPLE, EMBRACED THE JEWISH RELIGION"

ENCYCLOPEDIA AMERICANA (1985):

"Khazar, an ancient Turkic‑speaking people who ruled a large and powerful state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century to their demise in the mid‑ 11th century A.D...In the 8th Century it's political and religious head...as well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility, abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism..."

ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA (15th edition):

"Khazars, confederation of Turkic and Iranian tribes that established a major commercial empire in the second half of the 6th century, covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia...In the middle of the 8th century the ruling classes adopted Judaism as their religion."

ACADEMIC AMERICAN ENCYCLOPEDIA (1985):

"Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are one of the two major divisions of the Jews, the other being the Shephardim."

ENCYCLOPEDIA AMERICANA (1985):

"Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are the Jews whose ancestors lived in German lands...it was among Ashkenazi Jews that the idea of political Zionism emerged, leading ultimately to the establishment of the state of Israel...In the late 1960s, Ashkenazi Jews numbered some 11 million, about 84 percent of the world Jewish population."

THE JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA:

"Khazars, a NON‑SEMITIC,Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, WHO WERE CONVERTED AS AN ENTIRE NATION TO JUDAISM in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish‑speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania."

THE ENCYCLOPEDIA JUDAICA (1972):

"Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries C.E. DURING PART OF THIS TIME THE LEADING KHAZARS PROFESSED JUDAISM... In spite of the negligible information of an archaeological nature, the presence of Jewish groups and the impact of Jewish ideas in Eastern Europe are considerable during the Middle Ages. Groups have been mentioned as migrating to Central Europe from the East often have been referred to as Khazars, thus making it impossible to overlook the possibility that they originated from within the former Khazar Empire."

THE UNIVERSAL JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA:

"Khazars, a medieval people, probably related to the Volga Bulgars, WHOSE RULING CLASS ADOPTED JUDAISM DURING THE 8th cent. The Khazars seem to have emerged during the 6th cent., from the vast nomadic Hun (Turki) empire which stretched from the steppes of Eastern Europe and the Volga basin to the Chinese frontier. Although it is often claimed that allusions to the Khazars are found as early as 200 C.E., actually they are not mentioned until 627... MOST JEWISH HISTORIANS DATE THE CONVERSION OF THE KHAZAR KING TO JUDAISM DURING THE FIRST HALF OF THIS CENTURY {A.D.}..."

The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz...Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim...About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim. The Bible relates that the Khazar (Ashkenaz) Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem:

"Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth;...the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz..." ^[90]

So the Bible verifies that the Ashkenaz Jews [Khazars] are not the descendants of Shem and cannot be Semite.

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE'S ENCYCLOPEDIA for 1954 at 15‑292 records the following in reference to the Khazars:

"IN THE YEAR 740 A.D. THE KHAZARS WERE OFFICIALLY CONVERTED TO JUDAISM. A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic‑ speaking people and were scattered over central Europe WHERE THEY WERE KNOWN AS JEWS. It is from this grouping that most German, Polish and Hungarian Jews are descended, and they likewise make up a considerable part of that population now found in America. The term Aschenazim is applied to this round‑headed, dark‑complexioned division."����

ACADEMIC AMERICAN ENCYCLOPEDIA, Deluxe Library Edition, Volume 12, page 66 states:

"The Khazars, a turkic people, created a commercial and political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of the 7th through 10th centuries. DURING THE 8th CENTURY THE KHAZAR ARISTOCRACY AND THE KAGAN(KING) WERE CONVERTED TO JUDAISM."

THE NEW ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, Volume 6, page 836 relates:

"Khazar, member of a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes that in the late 6th century A.D. established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia...BUT THE MOST STRIKING CHARACTERISTIC OF THE KHAZARS WAS THE APPARENT ADOPTION OF JUDAISM BY THE KHAGAN AND THE GREATER PART OF THE RULING CLASS IN ABOUT 740...THE FACT ITSELF, HOWEVER, IS UNDISPUTED AND UNPARALLELED IN THE HISTORY OF CENTRAL EURASIA. A FEW SCHOLARS HAVE ASSERTED THAT THE JUDAIZED KHAZARS WERE THE REMOTE ANCESTORS OF MANY OF THE JEWS OF EASTERN EUROPE AND RUSSIA."

COLLIER'S ENCYCLOPEDIA, Volume 14, page 65 states:

"Khazars [kaza'rz], a semi-nomadic tribe of Turkish or Tatar origin who first appeared north of the Caucasus in the early part of the third century...IN THE EIGHTH CENTURY KHAGHAN BULAN DECIDED IN FAVOR OF THE JEWS AND ACCEPTED JUDAISM FOR HIMSELF AND FOR HIS PEOPLE..."

NEW CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA, Volume VIII, page 173 relates:

"The Khazars were an ethnic group, belonging to the Turkish peoples, who, toward the end of the 2d century of the Christian Era, had settled in the region between the Caucasus and the lower Volga and Don Rivers...At the beginning of the 8th century, dynastic ties bound the Khazars more closely to Constantinople, which led to a limited spread of Christianity among them. They also became acquainted with Judaism from the numerous Jews who lived in the Crimea and along the Bosphorus. When the Byzantine Emperor, Leo the Isaurian, persecuted the Jews in A.D. 723, many Jews found refuge in the Khazar kingdom, and THEIR INFLUENCE WAS SO GREAT THAT, AROUND THE MIDDLE OF THE 8th CENTURY, THE KING OF THE KHAZARS AND MANY OF THE KHAZAR NOBILITY ACCEPTED THE JEWISH FAITH."

THE CADILLAC MODERN ENCYCLOPEDIA, page 822, states:

"Khazars (khah'-zahrz), a S Russian people of Turkic origin, who at the height of their power (during the 8th-10th cent., A.D.) controlled an empire which included Crimea, and extended along the lower Volga, as far E as the Caspian Sea. THE KHAZAR ROYAL FAMILY AND ARISTOCRACY CONVERTED TO JUDAIMS DURING THE REIGN OF KING BULAN (768-809 A.D.) AND JUDAISM WAS THEREAFTER REGARDED AS THE STATE RELIGION..."

From the above, we can clearly see that the Jews fully understand their Khazarian heritage as the third edition of THE JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA for 1925 records:

���� "CHAZARS [Khazars]: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of Russia. The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians (855).

���� Jews have lived on the shores of the Black and Caspian seas since the first centuries of the common era [after the death of Christ]. Historical evidence points to the region of the Ural as the home of the Chazars. Among the classical writers of the Middle Ages they were known as the 'Chozars,' 'Khazirs,' 'Akatzirs,' and 'Akatirs,' and in the Russian chronicles as 'Khwalisses' and 'Ugry Byelyye.'..."

Nathan M. Pollock has a beef with the Israeli government. His elaborate plans to celebrate this September the 1000th anniversary of the Jewish ‑ Khazar alliance were summarily rejected. An elderly, meek‑looking man who migrated to Israel from Russia 43 years ago. He has devoted 40 of his 64 years trying to prove that six out of ten Israelis and none out of ten Jews in the Western Hemisphere are real Jews' Jews. But descendants of fierce Khazar tribes which roamed the steppes of Southern Russia many centuries ago. For obvious reasons the Israeli authorities are not at all eager to give the official stamp of approval to Pollock's theories.

"For all we know, he may be 100 percent right,' said a senior government official. 'In fact, he is not the first one to discover the connection between Jews and Khazars. Many famous scholars Jews and non‑Jews, stressed these links in their historical research works. But who can tell today what percentage of Khazar blood flows in our veins..." ^[91]

Following is the story of the conversion of a tribe of people in Russia to Judaism and is the origin of more than 95% of the Jews of Eastern Europe.

FACTS ARE FACTS, By Benjamin Freedman).

���� "Without a complete and accurate knowledge of the origin and history of the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe...it is quite impossible for [Christians] to intelligently understand the harmful influence the Jews have exerted for ten centuries...You will probably be astonished as many Christians were years ago when I electrified the nation with the first publication by me of the facts disclosed by my many years of research into the origin and the history of the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe.

���� My many years of intensive research established beyond the question of any doubt, contrary to the generally accepted belief held by Christians, that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe at any time in their history in Eastern Europe were never the legendary 'lost ten tribes' of Bible lore. THAT HISTORIC FACT IS INCONTROVERTIBLE. Relentless research established as equally true that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe AT NO TIME IN THEIR HISTORY COULD BE CORRECTLY REGARDED AS THE DIRECT LINEAL DESCENDANTS OF THE LEGENDARY 'LOST TEN TRIBES' OF BIBLE LORE. THE 'JEWS' in Eastern Europe in modern history CANNOT LEGITIMATELY POINT TO A SINGLE ANCIENT ANCESTOR WHO EVER SET EVEN A FOOT ON THE SOIL OF PALESTINE IN THE ERA OF BIBLE HISTORY. Research also revealed that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe WERE NEVER 'SEMITES,' are NOT 'SEMITES' NOW, NOR CAN THEY EVER BE REGARDED AS 'SEMITES' AT ANY FUTURE TIME BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe are the legendary 'Chosen People' so very vocally publicized by the Christian clergy from their pulpits..."

The Jewish author, Arthur Koestler, relates the following concerning Jewish history: In his 1976 best seller THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE, the Author of Darkness at Noon, Promise and Fulfillment, and The Roots of Coincidence dropped another bombshell by proving that today's Jews were, for the most part, descendants of Khazars, who converted to Judaism seven centuries after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.

"This, of course, is inspired by the story of the Covenant in Genesis; and it implies that THE KHAZARS TOO CLAIMED THE STATUS OF A CHOSEN RACE, who made their own Covenant with the Lord, EVEN THOUGH THEY [Khazars] WERE NOT DESCENDED FROM ABRAHAM'S SEED...HE CANNOT, AND DOES NOT, CLAIM FOR THEM [the Khazars] SEMITIC DESCENT; HE TRACES THEIR [Khazars] ANCESTRY NOT TO SHEM, BUT TO NOAH'S THIRD SON, JAPHETH; OR MORE PRECISELY TO JAPHETH'S GRANDSON, TOGARMA, THE ANCESTOR OF ALL TURKISH TRIBES. 'We have found in the family registers of our fathers,' Joseph asserts boldly, 'that Togarma had ten sons, and the names of their off-spring are as follows: Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazars, Zagora, Bulgars, Sabir. WE [Khazars] ARE THE SONS OF KHAZAR, THE SEVENTH...'" ^[92]

Jewish author Alfred M. Lilienthal (THE ZIONIST CONNECTION II, pages 759‑768) relates the following concerning Jewish history:

���� "...'The existence of [The State of] ISRAEL IS NOT FOUNDED ON LOGIC. IT HAS NO ORDINARY LEGITIMACY. There is neither in its establishment nor present scope any evident justice ‑ though there may be an utter need and wondrous fulfillment.'...

���� Arthur Koestler answers this question with an emphatic 'NO!' In his 1976 best seller The Thirteenth Tribe, the Author of Darkness at Noon, Promise and Fulfillment, and The Roots of Coincidence dropped another bombshell by PROVING THAT TODAY'S JEWS WERE, FOR THE MOST PART, DESCENDANTS OF KHAZARS, WHO CONVERTED TO JUDAISM SEVEN CENTURIES AFTER THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM IN 70 A.D...Therefore, the great majority of EASTERN EUROPEAN JEWS ARE NOT SEMITIC JEWS AT ALL, and as most Western European Jews came from East Europe, MOST OF THEM ALSO ARE NOT SEMITIC JEWS. Thus, maintains Koestler, the veins of 45 percent of Israelis (save only the Arab and the Sephardic Jews), plus a big majority of JEWS AROUND THE WORLD, ARE UTTERLY VACANT OF CORPUSCULAR LINKS TO THE TRIBE OF MOSES AND SOLOMON...

���� The Koestler thesis, however startling, IS IN NO WISE A NEW ONE. THE GENETIC KHAZAR DERIVATION OF MOST JEWS, ONLY THE SEPHARDIC MAY BE ACCOUNTED HEBREWS BY BLOOD, HAS BEEN LONG IF NOT WIDELY KNOWN...

���� The home to which Weismann, Silver, Ben‑Gurion and so many other Ashkenazim Zionists have long yearned to return HAS most likely NEVER BEEN THEIRS...[it is an] anthropological fact, MANY CHRISTIANS MAY HAVE MUCH MORE HEBREW‑ISRAELITE BLOOD IN THEIR VEINS THAN MOST OF THEIR JEWISH NEIGHBORS!

���� Ironically enough, too, Volume IV of the Jewish Encyclopedia (as of the time of research, 1952), because this publication spelled Khazars with a 'C' instead of a 'K,' is titled 'Chazars to Dreyfus.'. And it was the famed trial of Captain Alfred Dreyfus, as interpreted by Theodore Herzl, that made the modern Jewish Khazars of Russia...forget their descent from converts to Judaism...to establish the State of Israel...AND WITH OUT THE HUE AND CRY, 'ANTI‑SEMITISM,' PRAY WHAT HAPPENS TO THE ZIONIST MOVEMENT? Khazar conversion was not unique...

���� WHO CAN SAY FOR SURE THAT MANY CHRISTIAN READERS OF THIS BOOK MIGHT NOT IN FACT HAVE A BETTER CLAIM, WHICH THEY DO NOT CHOOSE TO EXERCISE, TO GO BACK 'HOME' TO PALESTINE THAN HANNAH SEMER, MENACHEM BEGIN, OR GOLDA MEIR? QUEEN VICTORIA HERSELF BELONGED TO AN ISRAELITE SOCIETY THAT TRACED THE ANCESTRY OF ITS MEMBERSHIP BACK TO THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL. When the word 'Judaism' was born, THERE WAS NO LONGER A HEBREW‑ISRAELITE STATE. THE PEOPLE WHO EMBRACED THE CREED OF JUDAISM WERE ALREADY A MIXTURE OF MANY NATIONS, RACES, AND STRAINS, AND THIS DIVERSIFICATION WAS RAPIDLY GROWING..."

ANTIQUITIES OF THE JEWS, by Josephus, Book 13, ch. 9, sec. 1:

"...Hyrcanus...took Medaba...Samega, and the neighboring places, and, besides these, Shechem and Gerizzim, and the nation of the Cutheans, who dwelt at the temple which resembled that temple which was at Jerusalem...which temple was now deserted two hundred years after it was built. Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of idumea, and subdued all the Idumeans (Edomite Jews); and...they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Jewish ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that THEY WERE HEREAFTER NO OTHER THAN JEWS."

THE CONQUEST OF A CONTINENT, by Madison Grant, pp. 224-225:

"It was in this period that the Polish Jews began their tumultuous and frantic invasion, a flood which only recently has been checked, and that with the greatest difficulty. The great mass of immigrants from South Poland, Galicia, and Russia WERE ASHKANAZIM JEWS, DESCENDANTS IN PART OF ALPINE KHOZARS(Khazars), WITH A MONGOL ADMIXTURE, who entered the eastern Ukraine from Asia in the early centuries of our era. Many of THE KHOZARS and their Khan WERE CONVERTED BY JEWISH MISSIONARIES AND THEY FORMALLY ACCEPTED JUDAISM IN 740 A.D. It is doubtful whether there is a single drop of the old Palestinian, Semantic-speaking Hebrew blood among these East European Jews. They are essentially a non-European people. The language they speak, Judisch, or Yiddish, is a corrupt German of the Franconian dialect mixed with Slavic and Hebrew elements, which fact strengthens the tradition of a large migration of German Jews into Poland in the Middle Ages. It may be that the strain of these German Jews has died out, leaving only their language behind, but in any event the Polish Jews are now distinctly Alpine: a mixture of Slavs and of Asiatic invaders of Russia...The German Jews, who also came into this country in smaller numbers at the end of the last century, were of the Alpine type, closely resembling those from Poland, Galicia, and Russia. All of these Jews are in sharp contrast to the Sephardim Jews, a superior group, largely Mediterranean in race, a very few of whom came from Holland to America in Colonial times. These latter had reached Spain by way of North Africa and later fled to Holland to escape the Inquisition."

THE IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA, By John Beaty, pp. 15-16.

In the later years of the dimly recorded first millennium of the Christian era, Slavic people of several kindred tribes occupied the land which became known later as the north central portion of European Russia.

South of them between the Don and Volga rivers and north of the lofty Caucasus Mountains lived a people known to history as Khazars ^[93].

These people had been driven westward from Central Asia and entered Europe by the corridor between the Ural Mountains and the Caspian Sea. They found a land occupied by primitive pastoral people of a score or more of tribes, a land which law beyond the boundaries of the Roman Empire at its greatest extent under Trajan (ruled, 98-117 A.D.), and also beyond the boundaries of the Byzantine Empire (395-1453).

By slow stages the Khazars extended their territory eventually to the Sea of Azov and the adjacent littoral of the Black Sea. The Khazars were apparently a people of mixed stock with Mongol and Turkic affinities. Around the year 600, a belligerent tribe of half-Mongolian people, similar to the modern Turks, conquered the territory of what is now Southern Russia. Before long the kingdom (khanate) of the Khazars, as this tribe was known, stretched form the Caspian to the Black Sea. Its capital, Ityl, was at the mouth of the Volga River. ^[94]

In the eighth or ninth century of our era, a khakan (or chagan, roughly equivalent to tribal chief or primitive king) of the Khazars wanted a religion for his pagan people. Partly, perhaps, because of incipient tension between Christians and the adherents of the new Mohammedan faith (Mohammed died in 632), and partly because of fear of becoming subject to the power of the Byzantine emperor or the Islamic caliph ^[95], he adopted a form of the Jewish religion at a date generally placed at 741 A.D., but believed by Vernadsky to be as late as 865.

According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (Vol. VI, pp. 375-377), this chieftain, probably Bulan,

"called upon the representatives of Judaism, Christianity and Mohammedanism to expound their doctrines before him. This discussion convinced him that the Jewish faith was the most preferable, and he decided to embrace it. Thereupon he and about 4,000 Khazars were circumcised; it was only by degrees that the Jewish teachings gained a foothold among the population."

In His History of the Jews ^[96], Professor H. Graetz gives further details:

"A successor of Bulan, who bore the Hebrew name of Obadiah, was the first to make serious efforts to further the Jewish religion. He invited Jewish sages to settle in his dominions, rewarded them royally, founded synagogues and schools...caused instruction to be given to himself and his people in the Torah and the Talmud, and introduced a divine service modeled on the ancient communities. After Obadiah came a long series of Jewish chagans, for according to a fundamental law of the state only Jewish rulers were permitted to ascend the throne."

The rabbis sent for by Khakan Obadiah were educated in and were zealots for the Babylonian Talmud, which after long labors by many hands had been completed on December 2, 499.

In the thousands of synagogues which were built in the Khazar khanate, the imported rabbis and their successors were in complete control of the political, social and religious thought of their people.

So significant was the Babylonian Talmud as the principal cause of Khazar resistance to Russian efforts to end their political and religious separatism, and so significant also are the modern sequels, including those in the United States, that an extensive quotation on the subject from the great History of the Jews, by Professor H. Graetz (Vol. II, 1893, pp. 631ff.) is here presented:

���� "The Talmud must not be regarded as an ordinary work, composed of twelve volumes; it possesses absolutely no similarity to any other literary production, but forms without any figure of speech, a world of its own, which must be judged by its peculiar laws...

���� The Talmud contains much that is frivolous of which it treats with great gravity and seriousness; it further reflects the various superstitious practices and views of its Persian birthplace which presume the efficacy of demonical medicines, of magic, incantations, miraculous cures, and interpretations of dreams...It also contains isolated instances of uncharitable judgments and decrees against the members of other nations and religions (especially Christians), and finally it favors an incorrect exposition of the scriptures, accepting, as it does, tasteless misrepresentations.

���� More than six centuries lie petrified in the Talmud...Small wonder then, that...the sublime and the common, the great and the small, the grave and the ridiculous, the altar and the ashes, the Jewish and the Heathenish, be discovered side by side...The Babylonian Talmud is especially distinguished from the Jerusalem or Palestine Talmud by the flights of thought, the penetration of mind, the flashes of genius, which rise and vanish again...It was for this reason that the Babylonian rather than the Jerusalem Talmud became the fundamental possession of the Jewish people, its life breath, its very soul ...nature and mankind, powers and events, were for the Jewish nation insignificant, non-essential, a mere phantom; the only true reality was the Talmud."

Not merely educated by the Talmud but actually living the life of its Babylonian background, which they may have regarded with increased devotion because most of the Jews of Mesopotamia had embraced Islam, the rabbi-governed Khazars had no intention whatever of losing their identity by becoming Russianized or Christian. The intransigent attitude of the rabbis was increased by their realization that their power would be lost if their people accepted controls other than Talmudic.

These controls by rabbis were responsible not only for basic mores, but for such externals as the peculiarities of dress and hair. It has been frequently stated by writers on the subject that the "ghetto" was the work not of Russians or other Slavs but of rabbis, so they could retain their control over the lesser Jews.

Perhaps, now, it can be understood why The World Book Encyclopedia by the following, states:

"The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until THE NAME JEW HAS LOST ALL RACIAL MEANING."

���� JUDEO-CHRISTIAN HERITAGE IS A HOAX: It appears there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians.

That "Judeo-Christian dialogue" in this context is also absurd was well stated in the author-initiative religious journal, Judaism, Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote:

"As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism BECAUSE IT REJECTS CHRISTIANITY; and Christianity is Christianity BECAUSE IT REJECTS JUDAISM. What is usually referred to as the JEWISH-CHRISTIAN TRADITIONS EXISTS ONLY IN CHRISTIAN OR SECULARIST FANTASY."

There is no doubt this is true! And the fantasy exists in Christian and Secularist minds only because it was implanted there by the persistent propaganda of the masters of intrigue of the ADL-AJC Network.

Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that knowledgeable theologians, Jewish and Christians who constantly allude to "our Judeo-Christian heritage" are for their own specious purposes perpetuate a grotesque and fantastic hoax.

Boston: A Harvard Divinity School professor, John Strugnell, was removed this week as chief editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls not only because of his poor health, but because of a tirade against Israel and Judaism, his colleagues said.

The remarks, in which he called Judaism "a horrible religion" that "should have disappeared," came as a surprise to some colleagues working with him to decipher the ancient texts of the Old Testament. Strugnell made the remarks in a recent interview published in Haaretz, a Tel Aviv newspaper.

In the Haaretz interview, Strugnell, 60, said he was not against Jews but their religion, according to an account soon to be published in the Biblical Archaeology Review. "I can't allow the word anti-Semitism to be used," he is quoted as saying, "Anti-Judaist, that's what I am."

The Encyclopedia Americana calls Hyrcanus a Jewish high priest [135‑105 B.C.] who forced the Idumeans to become "Jews." Idumea is the Greek for Edomites.

The works of Josephes relates how the Idumeans were forced to accept Judaism. In the Bible Esau, Edo, Mt. Seir and Idumea are interchangeable for the offspring of ESAU, Jacob's twin brother.

So you see the people known as "Jews" today are NOT the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; but are usurpers trying to gain an inheritance that is not theirs.

The Encyclopedia Americana calls Hyrcanus a Jewish high priest [135‑105 B.C.] who forced the Idumeans to become "Jews." Idumea is the Greek for Edomites. The works of Josephes relates how the Idumeans were forced to accept Judaism.

In the Bible Esau, Edo, Mt. Seir and Idumea are inter-changeable for the offspring of ESAU, Jacob's twin brother. Between the time of Nehemiah and the birth of Christ, the problem of intermarriage increased.

The climax of the problem came about a century and a half before the birth of Christ, when the Judean, John Hyrcanus, conquered the heathen cities in Palestine and forced the Canaanites to become Judeans ["Jews"].

Josephus, the Judean historian, writing in about 95 A.D. wrote of this:

"Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea [Greek form of Edom], and subdued all the Idumaeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would be circumcised, and make use of the laws of the Judeans; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Judean ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, they were hereafter no other than Judeans." ^[97]

A footnote in Josephus quotes Ammonius, an ancient grammarian, who says further:

"The Judeans are such by nature, and from the beginning, whilst the Idumaeans were not Judeans from the beginning, but Phoenicians and Syrians; but being afterward subdued by the Judeans and compelled to be circumcised, and to unite into one nation, and be subject to the same laws, they were called Judeans."

This same footnote also quotes Dio, the ancient historian:

"That country is also called Judea, and the people Judeans; and this name is given also to as many as embrace their religion, though of other nations."

Josephus continues his history of how the Judahites incorporated the Edomites and Canaanites and a history of the son of Hyrcanus named Aristobulus:

"He was called a lover of the Grecians; and had conferred many benefits on his own country, and made war against Iturea, and added a great part of it to Judea, and compelled its inhabitants if they would continue in that country, to be circumcised, and to live according to the Judean laws ^[98]; "Now at this time the Judeans were in possession of the following cities that had belonged to the Syrians, and Idumeans, and Phoenicians: [Here he lists 23 non‑Israelite cities]; which last [city] they utterly destroyed, because its inhabitants would not bear to change their religious rites for those peculiar to the Judeans. The Judeans also possessed others of the principle cities of Syria, which had been destroyed." ^[99]

This all took place at least a century before Christ. It is obvious, then, that by the time Christ was born a great host of the people living in Judea were Canaanites and Edomites by race, although they were Jews by religion and Judeans by citizenship. Even the ruling dynasty of the Herods were Edomites. Josephus speaks of:

"Herod, who was no more than a private man, and an Idumean, i.e., a half‑Judean." ^[100]

A footnote here says:

"Accordingly, Josephus always esteems him an Idumean, though he says his father Antipater was of the same people with the Judeans, and a Judean by birth, as indeed all such proselytes of justice as the Idumeans, were in time esteemed the very same people with the Judeans."

The Esau‑Edomite nation ["Idumea"] ceased to exist as a separate nation at this point in history. And yet the Bible is clear that Edom would be the enemy of Israel in the latter days.

How could these prophecies be fulfilled, if there are no Edomites left in the world? There is only one nation in the world that can prove ancestral ties with Edom, and the Jews themselves claim that dubious distinction.

The Jews have thus adopted the materialistic and anti‑Christ attitude that characterized the father of the Edomites,

Esau. As judgment for their sins, including that of the Crucifixion of Christ, God cast them out of Palestine in 70 A.D. whereupon they fled to North Africa and Spain. We find what happened to them in The American People's Encyclopedia for 1954, page 15‑492, under "The Jews."

"Following their dispersal many spread across North Africa to Spain and during this movement converted many of the Berber tribes to Judaism. This had little effect on physical type, since most of the Berbers were likewise of that Mediterranean Race. That portion which moved into Spain and later northward achieved considerable wealth and prestige and became known as SEPHARDIM JEWS."

THE OUTLINE OF HISTORY. H. G. Wells,

"It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew's ancestors 'never' lived in Palestine 'at all,' which witnesses the power of historical assertion over fact."������

In Genesis 3:15 we are told:

"And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed..."

The important thing to note is that there are two lines of descent here - the seed or descendants of the serpent (Satan), and the other, the descendants of Eve (the woman). The word "woman" is used later in Scripture to describe those who comprise God's Kingdom. Satan, also, has a kingdom, for it says in Luke 11:18:

"If Satan also be divided against himself, how shall his kingdom stand?"

The subjects of his kingdom are obviously the seed of the serpent or Satan. Christ recognized the existence of this evil line when he blamed them for all the blood shed beginning with the slaying of Abel ^[101].

There are two kingdoms in the world today - the kingdom of good and the kingdom of evil; the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Satan.

We know that believers in Christ, or Christians, comprise God's Kingdom, but who are Satan's subjects? Let us see if we can identify them from the Scriptures.

There are a people or race which the Bible speaks of in various places as "enemies" of God, "filthy dreamers," "devils," "serpents," "enemies of all righteousness," "princes of this world," "those that are lost," "vipers," and "contrary to all men."

The blood of the true Judahite, who originally numbered little more than 40,000 had become thoroughly obliterated by the amalgamation of the people of Ashdod, Moabites, Ammonites, Perizzites, Jebuzites, Canaanites, Egyptians, Hittites, Amorites, Amalekites and finally Idumeans. It was the Idumeans who took control of the country of Judea and furnished the Herodian line of rulers.

Following is how the Pharisees came to be in "Moses' Seat" when Christ was born. They had many enemies at the beginning and the Sadducees were the first of these enemies. To see a "small" portion of the distortions of the Pharisees on the Bible, in eliminating the Chief Engineer, the God of Intelligence, planning, approachability is seen under the caption "History of the Pharisees," pages 665‑666, of the Jewish Encyclopedia.

Her brother, Simon ben Shetah, had been waiting for such an opportunity. The continued civil war resulted in the sons of Alexander Jannaeus, Hyrcanus and Aristobulus, in 63 B.C., going hat in hand to Pompey, Caesar's Roman General in Syria, asking him to invade Palestine and slaughter their respective opponents.

This is how Rome happened to be in power when Christ was born. The full story can be found in the Jewish Encyclopedia under "Pharisees."

���� "It is difficult to state at what time the Pharisees, as a party, arose, Josephus first mentions them in connection with Jonathan, the successor of Judas Maccabeus ^[102].

���� Under John Hyracanus (135‑105 B.C.) they appear as a powerful party opposing the Sadducean proclivities of the king, who had formerly been a disciple of theirs, though the story as told by Josephus is unhistorical ^[103]. The Hasmonean dynasty, with its worldly ambitions and aspirations, met with little support from the Pharisees, whose aim was the maintenance of a religious spirit in accordance with their interpretation of the Law. Under Alexander Jannaeus (104‑78 B.C.) the conflict between the people, siding with the Pharisees, and the king became bitter and ended in carnage ^[104]. Under his window Salome Alexander (78‑69 B.C.), the Pharisees, led by Simeon ben Shetah, came to power; they obtained seats in the Sanhedrin, and that time was afterward regarded as the golden age, full of the blessing of heaven. But the bloody vengeance they took upon the Sadducees led to a terrible reaction, and under Aristobulus (69‑63 B.C.) The Sadducees regained their power ^[105].

���� Amidst the bitter struggle which ensued, the Pharisees appeared before Pompey asking him to interfere and restore the old priesthood while abolishing the royalty of the Hasmoneans altogether ^[106].

���� The defilement of the Temple by Pompey was regarded by the Pharisees as a divine punishment of Sadducean misrule. After the national independence had been lost, the Pharisees gained in influence while the star of the Sadducees waned.

���� Herod found his chief opponents among the latter, and so he put the leaders of the Sanhedrin to death while endeavoring by a milder treatment to win the favor of the leaders of the Pharisees, who, through they refused to take the oath of allegiance, were otherwise friendly to him ^[107]. Only when he provoked their indignation by his heathen proclivities did the Pharisees become his enemies and fall victims (4 B.C.) to his bloodthirstiness ^[108].

���� But the family of Boethus, whom Herod had raised to the high‑priesthood, revived the spirit of the Sadducees, and thenceforth the Pharisees again had them as antagonists; still, they no longer possessed their former power, as the people always sided with the Pharisees ^[109].

���� In King Agrippa (41‑44 A.D.) the Pharisees had a supporter and friend, and with the destruction of the Temple, the Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees.

���� HENCEFORTH JEWISH LIFE WAS REGULATED BY THE TEACHINGS OF THE PHARISEES; the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of tradition supplanted the older, priestly tradition. PHARISAISM SHAPED THE CHARACTER OF JUDAISM AND THE LIFE AND THOUGHTS OF THE JEWS FOR ALL THE FUTURE."

Any Human characteristic such as Intelligence or Love is "obnoxious verbiage" when attributed to God, and was eliminated, explained away, and the shell kept for the Jews "shell game" of cheating the gullible Christian. Attributing Intelligence to God, is to the Jew an "anthropomor�phism," a big word for a pagan idea, the idea that humans alone are intelligent.

Judaism would best be described as a rite or compendium of rites, for, if one lends belief to the presentations of the Jewish lawgivers, one must bear in mind that they studied among the initiates of Babylon, and become the pupils of Chaldean magic who were the fathers of Voodooism, a name given to the magic practices and rites taught to the Babylonians by Saragon [Cain].

The closer one studies the history of the Jews, the clearer it appears that they are neither a religious entity nor a nation.

The absolute failure of Zionism which has been a desperate effort on the part of certain international Jewish leaders to bind all the Jews of the world into a national entity, whose territory would have been Palestine, proves the futility of such an effort. Judaism is not a religion and the Jews are not a nation, but they are a sect with Judaism as a rite.

The obligations and rules of the rite for the Jewish masses are contained in the Talmud and Schulchan Aruk, but the esoteric teachings for the higher initiates are to be found in the Cabala. Therein are contained the mysterious rites for evocations, the indications and keys to practices for conjuration of supernatural forces, the science of numbers, astrology, etc. Thus, all the vestiges of the ancient religion of Israel had been destroyed except certain ceremonial rites which were still allowed by the Idumeans.

At this point the Jews and Idumeans merged and became as one. The Jewish Encyclopedia 1925 - edition; under "Edom" states, "from this time the Idumeans ceased to be a separate people..."

���������������������������� THE KOL NIDRE

���� KOL NIDRE: It is the prologue of the Day of Atonement services in the synagogues. It is recited three times by the standing congregation in concert with chanting rabbis at the alter. After the recital of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer the Day of Atonement religious ceremonies follow immediately. The Day of Atonement religious observances are the highest holy days of the "Jews" and are celebrated as such throughout the world. The official translation into English of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer is as follows:

"ALL VOWS, OBLIGATIONS, OATHS, ANATHEMAS, whether called 'konam,' 'konas,' or by any other name, WHICH WE MAY VOW, OR SWEAR, OR PLEDGE, OR WHEREBY WE MAY BE BOUND, FROM THIS DAY OF ATONEMENT UNTO THE NEXT, (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. MAY THEY BE DEEMED ABSOLVED, FORGIVEN, ANNULLED, AND VOID AND MADE OF NO EFFECT; THEY SHALL NOT BIND US NOR HAVE POWER OVER US. THE VOWS SHALL NOT BE RECKONED VOWS; THE OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBLIGATORY; NOR THE OATHS BE OATHS."

The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer are referred to in the Talmud in the Book of Nedarim, 23a‑23b as follows:

"And he who desires that NONE OF HIS VOWS MADE DURING THE YEAR SHALL BE VALID, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, EVERY VOW WHICH I MAKE IN THE FUTURE SHALL BE NULL (1). (his vows are then invalid) providing that he remembers this at the time of the vow." (Emphasis in original) A footnote (1) relates: "(1)...THE LAW OF REVOCATION IN ADVANCE WAS NOT MADE PUBLIC." (Emphasis in original text)

The greatest study of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer was made by Theodor Reik, a pupil of the [I]nfamous Jewish Dr. Sigmund Freud. The analysis of the historic, religious and psychological background of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer by Professor Reik presents the Talmud in its true perspective.

This study is contained in "The Ritual, Psycho‑Analytical Studies." In the chapter on the Talmud, page 163, he states:

"THE TEXT WAS TO THE EFFECT THAT ALL OATHS WHICH BELIEVERS TAKE BETWEEN ONE DAY OF ATONEMENT AND THE NEXT DAY OF ATONEMENT ARE DECLARED INVALID."

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer has no spiritual value as might be believed because it is recited in synagogues on the Day of Atonement as the prologue of the religious ceremonies which follow it.

The SECULAR significance of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer is forcefully indicated by the analysis in Vol. VI, page 441:

"The Kol Nidre HAS NOTHING WHATEVER TO DO WITH THE ACTUAL IDEA OF THE DAY OF ATONEMENT...it attained to extraordinary solemnity and popularity by reason of the fact that it was THE FIRST PRAYER RECITED ON THIS HOLIEST OF DAYS."

Being amazed at this revelation on about the Kol Nidre, I happened to notice in the index the "Star of David." So I decided to look it up and see what the Jewish Encyclopedia had to say about it and found the following.

������������� THE "SACRED" STAR OF DAVID

Non‑Jews have been drenched with propaganda that the six‑ pointed "Star of David" is a sacred symbol of Jewry, dating from David and Solomon, in Biblical times, and signifying the pure "monotheism" of the Jewish religion. In actuality, the six‑ pointed star, called "David's Shield," or "Magen David," was only adopted as a Jewish device in 1873, by the American Jewish Publication Society, it is not even mentioned in rabbinical literature.

MAGEN DAWID ("DAVID'S SHIELD"):

���� "The hexagram formed by the combination of two equilateral triangles; used as the symbol of Judaism. It is placed upon synagogues, sacred vessels, and the like, and was adopted as a device by the American Publication Society in 1873, the Zionist Congress of Basel, hence by 'Die Welt (Vienna), the official organ of Zionism, and by other bodies. The hebra kaddisha of the Jewish community of Johannesburg, South Africa, calls itself 'Hebra Kaddisha zum Rothn Magen David,' following the designation of the 'red cross' societies...IT IS NOTEWORTHY, MOREOVER, THAT THE SHIELD OF DAVID IS NOT MENTIONED IN RABBINICAL LITERATURE.

���� The 'Magen Dawid,' therefore, probably did not originate within Rabbinism, the official and dominant Judaism for more than 2,000 years. Nevertheless a David's shield has recently been noted on a Jewish tombstone at Tarentum, in southern Italy, which may date as early as the third century of the common era. The earliest Jewish literary source which mentions it, the 'Eshkol ha‑Kofer' of the karaite Judah Hadassi (middle of the 12th cent.) says, inch. 242: 'Seven names of angels precede the mezuzah: Michael, Garield, etc... Tetragrammation protect thee! And likewise the sign called 'David's shield' is placed besides the name of each angel.' It was therefore, at this time a sign on amulets. In the magic papyri of antiquity, pentagrams, together with stars and other signs, are frequently found on amulets bearing the Jewish names of God, 'Sabaoth,' 'Adonai,' 'Eloai,' and used to guard against fever and other diseases. Curiously enough, only the pentacle appears, not the hexagram. In the great magic papyrus at Paris and London there are twenty‑two signs sided by side, and a circle with twelve signs, but NEITHER A PENTACLE NOR A HEXAGRAM, although there is a triangle, perhaps in place of the latter.

���� In the many illustrations of amulets given by Budge in his 'Egyptian Magic' (London, 1899) NOT A SINGLE PENTACLE OR HEXAGRAM APPEARS. THE SYNCRETISM OF HELLENISTIC, JEWISH, AND COPTIC INFLUENCES DID NOT THEREFORE, ORIGINATE THE SYMBOL. IT IS PROBABLE THAT IT WAS THE CABALA THAT DERIVED THE SYMBOL FROM THE TEMPLARS. THE CABALA, IN FACT, MAKES USE OF THIS SIGN, ARRANGING THE TEN SEFIROT, or spheres, in it, and placing in on AMULETS. The pentagram, called Solomon's seal, is also used as a talisman, and HENRY THINKS THAT THE HINDUS DERIVED IT FROM THE SEMITES ^[110], although the name by no means proves the Jewish or Semitic origin of the sign. The Hindus likewise employed the hexagram as a means of protection, and as such it is mentioned in the earliest source, quoted above. In the synagogues, perhaps, it took the place of the mezuzah, and the name 'SHIELD OF DAVID' MAY HAVE BEEN GIVEN IT IN VIRTUE OF ITS PROTECTIVE POWERS. The hexagram may have been employed originally also as an architectural ornament on synagogues, as it is, for example, on the cathedrals of Brandenburg and Stendal, and on the Marktkirche at Hanover.

���� A pentacle in this form, (a five pointed star is shown here), is found on the ancient synagogue at Tell Hum. Charles IV, prescribed for the Jews of Prague, in 1354, A RED FLAG WITH BOTH DAVID'S SHIELD AND SOLOMON'S SEAL, WHILE THE RED FLAG WITH WHICH THE JEWS MET KING MATTHIAS OF HUNGARY in the fifteenth century showed two pentacles with two golden stars. The pentacle, therefore, may also have been used among the Jews. It occurs in a manuscript as early as the year 1073. However, the six‑pointed star has been used for centuries for magic amulets and cabalistic sorcery." ^[111]

Since Jerusalem was destroyed in A.D. 70, the Jews have continued to absorb proselytes from all races. The ancient monuments presenting a physiognomy characteristic of the Hittites reveals the total eradication of Israelitish features.

History proves that neither literally or spiritually can the modern Jew claim to be Abraham's descendants, and their claim to the Holy Land is therefore without foundation.

The Pharisees and the Sadducees were Jews as we know. John recognized them for what they were when he said in Matthew 3:7:

"Oh generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?"

Our Lord enlarges on this when He excoriates the Jews in the 23rd chapter of Matthew and calls them hypocrites;

"Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" ^[112]

Here we find Christ confirming John's description of these people. In John 8:44 Jesus describes the Jews in these words,

"Ye [Jews] are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own for he is a liar and the father of it."

This statement rules out any attempt to establish brotherhood or unity between Christians and Jews as there cannot be "brotherhood" where there are different fathers. Christians have God as their father and Jesus Himself says the Jews have Satan as their father.

We are told in 2 John 7, 9, 11:

"For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and antichrist...Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed; for he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds."

Note this text well. It refers to the Jews who reject Christ. If we so much as wish them good luck, we are as bad as they are in the sight of God.

In Galatians 2:4 we are told,

"And because of false brethren brought in unawares, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage..."

Jude 1:4, 8 tells us:

"For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ...Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities."

Someone, at this point, will always ask, "Doesn't the Bible say we are to love our enemies?" Yes, it does. We must be careful, however, NOT TO LOVE GOD'S ENEMIES, for God will not hold us guiltless if we do. 2 Chronicles 19:2,

"Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love THEM THAT HATE THE LORD? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the Lord."

Being mindful of the fact that Jesus informs us in John 8:44 that these people are the progeny of Satan, it is amazing how some so-called Christians go out of their way to cultivate their good will. We are told in Acts 13:6,9,

"And when they had gone through the Isle of Pathos, they found a certain sorcerer, a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Bar-Jesus...Then Saul, filled with the Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him, and said, 'O, full of all subtility and all mischief, THOU CHILD OF THE DEVIL, THOU ENEMY OF ALL RIGHTEOUSNESS, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?'"

Here Saul (Paul) identifies the Jew as a child of the devil and an enemy of all righteousness.

We can further identify them as "princes of the world" in John 14:30, "...for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me." John 16: 11, "...the prince of the world is judged." John 12:31, "Now is the judgment of this world, now shall the prince of this world be cast out." These texts refer to Satan as the Prince of this world and both Jesus and Paul refer to the Jews as children of the devil, therefore they are princes in Satan's realm. The Jews, because of their hatred for Christ, made it difficult and dangerous for Him to carry on His work in Judea. John 11:7-8,

"Then after that, saith He to His disciples, Let us go into Judea again. His disciples say unto Him, Master, the Jews of late sought to stone thee and goest thou thither again?"

In Luke 4:43-44, Jesus said, "I must preach the Kingdom of God to other cities also for therefore am I sent. And He preached in the synagogues of Galilee."

In John 6:70-71; 7:1 we find these words,

"Jesus answered them, Have I not chosen you twelve and one of you is a devil? He spake of Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon, for it was he that should betray Him, being one of the twelve. After these things Jesus walked in Galilee, for He would not walk in Jewry because the Jews sought to kill Him."

The only Judean Jew among Christ's disciples was Judas. The rest were Galileans. Judas came from a small town in Judea called Kerioth, and he was known as Ishkerioth or Iscariot meaning "man of Kerioth." It is plain that His disciples did not consider themselves Jews of the type found in Judea or they would not have remonstrated with Him against going again to Judea because of fear that the Jews would stone Him.

Indeed, the Jews themselves knew that Peter was not a Jew but a Galilean because of his accent for they said in Matthew 26:73,

"surely thou art also one of them for thy speech betrayeth thee."

Also mark 14:70,

"surely thou art one of them for thou art a Galilean and thy speech agreeth thereto."

It is clear that the Benjamites or Galileans were the ones who accepted Jesus and became Christians while the badly mongrelized people who called themselves Jews who resided for the most part in Judea, refused to accept Him.

Let us now take up the astounding admission by the Jews themselves that they are not of the chosen seed, or the "children of promise," which line descended from Abraham through Isaac and Jacob.

"They {Jews} answered Him, We be Abraham's seed and were never in bondage to any man, how sayest thou that we shall be made free?" ^[113]

Here they plainly state they were never in bondage. God's elect, His Chosen People, WERE IN BONDAGE IN EGYPT. The House of Israel, or the ten tribes comprising the Northern Kingdom, were in bondage to Assyria and the House of Judah was in Bondage to Babylon, yet these Jews say they were never in bondage to any man!

Jesus replied to their claim that they were of the seed of Abraham in the 37th verse which says,

"I know that ye {say ye} are Abraham's seed but ye seek to KILL ME because my word hath no place in you."

This presents us with a dilemma. If these people were of the seed of Abraham as Jesus says, how does it happen that they were not in bondage in Egypt with all of the Israelites? The solution to this apparent contradiction is found in the 39th verse,

"If YE {Jews} WERE Abraham's CHILDREN, ye would do the works of Abraham."

Here we have a distinction between the children of Abraham and the seed of Abraham. If the Jews had been of the chosen line and the "children of promise," they would have descended from Jacob Israel and would have been in bondage in Egypt, but since they deny they were ever in bondage, their descent must necessarily have been through Jacob's brother, Esau, whose descendants were NEVER IN BONDAGE.

Genesis 36:8-9,

"thus dwelt Esau in Mount Seir: Esau is Edom and these are the generations of Esau, the father of the Edomites, in Mt. Seir."

The name of the Edomites at the time of Christ was IDUMEANS. About 125 years before the time of Christ, war broke out between the Judahites of Judea and the nation of the Idumeans.

The Judahites under Hyracanus triumphed over the Edomites, as a condition of peace, they demanded that the Edomites or Idumeans must be circumcised and accept the religion of Israel, or face annihilation.

The Edomites accepted the terms and were absorbed into the nation of Judea. In time they completely dominated their erstwhile conquerors so that by the time of Christ, traces of the descendants of the House of Judah had all but vanished.

In Romans 9:13 it says,

"As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated."

Romans 9:7-8 clarifies the matter a little more,

"Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, in Isaac shall thy seed be called."

That is, they which are the children of the flesh (Esau), these are not the children of God: but the children of promise (Isaac) are counted for the seed.

The children of the promise are of the righteous line extending from Adam through Isaac and Jacob, while the children of the flesh are those of the Satanic line who trace their ancestry from Cain.

David asked that the Lord blot the Jews out of the Book of the Living. Psalm 69:21, 24, 27-28:

"They gave me also gall for my meat and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink. Pour out thy indignation upon them and let thy wrathful anger take hold of them. Let them be blotted out of the Book of the Living and NOT be written with the righteous."

We would do well to follow David's example when he says in Psalm 139:21-22,

"Do I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? Am I not grieved with those that rise against thee? I HATE THEM WITH A PERFECT HATRED, I COUNT THEM MY ENEMIES."

There are some who will say that it was not the Jews who killed Jesus, but the Romans. Paul pins the crime squarely on the Jews when but Peter, John, Luke and Paul pins it squarely on their shoulders ^[114]; John 19:14-18; Acts 2:36; 4:3-10; 5:30; 10:39; 13:27-29; and 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15.

It is true the Romans soldiers cast lots for His garments, but of those, Jesus said in Luke 23:34, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do." Here Christ was speaking of "the children of the promise" the SEED of Abraham because they had been deceived by the Jews into helping them; for the Jews well knew what they were doing, for they said to Pilate,

"Let His blood be upon us and on our children."

There is no record in all of the Scriptures where Jesus ever forgave the Jews. Because of their very nature, it is difficult to see how they can be included in God's great plan of redemption.

Someone says this is not true, and they will quote John 12:32 in support of their position.

"And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me."

Does this mean that Jews will be drawn to Jesus at some future date? The answer is found in 1 Thessalonians 2:15, where Paul says,

"Who hath killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please NOT God, and are CONTRARY to all men (Adamites)."

The Jews, then, being contrary to ALL MEN (Adamites) are not apparently classed as men (Adamites) but are evil spirits in human form which cannot be drawn to Jesus.

Our Lord spoke in parables solely for the purpose of keeping the truth from them. It was not part of His plan that they should understand and be converted. ^[115] e find this record in the following text, Matthew 13:10-11,

"And the disciples came and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you (Adamites) to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven, but to them (Canaanites - Jews) it is not given."

Mark 4:11-12,

"And He said unto them (Adamites), Unto you (Adamites) it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God but to them (Canaanites) without, all these things are done in parables that seeing they may see and not perceive and hearing they may hear and not understand LEST AT ANY TIME THEY SHOULD BE CONVERTED AND THEIR SINS SHOULD ^[116]. BE FORGIVEN THEM." ^[117]

Other authors have estimated that the "mixed multitude" Adamites who had lost their first estate by mixing with the Canaanites (Cainites) and were in Palestine at the time of Christ totalled no more than 20,000 out of the entire population.

The number of all the Jews, descendants of the mating of Lucifer with Eve and his descendants mating with pre-Adamites and later Adamites, could not have been more than a few hundred thousand at the time of Christ.

According to the Jews in their own Talmudic and Zohar writings these bodiless fallen Angels roam the earth without bodies until those of them who have mated with pre-Adamites or Adamites (mixed seed of fallen Angeles and others) until those of their kind with physical bodies produce offspring into which their evil spirits can enter into and reside within.

To these "vampires" who still had enough of the spirit of God in them so they could still understand what Jesus had to say, this presented a unique opportunity. Christ was preaching to the "Lost Sheep of the House of Israel" or Adamites who had lost their psychic abilities when they were transferred from their first birthplace in "heaven" into the Earth or were "born again" of water (woman) into physical forms here as part of the Adamic race.

The message of Christ was to� these "Lost" Adamites to restore their lost memory of what they had been and what they had been taught before being transferred her onto the earth (terrestrial plane) from "heaven" or the (celestial plane).

If the Canaanites who still had some of the genes of Eve (Adamic) in them still functioning could understand even part of the message of Christ which was NOT meant for them but for the Adamic race, they could feign being the true Adamites and even though they would be rejected by the early Church they could use their ill gotten knowledge to the point where they could use their "conversion" to become familiar with Adamic men and women wherein they could seduce their minds or bodies or both.

Their mating with the unsuspecting Adamites would give them even more receptacles into which their Satanic spirits could be injected into and therefore they would produce new "Jews" (Cainites) to work towards the day when all 133,000,000 of them would inhabit physical bodies which would then be the time when their leader the antichrist (Lucifer) would again appear to lead them and their cohorts (pre-Adamites and Adamites who were mentally seduced and were made into "Jews of the spirit" their bodies were under the control of evil spirits.

In 1955 the late Major General George Van Horn Moseley wrote an open letter to the New York Times stating that he believed that there were not 6-million Jews in the United States at that time, but approximately 30-million. He said that he had studied the Talmud and other Jewish writings and was aware of the fact that the World Almanac in reporting the number of "Jews" who participate in Satanic services at those synagogues or are registered contributors and members.

He noted that according to Jewish religious practices Jews who are under 13 and have not received their Bar Mitzvah are not counted, non-religious Jews are not counted and the Jews do not consider women to be equal and "human" and thus female Jewesses are also not counted in the figures.

Of course, those who have "Jewish" genes but mixed with other races or attend churches of other religions are also not counted in the official World Almanac totals. Thus, the number of Jews in any given country can be conservatively figured at four times the official number reported by the World Almanac.

How many half Jews, quarter Jews, eighth Jews, etc., are possessed by Satanic (evil spirits) and are carrying out the Luciferian program whether they realize it or not?

How many non-Jews by race have been conditioned by "Christian" televangelists and their local "Judeo-Christian" ministers and priests to view the Luciferian Jews as "God's Chosen People" and have more love and loyalty in their hearts for the Jews than they do for those of their own Adamic race? How many of those "Christians" have been conditioned to the point where the Satanic spirits of the Jews have been able to enter into their bodies and take control of their lives?

The World Almanac has put the number of Jews in the world at around 17-million for the past 50 years and Jewish publications keep complaining that the numbers of Jews in the world is decreasing not increasing. What these Jewish leaders are talking about is that the number of Jews who attend the synagogues and observe every Jewish ritual are decreasing but in reality Jews who are Jews by race but don't participate in any synagogue but carry on either knowingly or unknowingly the war of Lucifer against Christ.

����������������������������������� Chapter Five

������������ A NEW GENERATION OF VIPERS

"The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?" ^[118]

Ruling class conspiracy research has long neglected one key facet, and therefore the overarching theme - indeed, the very raison d'etre of the principals - has been missed. Economic and political maneuvers are secondary considerations to the ultimate scenario.

A spiritual dimension underlies ruling class aspirations for world supremacy without exception. First and foremost, Masonry ^[119], Judaism ^[120], and the Roman Catholic Church are all religions. Each uses the same book - the Bible, or parts thereof - to create an aura of legitimacy for their designs upon the hearts men.

While Masonic, Romish, and Jewish scholars labor unceasingly to discredit the Bible in the minds of the masses, they all stake their claims to the Kingdom of God (and their own anticipated thrones) upon the Scriptures. Using end-time Bible prophecies to substantiate their own doctrines, they loudly condemn others for doing the same.

This is not to say that the Bible agrees with interpretations emanating from these false theologians. Although each lays claim to the Kingdom, it is only by textual malfeasance on their part and scriptural illiteracy on the part of their followers that has permitted this folly to continue.

And continue it has, to the point that soon we shall all be caught in the swirling vortex of their voracious ambitions, supported by manipulated Scriptures and a tragically misguided flock. Collusion between these former opponents has brought to birth the Beast, and they now move forth with one voice, toward a common goal - to impose upon us in their own "Kingdom of God."

Let it be clear from the outset that we are not facing a benevolent journey into the Promised Land, but instead a forced march into cruel bondage. Irrespective of the scenarios playing out for our benefit on the world stage, all of the real action is happening in the religious sphere where Rome now enjoys the full support of her erstwhile opponents. Impossible you say? Let us weight the evidence. "Behold, ye trust in lying words, that cannot profit." ^[121]

The attack upon the West is the battle for its soul. Our religious foundations are crumbling, and upon that basis the West will be destroyed. This has been done with the conscious

cooperation of the Judeo-Christian religions. The greatest enemy of the West is her own corrupted religious leadership. Their utter misrepresentation of the God of the Bible (undeniably the God of the West) pinpoints the spiritual nature of the battle. This betrayal by religious leaders will inevitably rob the West of her pre-eminent global position, and reduce her station to one more in keeping with the desired New Order.

But the decline of Western Civilization an only be fully discerned by perceiving the ongoing manipulation of man's spiritual desires. Conspiracy theories are useless without the knowledge of history (where this scenario has been played out before), without the knowledge of religions (which fleshes out their true nature hidden in secret doctrines and coded symbols), and without knowledge of the Scriptures (for without understanding of the sacred, no sense can be made of the profane).

In particular, four false theologies are bearing fruit of a most malevolent variety; liberation theology, ecumenical-interfaith theology, the theology of death, and (for want of a better term) dirty-sex theology. Once these are understood, the ultimate conspiracy scenario comes sharply into focus.

"Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee." ^[122]

Liberation theology is theology straight from hell: the intentional seeding of world revolution. It is also the official social teaching of Roman Catholicism, which sees itself as the Kingdom of God on earth. "Liberation" is the means of destroying that which stands in the way of Rome's Kingdom, that is, secular governments.

In the U.S., the National Council of Churches (NCC) is the official Protestant spearhead for liberation theologians.

"The real goal of all religion is political and economic liberation from the bondage of Western capitalism, imperialism, colonialism, racism, sexism, and classism." ^[123]

In league with Judaism and Roman Catholicism, the NCC is fighting for "social justice," and creating an ecumenical-interfaith octopus whose influence is well-nigh all-encompassing. But the NCC's reach exceeds its grasp, and it is now seeking

"a stronger role of churches in guiding the nation's international affairs." ^[124]

To foster the austere lifestyle planned for the manmade "Kingdom of God," the Western consciousness is receiving a drubbing of a distinctly Catholic bent, and suffering massive doses of guilt for having received the blessing promised by and inherited from the God of the West.

Both churches and schools are major conduits for re-education of the masses. ^[125] Capitalism is no longer an extension of the Protestant work ethic, but instead a dragon that must be slain. Ruling class corporations are not the real target; it is the middle class who will largely take the hit.

This religious attack upon capitalism is a classic work of deception when one considers the Vatican's heavy corporate presence in the West, that Vatican real estate holdings exceed most, if not all others, and the hypocrisy of anti-capitalist rhetoric coming from a man living in unparalleled wealth amidst the unseemly opulence and gaudy splendor of Vatican City - a clear-cut case of "conspicuous consumption" if ever there was one!

The Church continuously assails the faithful for the "greed" of the West, but conveniently ignores the fact that Western taxpayers are already footing a bill of untold billions for every manner of aid to foreign lands, supporting the world, generously sustaining a growing immigrant population, propping up failing regimes, heavily subsidizing emerging democracies and underwriting the manifold global efforts of the U.N. as well as the total support of the Murderous Zionist State of Israel.

But the Church (as ecumenically understood; Rome and her ilk) well understands the spiritual longings of humanity, and finds success where Marxism previously failed.

"The Church reaches deep into the innermost part of man."

The inability to "marxise" the inner man left a void that socialism could not fill. In order to liberate the middle-class West from its prosperous lifestyle, the Christian message has been twisted beyond recognition to serve the interests of the one-worlders. ^[126]

Thus, under a mask of human rights and dignity, the Church is subtly weaving ideas of class warfare and rebellion into the fabric of society. Even the Denver World Youth Day's official litany was spiked, invoking a God unfamiliar to most Americans:

"Justice Seeker...Parent of the Poor...God of Struggle...Justice Seeker...Liberating and Loving Friend...God of Our Struggle... Liberating Friend...Liberator...God of Justice...Seeker of Justice and Joy."

Queerly out of sync with its youthful, privileged audience, this litany was clearly a brainwashing exercise. The mass-consciousness, by repetitious use of liberation buzzwords, is being seeded for revolution. ^[127]

And what of the poor? Instead of dignity, liberation theology instills a debilitating morbidity and a mindset of implacable discontent. Liberation messages corrupt the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Luke 3:14 gave the precise command to,

"...Do violence to no man, neither accuse any falsely; and be content with your wages,"

not to mention the call to personal (not collective) holiness found throughout the New Testament. This same gospel applies to both rich and poor. The rich Christian is exhorted to voluntarily minister to the poor out of his abundance, but the Bible was never meant to be used as the wealth-equalization plan envisioned by liberation theologians.

Correctly understood, a personal relationship with God exists for each person individually, and consists of two elements - responsibility towards god for one's own behavior, and utter dependence upon Him for one's own needs. But this kind of teaching is dangerous. The widespread practice of such reliance upon God as truly Lord of one's life would render much of what passes as religious ministry entirely useless; taken to its fullest extent, the Church would be powerless.

By perpetuating the illusion that one is responsible to the Church, and that by the Church one subsists, a continuous and artificial dependency upon the Church is established where none is necessary.

The Church must usurp the relationship between God and man to maintain its worldly economic power and political control. Therefore it is the Church that needs the poor, not vice versa.

Rome's recently issued catechism,

"justifies armed resistance to repression by political powers if the oppression is severe and prolonged."

Armed Resistance! This catechism (specifically a teaching document to be spread tot he remotest areas of the world) sanctifies bloody violence, while pretending to speak as God Almighty.

But for whose sake?

"For the poore he pleads, but himselfe is the poore he means well to."

The Church's "prefential option for the poor" and "apologies" to native groups are transparent ploys proffered to gain the confidence of the alienated.

Sustained by a rage born of self-pity, the malleable underclass can be summoned in opposition to western governments when the time is right. ^[128]

The Roman Catholic New Jerome Bible Commentary states,

"Satan is the personification of all disorder, dissension and scandal in the community."

Thus the Church is hoisted upon her own petard: found engaging in Satanism by her own definition. Disorder, dissension and scandal in the community? One would be hard-pressed to find a more fitting description of liberation theology.

"O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." ^[129]

From antiquity, as early as Babylon, ruling class control over the masses has been accomplished by carefully and cleverly devised myths.

In this way, elitist power was exerted over all spheres of everyday life. Throughout history, only one serious threat to this control has existed - the knowledge and dissemination of truth. Yet the ruling class formula's efficacy is evident in that it continues quite successfully even to this day, and remains basically unchanged.

The foundation of today's ruling lass myth is the second of four malevolent theologies under consideration: the cloying and brainless ecumenical-interfaith theology (prima facie evidence of the generation's inexcusable doltishness).

The myth itself emanated from and was maintained exclusively by manipulations of religious belief. The Babylonian priesthood regularly tinkered with religious belief in order to create the oneness necessary for complete control. When Babylon dominated Mesopotamia, the priesthood worked to shore up its own power by incorporating the various local deities in "a process of syncretism and ecumenical fervor."

As historian Michael Grant notes of a later culture using the same technique,

"It was in vain that the Epicureans attacked this conception of religion and mythology as an improper means of bolstering the power of priests and rulers. The priests and rulers, and the imaginative writers who were their friends, knew just what they were doing."

This syncretism occurs over and over throughout history. The cult of Serapis was created by Ptolemy Soter who used it,

"in an attempt to blend the existing Egyptian concepts with those of the Greeks who settled in Egypt after the conquest of Alexander the Great."

In combining the old Greek worship of Hades with the Egyptian religion, Ptolemy attempted to undermine his conquerors by capturing the souls of Greeks established in Egypt. Religious belief transcends even patriotism.

"In his Laws, Plato advocates a cult of Apollo and Helios, so as to combine ancient ritual and rational thought."

Neo-Platonic and Neo-Pythagorean authors proclaimed the unity of all mysteries. The Caesars embraced their interpretation Romans, laying claim to all foreign gods worshipped in the Empire, and exporting emperor-worship to the provinces. Constantine attempted to combine the worship of Appolo (god of the Caesars) with the worship of Christ.

Philo syncretized Greek philosophy with Judaism and medieval Jews worked to harmonize Greco-Arabic philosophy with Kabbalah. Origen tried to synthesize Stoicism and Neoplatonic philosophy with Christianity.

Augustine sought to lump the Mithraic Mystery cult with the Christians. The patriarchs of Roman Catholicism (Justin Martyr, Origen, Clement, Augustine, etc.) mixed Platonism with Christianity; later, Aquinas endeavored to reconcile Aristotle's philosophy with Augustine's platonic brew.

None of these religious hybrids elevated man spiritually, but rather served ruling class regimes (and hopefuls) ever seeking to consolidate their power through spiritual control. Recently, John Paul II congratulated Voodoo priests for their "faith in the one and good God." Is this a small matter difference? ^[130]

The pontiff calls Muslims "brothers and sisters in faith in our God," and even Billy Graham's evangelical Christianity Today has christened the Muslims "estranged half-brothers and sisters." Graham also in his fear-mongering, environmentalist propaganda book, "Earth in the Balance," Vice President Al Gore writes, "Nature, in its fullest, is God." But how many know that the theology of world-acclaimed evangelist Billy Graham fits in well with that of Al Gore, a fellow Southern Baptist?

In "McCall's Magazine" (January 1978), Billy Graham told an interviewer that his views on salvation had changed.

"I used to believe that pagans in far-off countries were lost; were going to hell," said Graham. "I no longer believe that. I believe that there are 'other ways' of recognizing the existence of God, 'through nature,' for instance."

Thus, New Agers who preach nature worship and who exalt Gala, the planetary deity, will find great comfort in these words from Billy Graham.

Jews Don't Need Jesus, Either: And there's more. According to Graham, heaven not only awaits earth worshippers but also Christ-rejecting Jews. The popular celebrity told "McCall's" that Jews who reject Jesus may, nevertheless, still go to heaven. (What an unmitigated liar Billy Graham, who by the way is himself Jewish. His real name is "Frank.")

Graham a Catholic?: "What about Catholics?," the "McCall's" interviewer asked. Yes, said Graham, sincere Catholics will also be saved. Indeed, Billy Graham revealed that his own beliefs "are essentially the same as those of Orthodox Roman Catholics."

The evangelist even stated that he would soon go to Rome and preach at a Catholic cathedral. He had been invited to Rome, he revealed, by a top Vatican official.

A Man Loved By the World: Amazingly, these facts, from Billy Graham's own mouth, were revealed almost 20 years ago in "McCall's," a popular women's magazine read by millions and sold in supermarkets and convenience stores everywhere.

Billy Graham's adoption and promotion of these satanically-inspired philosophies explains why a decadent and admiring, yet unsaved and sinful, populace holds the Baptist evangelist in such high esteem.

If he were to preach the hard truth, like Jeremiah, Elijah, and John the Baptist did, the evangelist would surely be hated and ostracized by the world. But because he speaks the lukewarm, politically correct, unity-in-diversity, Judeo-Christian language of modern "Mystery Babylon," Billy Graham consistently ranks among "America's Ten Most Admired Men" in opinion polls.

One sure sign of a false prophet is that he is praised by the world. Billy Graham is a man who proudly trumpets his friendship with presidents and prime ministers. He has said, "I no longer believe in a literal hell." He refrains from saying clearly that homosexuality is wickedness. Graham has also stated that he does not complain about abortion because, "No one really knows when life begins."

All this has made him a friend of the world ^[131], a man respected and touted even by the liberal media. How stark a contrast with our Lord Jesus Christ who, the Bible records, "made himself of no reputation."

It would be wise for Billy Graham and his legions of supporters to carefully consider these powerful words of the Apostle James:

"Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." ^[132]

Obviously, Billy Graham's teaching that men can be saved through nature or by false religion cannot be squared with Scripture.

The Bible tells us that "only" through faith in Jesus Christ and His finished work on the stake can men and women be saved. Not through trees, rocks, and babbling brooks, and not by church traditions as taught by the Pope of Rome and his Catholic minions:

"For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus." ^[133]

It cannot be overemphasized that Billy Graham's public statements over the years have already caused many of God's Israel people in untold numbers to be separated from their God.

Millions of people believe the false teachings of Graham; many place utmost confidence in his every word. If Billy Graham tells them they need not be born again ^[134] through faith in Jesus Christ to enter into His Kingdom, they believe him rather than God's word. However, trusting man instead of God, they will ultimately perish.

Billy Graham is not alone in his guilt. Isn't it strange and more than a little curious that leaders of the Christian establishment have consistently refused to expose or even to mildly criticize Billy Graham's unscriptural satanic inspired views?

Why haven't the editors at "Christianity Today, Moody's," and "Charisma Magazines" and the hundreds of owners and managers of the 1,500 Christian radio stations affiliated with the "National religious Broadcasters," spoken out in protest against Billy Graham's heretical statements?

What about the leaders of such powerful denominations as the Southern Baptist Convention, the Assemblies of God, the Lutheran Church, and the Church of God? and the other Christian Churches, so-called, spoken out? Why this massive conspiracy of silence?

The answer is found in the Scriptures. There we are told that just before the return of Christ, the knowledge of the truth will be in short supply. Men will love the pleasures of this world and the applause of men more than they love God. Thus,

"...evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived." ^[135]

Billy Graham has told columnist Cal Thomas that saving babies by fighting abortion is not "a big thing" to him ^[136]. But, says the famed evangelist, he "is" concerned about saving Mother Earth. To him, that's a big thin.

Indeed, Graham is so upset about the environmental harm being done to planet Earth that he recently vowed to begin actively speaking out on this issue.

Graham has long maintained that the pro-life movement is irrelevant since "No one really knows when life begins" ^[137]. Again and again, he has refused to become involved in speaking out against abortion. "It's not an issue I wish to pursue," Graham arrogantly informed CNN talk show host Larry King in 1993. "I try to stay away from these things that are so emotional," Graham told the "Philadelphia Inquirer Newspaper," in 1992.

Neither is homosexuality a hot button for Billy Graham. "It's not a big sin," the evangelist recently told startled reporters at a national press conference. On the "Larry King Show" (December 1994), Graham justified this by explaining that homosexuals and lesbians are just "born that way."

But apparently, while the popular North Carolina Baptist Evangelist doesn't want to expend his energies battling abortion, homosexuality, pornography, New Ageism and Humanism in public schools, the New World Order, and other rampant evils, he does not feel the same way about environmentalism.

Interviewed recently on Cal Thomas' television program on Cable TV's CNBC Network, Graham insisted that protecting the environment is more important than protecting the unborn. Here's the exchange between Billy Graham and Cal Thomas ^[138]:

"Mr. Thomas: 'You've been reluctant to speak out on the top social issue of our time, abortion. Why?'" "Mr. Graham. 'I think the top social issue of our time may be ecology (the environment). I think that's more dangerous...and I'm going to start speaking out on that.'"

So, to Billy Graham, the murder of 40-million babies through abortion since 1963, in the U.S.A. alone, is not "a big thing" he needs to deal with. Admittedly, Graham is a politically astute liberal.

He well knows that fighting abortion is politically incorrect, and he realizes that, were he to support the saving of unborn babies, the famous evangelist would not make the next published list of "America's Ten Most Admired Men."

Graham, also knows, however, that saving Mother Earth is politically correct. After all, every good liberal wants to save the environment and kill the unborn babies, all at the same time! Graham says that his beliefs "are essentially the same as orthodox Roman Catholics."

Graham has frequently praised Pope John Paul II. During his recent crusade in North Korea, the evangelist even delivered, straight from the pulpit, a personal message to the Korean people from the Pope.

For years Roman Catholic priests and nuns have worked closely with Billy Graham and his top ministry associates. They gladly help to sponsor and promote his evangelistic crusades. In return, many people (thousands) who come forward at invitation time are referred by Graham's altar call team to local Catholic churches and priests.

Since Billy Graham, in his own words, professes to embrace orthodox Roman Catholicism, it is only fair to list just a few of his, and their, beliefs. Here, then, is what Billy Graham believes, by his own admission:

�� 1). Christians may pray to Mary or to any of thousands of��������� dead saints, as well as to Jesus and God the Father.

�� 2). Mary, in heaven, is the Mother of God and appears������������ today to faithful Christians who pray to her and say������������ the rosary.

�� 3). Through infant baptism, babies are regenerated; that����������� is, saved.

�� 4). The Bible is not sufficient in itself as the final�������������������� authority for Christians. Church tradition and official����������� papal teachings are to be accepted as well.

�� 5). Donations and offerings are to be given to Catholic������������� priests so that masses can be conducted for the dead���������� who suffer in purgatory.

�� 6). These rituals, plus prayers and rosaries, are necessary���������� so that deceased relatives and friends who died in sin����������� can be released early from their pain and suffering in���������� purgatory and go on to paradise.

�� 7). The Pope is infallible (inerrant) in his doctrines and������������ teachings. However, the Bible, though inspired, is not���������� inerrant.

�� 8). When greeting the Catholic pope, cardinals, bishops,����������� and other eminences, Christians should kneel before������������ them and kiss their rings.

�� 9). Salvation is not achieved through grace alone. Faith������������ simply begins the process of being save. Ultimately,������������� salvation is dependent on one's continued faith and������������� good works.

�� 10). Jesus is not coming again to set up His millennial��������������� kingdom , and there is no such thing as a coming���������������� rapture of the Bride of Christ.

�� 11). In the Catholic mass, the bread and wine literally��������������� become the flesh and blood of Christ. These elements���������� must be worshipped and adored just as if they are��������������� Jesus' very presence. Only a Catholic priest may touch�������� these elements and then only with one finger and his����������� thumb.

�� 12). Christians can gain special favor with God by�������������������� scourging, ravaging, and torturing their bloodied����������������� bodies with metal-tipped whips and by other painful,����������� self-inflicted suffering.

�� 13). Statues, idols, and images of Mary, Joseph, and����������������� thousands of other dead saints are to be bowed to,�������������� knelt to, and venerated by Christians.

�� 14). Relics of saints, actual bits of the bones, skin, flesh������������� and hair of dead people are to be deposited in the� ������������cornerstone of every Christian church as it is built. In���������� U.S. military chapels, the bit of bone, flesh, or hair is����������� to be sewn into the Greek Antimensium (a white��������������� linen cloth) and placed on the altar during the�������������������� Catholic mass.

Now you know some of the things in which Billy Graham and his Roman Catholic colleagues believe. These teachings, and thousands more, taken as a whole, also constitute what Chuck Colson, Bill Bright, Hank Hanegraaff, James Dobson, Paul Crouch, J.I. Packer, Jack Van Impe, W.A. Criswell, Pat Robertson, and others now say is authentic, true Christianity.

Billy Graham is deceived. That's why he believes that "nature" can save men's souls. That's why he refuses to evangelize lost Jews and Roman Catholics.

That's why he arrogantly stands by idly, silently, while millions of precious babies are slaughtered through abortion.

Regrettably, in his deceit he is bringing thousands of needy and lost souls down with him. May the one true and merciful God cause the uncaring, lukewarm leaders of the Christian establishment who have long covered up and hidden Billy Graham's great apostasy from the true Gospel.

What might God have to say about Graham's pandering to satanic baby-killers? In Psalm 94:16, God implores:

"Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?"

Now comes Billy Graham, one of the most liked and most popular men on Earth, to whine and cry out, "NOT ME, LORD, NOT ME!"

Do you agree with Billy Graham, Jack Van Impe and the others that Catholicism is authentic, true Christianity? Or instead, do you fervently believe, as we do, that this tragic collection of abominations and falsehoods is exactly what God warned about in His Holy Word when He solemnly declared:

"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils." ^[139]

Surely, this is not "the faith once delivered to the saints" ^[140] but instead a pernicious mutation with an evil end. It behooves us, then, to examine elitist structures purveying the controlling myth for our time.

Let us first recognize that all ruling class contestants, the leaders of the Jews ^[141], Masons, and Romanists alike, have been promoting spiritual integration for some time now.

This not only identifies the controlling myth, but confirms that harmony is afoot among the elite (an absolute perquisite for any world government).

Interfaith and ecumenical organizations abound, but one particularly worth noting is the Temple of Understanding, connected to the Cathedral of St. John the Divine (seat of the Episcopal bishop of New York and a recipient of Rockefeller money). With the creation of "a spiritual United Nations" as the Temple's goal, it is a principal prolocuter of today's controlling myth. ^[142]

The Temple of Understanding's founders included Eleanor Roosevelt, Orthodox Patriarch Athenagorus, the Dalai Lama, "Father" Thomas Merton, Jawaharial Nehru, Anwar Sadat, Dr. Albert Schweitzer, former UN Secretary General U-Thant, and Pontiffs John XXIII and Paul VI.

Its current Board of Advisors includes Hans Kung, Robert Muller, Dalai Lama, and Hasidic Rabbi Zalman Schachter. Henry Luce III and Iroquois Chief Oren R. Lyons are on the Board of Directors; Bill Moyers and "Mother" Teressa are among its cheerleaders.

With such notables involved from its inception and with an agenda exclusively devoted to the one world religion ^[143] so essential to their New World Order, the Temple is undeniably a ruling class entity.

This pseudo-religion needs come first, because the controlling myth must initially lay the groundwork by establishing behavioral norms for the governed, and later serve as a bulwark during the World Government's potentially difficult implementation period. ^[144]

The ecumenical-interfaith controlling myth has been upon us for some time now. Malachi Martin similarly identifies J.D. Rockefeller IV, Yehudi Menuhin, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John Foster Dulles, Henry R. Luce, George Meany, Queen Elizabeth II, the Duke of Edinburg, Earl Mountbatten, Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre Trudeau, Robert McNamara, and Cardinal Leo Suenens as past and present "Mega-Religionists."

From this it appears that, apart from minor skirmishes, the struggle for world supremacy was over some time ago. The die was cast much earlier than most conspiracy-watchers realize. ^[145]

The current Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, is an ecumencist. With ecumenical bliss in such abundance, the recent flap about Anglican women pastors is likely a disagreement scripted to dissipate traditional British abhorrence of Catholicism and to tilt conservative believers toward Rome.

The Temple of Understanding was established in 1959. During the sixties, major thrusts such as Vatican II propelled the controlling ideology forward. Today, people are positively giddy with this warm, fuzzy deception and are ripe for the main event.

Lyndon LaRouche is a big booster of ecumenicism; curiously, both LaRouche and the Masonic-Theosophist organization World Goodwill have recently been singing the praises of 15th century Catholic ecumenicist, Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa. ^[146] Any lingering doubts concerning ecumenical-interfaith theology as indoctrination engineered to control mankind are completely dispelled with a speech given by John D. Rockefeller Jr., to the Baptist Social Union in December 1917.

"Would that I had the power to bring to your minds the vision as it unfolds before me! I see all denominational emphasis set aside. I see cooperation, not competition. In the large cities I see great religious centers...In small places, instead of half a dozen dying churches, competing with each other, I see one or two strong churches, uniting the Christian life of the town."

This goes only slightly beyond the standard ecumenical palaver. But then Rockefeller brazenly announced his intended result:

"I see the church molding the thought of the world, as it has never done before, leading in all great movements as it should. I see it literally establishing the Kingdom of God on earth."

Long before ecumenicism was fashionable, Rockefeller had openly identified the design to control the whole world, the brainwashing required to establish the New World Order (a.k.a. "the Kingdom of God"), and the means to do so through the use of religious myth to achieve and sustain control by elites.

Rockefeller pursued his vision. By the early thirties, he had become "the most important financier of literal and ecumenical Protestantism." His money was spread hither and you - into the coffers of famous evangelists (such as Billy Sunday ^[147]) as well as to seminaries like Union Theological Seminary and Jewish Theological Seminary.

Rockefeller set about to gut Christian mission work abroad by perverting the Gospel of Jesus Christ (and substituting instead an agenda corresponding to global goals of the CFR and other internationalist groups), contributing over $1-million to the Inter-church World Movement, and also making substantial donations to the National Council of Churches.

77 years later, today's elitists have neither abandoned nor deviated from this plan, but are vigorously preparing the manmade "Kingdom of God" on the strength of their exceedingly popular religious myth. The Episcopal Cathedral of St. John the Divine is a veritable hotbed of ruling class schemes.

Besides its Temple of Understanding, the Cathedral has spawned other powerful ecumenical-interfaith groups to purvey the controlling myth, such as the Joint Appeal by Religion and Science for the Environment, and the National Religious Partnership for the Environment. Founded in 1992, the Joint Appeal brought together Roman Catholics, Orthodox, Native Americans, Protestants and Jews from 400,000 congregations in order to invade the national consciousness at its most vulnerable level - that is, the soul. Vice President Al Gore is "playing a central role" in the organization.

And in 1993, Vice President Al Gore also established the National Religious Partnership for the Environment - with its offices also located at the Cathedral.

The Partnership is composed of the U.S. Catholic Conference, the National Council of Churches, the Evangelical Environmental Network, and the Consultation of Jewish Life and the Environment - and has received a multimillion-dollar commitment from "The Rockefeller Foundation" and others to fund a major ecumenical/eco-spiritual broadside aimed at churchgoers. Every Roman Catholic Church in America will soon be the object of ruling class largesse. ^[148]

The Temple of Understanding is also closely associated with the Green Cross, an ecumenical/eco-spiritual organization headed by Mikhail Gorbachev.

The Green Cross, aimed at Christian schools and colleges, seeks to supplant traditional studies with "ethical and moral issues relating to ecology."

In addition, Gorbachev (in his Green Cross capacity) will compose the UN Earth Charter, creating an international environmental regulatory code.

Documentation supplied by Leading Edge Research ^[149] describes the Earth Charter as a statement of;

���� "...the principles by which people should conduct themselves in relation to each other and the environment. The Earth Charter will be developed under the auspices of Agenda 21, a far-reaching agreement springing from the Earth Summit of 1992. In other words, 172 nations signed on to a binding agreement (Agenda 21) that had not been wholly written (Earth Charter section) at the time. The wisdom of our wise men has truly perished.

���� Regrettably, the public was greatly deceived about Agenda 21; the media convinced the masses that nothing of substance had been accomplished, when in fact Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on Earth. Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound orientation of all human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced."

The Temple of Understanding also founded the Global Forum of Spiritual and Parliamentary Leaders on Human Survival. Participants at a conference held by the Forum in Oxford during 1988 included Dalai Lama, "Mother" Teresa, Anglican Archbishop Robert Runcie, Carl Sagan, members of the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist Party, the Chief Rabbi of Romania, the Metropolitan of Moscow's Russian Orthodox Church, goddess-worshipping James Lovelock, Forum founder Dean Parks Morton (president of the Temple of Understanding), plus senators, cabinet ministers, and the media.

In a later interview about the conference, Morton said that participants,

"recognized that the much touted separation of church and state is a very recent part of the history of the human family...there is a profound sense in which this separation is very artificial."

Consider the manifold fruits from the Temple of Under-standing's labors. Through the Earth Charter and Agenda 21, the ruling class will overthrow the prosperous lifestyle of the West by means of extremely dubious "environmental reforms."

Through its National Religious Partnership, Joint Appeal, and Green Cross, Christianity is being infiltrated with pagan doctrines as old as Babylon. ^[150] Through its Global Forum, important religious rights are being insidiously subverted. Every significant improvement arising from the Protestant Reformation is being stolen away. We shall all rue the day when Rockefeller's "Kingdom of God" comes to pass.

J.D. Rockefeller's plan rested upon his assurance of the widespread ignorance of Scripture. His scheme would have been seriously hobbled if Christians took responsibility for their own understanding of God's word, instead of relinquishing their brains to the ministers of Church traditions.

The Bible quite plainly states that the shortlived Kingdom of Antichrist comes immediately prior to the Kingdom of the true God. In 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12, Paul writes that the time of Christ - and thus, his Kingdom would follow only after certain events:

"Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition." ^[151]

There can be no mistaking that we are living in the time of "the falling away." This refers specifically to Christianity, the church in apostasy, with Christians departing from their God to follow idolatrous mythology. ^[152]

The man of sin heralds Satan's kingdom on earth. Only after the reign of the Antichristian world government does Jesus Christ return to earth to establish the true Kingdom of God.

While all other religions currently await their messiah, the Christian Scriptures teach that the legitimate Kingdom of God comes only after a time of real terror, when the One World Government (Mystery Babylon) rules the earth.

Because this information does not suit the purposes of empire-building tyrants, and indeed, identifies the very nature of their plan, this part of the Bible has been furiously denied from the days of Eusebius, "that great falsifier of history."

Roman Catholicism and every major denomination of our time, plus many nominal churches, prefer to ignore and deny the Words of the God they pretend to serve. ^[153]

The Church disavows any relevancy of endtime Bible prophecies, thus fostering the Kingdom of Antichrist, "the seat of violence." ^[154]

The ecumenical Church instead subscribes to and supports Rockefeller's Kingdom of a very strange god indeed, the Antichrist.

In August, 1993 when the Parliament for the World's Religions gathered in the name of "brotherhood" and the "unity of all faiths," Rockefeller dollars subsidized the event. ^[155] The 1993 Parliament received the Temple of Understanding's stamp of approval and (of course) worldwide media coverage.

Along with pagans of every stripe, the attendance and approbation of ruling class players gave the Parliament its requisite whiff of respectability and importance.

It has been reported that a number of high-level Masons attended, along with the ubiquitous Dalai Lama, Hans Kung, Louis Farrakhan, Vatican officials including Chicago Cardinal Joseph Bernardin, and assortment of Jewish Rabbis and Muslims, plus the inevitable hodge-podge of theosophists, Hindus, Kabbalists, Native American shamans and goddess-worshipping New Agers.

The Parliament's sheer entertainment value made its motley crew appear less dangerous than they are. Let us not be deceived that this New Age nincompoopery is merely harmless treacle. These minions are the foot-soldiers bringing the controlling myth into fruition on behalf of the elite.

Biblical Christianity are targeted for extinction (because it upholds principles of liberty and freedom). ^[156] During approximately 600 lecutes, demonstrations and presentations, Christianity is presented only as it has been newly invented ("renewed") by the controlling myth. "Toward an Eco-Kosher Judaism?" Or how about "Judaism Beyond God: A New Way of Being Jewish?"

The Parliament's,

"plenaries by politicians and technocrats made it clear that the organizers had a preprogrammed agenda 'to create liberal-humanistic unity' [and] 'facilitators were primed to ensure that nothing...would stop the parliament from realizing its unstated goal.'"

The Temple of Understanding's philosophy clearly dominated the Parliament. Temple of Understanding president Dr. Karan Singh told the Parliament: "...we need not a linear progression in thinking but a paradigm shift in consciousness." Temple of Understanding founder Robert Muller beseeched the Parliament's religions, "You must give humanity the divine for cosmic rules for our behavior on this planet." Without missing a beat, Temple of Understanding board member Hans Kung (who is, coincidentally, a Roman Catholic priest) drew up the Parliament's Declaration of Global Ethics.

Kung came prepared for his starring role. In his book "Global Responsibility: In Search of a New World Ethic," Kung, typically overflowing with elitist anguish expresses fears that survival is quite impossible unless "spheres of differing, contradictory or even conflicting ethics cease to exist." Kung heroically offers a rather unremarkable solution: "This one world needs one ethic... [consisting of] binding norms, values, ideas and goals." Elected government is clearly insufficient for Kung. What we really need are binding norms, values, ideals and goals perpetrated by self-appointed elitists who will decide what is best for us, on a universal basis. Ruling class self-aggrandizement knows no bounds.

The Parliament's Declaration of a Global Ethic echoed Kung's book, calling for "Binding values, irrevocable standards and fundamental moral attitudes," "binding values, convictions, and norma..." "binding values, irrevocable standards and personal attitudes..." and "Irrevocable, unconditional ethical norms..." ^[157]

The so-called "ancient wisdom" of the religious traditions is invoked repeatedly as a standard, an unlikely source of good in the mind of a Christian, or anyone else familiar with the history of religion. But Kung sees truth where others see lies, and in the end, it is the truth that will be sacrificed for The Big Lie - The Controlling Myth. Kung warns that any dissent regarding this religious deception (those troublesome personal attitudes) will receive "the condemnation of humankind."

And what are the binding values, irrevocable standards and personal attitudes of this New Age ruling class bondage? What control will their Myth exert upon us? What manner of yoke do they now approach us with? According to Kung's Declaration of a Global Ethic for the Parliament,

"Every form of egoism should be rejected. All selfishness, whether individual or collective, whether in the form of class thinking, racism, nationalism or sexism." ^[158]

Unmixed collectivism is the bitter fruit of "liberation" theology and ecumenicism, and we shall all soon partake of it if they have their way.

Kung's "noble" goals were presented earlier with a somewhat different spin. A writer in the Cleveland Plain Dealer on April 14, 1991 proclaimed;

"What society needs now...is a noble lie, a myth that deceives us, tricks us, compels us beyond self-interest, beyond ego, beyond family, nation, race, even beyond the self-evident truth that human beings are the crown of reaction. The noble lie will deceive us into placing other people, or the Earth as a whole, above self."

This call is identical to Kung's vision in the Parliament's Declaration, but frankly describes such goals as "a lie." The Global Ethic being foisted upon the world by its religious leaders is, by the above definition, lies and mythology with the sole purpose to deceive us, to trick us.

Kung ignores the ancient wisdom of the Holy Scriptures in the process. He declares that,

"wherever those ruling threaten to repress those ruled, wherever institutions threaten persons, and wherever might oppresses right, we are obligated to resist, whenever possible nonviolently."

Blood shed is evidently anticipated in Kung's Camelot. Here the liberation theology of Rome's Universal Catechism kicks in with the threat of violence to deal with recalcitrant nations preferring to remain aloof from the New Order. The Parliament's Global Ethic puts such governments on notice that they face internal disorder and violence orchestrated by the religious leaders. ^[159]

But in Romans 13:1-2, Paul writes:

"Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation."

Rebellion is not the business of Christians. Kung (who presumably considers himself Christian) not only advocates the destruction of civil governments, but the damnation of souls with this perverse document. Kung calls this declaration;

"a moral foundation for a new global order: and within the Global Ethic cites the UN Declaration of Human Rights. The first item of business in the Parliament's declaration is 'No new global order without a new global ethic!'"

Thus he unmistakably links religion to the UN and provides the basis for the Beast of Revelation: One World Government, One World Religion, all to be ruled by "Mystery Babylon."

Joining Kung in his vision for our future were 250 other "religious leaders" who signed the document.

Chicago Cardinal Joseph Bernardin called it,

"a wonderful framework in which to continue discussions on further issues."

This "wonderful framework" will mark the extinction of our every liberty. Bernardin's smug remark breezily dismisses the constitutional premise of the separation of church and state as if it is a mere passing annoyance.

Is it not astonishing what is being done here, without the consent of the governed, by a group of unelected, self-serving, self-styled "religious leaders?" And they are succeeding for the simple reason that people in the West no longer know their own God: these "religious leaders" are succeeding because they "hold [back] the truth in unrighteousness" ^[160] from the people and substitute, instead, the traditions of men.

Without exaggeration, the Bible is a thoroughly unknown book in our time, to our distinct disadvantage. It's the book they use to justify their own position among us by "handling the word of God deceitfully." ^[161]

Having forfeited our God, who will save the West: The White Man? Indeed, Kung's Statement of Global Ethics for the Parliament of the World's Religions could not even include the word "God" because no agreement could be reached on the meaning, or the propriety, of this term! Although breathtaking in its arrogance, this move betrays their "Kingdom" as, in the last analysis, a "Kingdom" without God. ^[162]

In order to lure evangelical Christians into the fold, Vatican point-man and self-styled "agenda-setter" Chuck Colson received the million-dollar Templeton Prize at the University of Chicago's Rockefeller Chapel in conjunction with the Parliament. ^[163]

Colson is purportedly being groomed to assume Billy Graham's mantle and purveys the controlling myth with as much vigor as Graham, who greatly accelerated the ruling class cause with his scandalous visits to Russia and his papal bootlicking.

The near-deified Graham previously received the Templeton Prize, and like his predecessor Billy Sunday, he is also a past recipient of Rockefeller money. Early on, Graham also gained generous publicity when publishing tycoon William Randolph Hearst wired his newspapers throughout the U.S. to "Puff Graham." ^[164]

During the parliament, a Chicago Sun-Times reporter neatly skewered Colson and his constant call for education in "moral values" (the conservative drum beat for a New Moral Order a la Kung's Global Ethic). Colson, defending the morals imparted to him as a child, could not then adequately explain his subsequent crimes in the Watergate affair.

Another elitist organization worthy of scrutiny is the World Council of Churches (WCC). According to Texe Marrs in Dark Majesty, the president of the WCC's financial affairs is a senior Skull and Bonesman. Perhaps this is why ex-presidents Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan have accepted co-chairmanship of a fund-raising drive for the Ecumenical Development Initiative of the World and National Councils of Churches. The money ($150-million by 2000 A.D.) is being earmarked for the "churches" cooperative efforts in the social and political arena. Former U.S. Presidents stumping for world religion (operating in the social and political arena) again confirms the existence and the nature of the ruling class controlling myth.

Highlights from the WCC Conference on Faith and Order held in August, 1993 hint at the shape of things to come. Top Vatican ecumenicist Cardinal Edward Cassidy reasserted the non-negotiable primacy of the papacy; Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu called for "symbolic and honorary" papal primacy over other Christians; a Nigerian Roman Catholic bishop said that "he discerned a readiness among some churches to acknowledge some sort of papal leadership."

Ecumenical and interfaith overtures mark the path to a New Dark Age of papal Romanism.

"By her relationship with Christ, the Church is a kind of sacrament of intimate union with God, and of the unity of all mankind, that is she is a sign and an instrument of such union and unity."

In The 1993 Directory for Ecumenicism ^[165], Catholic doctrine remains untouched; it is other Christians that must give up their every gain.

This follows the directive of Vatican II:

"[The faithful's] ecumenical activity must not be other than fully and sincerely Catholic." and "Nothing is so foreign to the spirit of ecumenicism as a false conciliatory approach which harms the purity of Catholic doctrine."

Vatican II called for a "full visible communion of all Christians" but it is a unity most decidedly crated in the image of Rome (a fact largely misunderstood by the sleepy-headed Protestants).

Ecumenical agreements made by Protestants with Rome are sometimes cloaked in secrecy. One major accord between Lutheran theologians and Rome underscored the mysterious nature of these agreements:

"the document itself was not made public, nor would participants in the dialogue spell out the specific areas of agreement and disagreement."

Lest anyone minimize the scope of the threat, there is also a Pontifical Council for Dialogue with Non-Believers. The World Religion must be all-inclusive to achieve the total domination desired by the ruling class. So, the New Dark Age will resemble the earlier papal Dark Ages. At the pinnacle of Rome's power, Boniface VIII issued the papal bull Unam Sanctum. ^[166]

"Moreover we declare, affirm, define, and pronounce that it is altogether necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff."

Roman Catholicism has always taught this very dogma; it is the crux of the whole matter. Rome rose to her greatest power under circumstances that parallel our own time:

"No control but that of religion appeared sufficient to restrain the abuses of society..."

Just as today's Vatican frequently offers itself as intermediary and negotiator, Innocent III stepped in as the "general arbiter of differences and conservator of peace." Within a very few years, Innocent began Rome's bloody massacres with the execution of 30,000 Albigenses, a war of extermination with scarcely a parallel in history; until the massacre of more than 20-million Christians by the Jews when they took control of Russia in 1917.

"Rome inspired...all the terror of her ancient name. She was once more mistress of the world, and kings were her vassals."

Under the banner of moral order, Rome's unspeakable cruelty reached new heights.

The very same "moral order" tactic is being foisted upon us today, with ruling class accommodation across-the-board. it is being sold to the conservative middle-class disguised as "traditional family values," and to others as "spiritual renewal," etc.

These are mere variations on a theme; the tune that they are calling us to dance to is one and the same. The ruling class carefully adheres to a script that can only be described as relentless brainwashing. Consider the following; Mikhail Gorbachev:

"We need spiritual values ^[167]. We need a revolution of the mind. this is the only way toward an new culture and a new politics that can meet the challenge of our time." ^[168]

Also,

"...along with this 'new way of thinking' will come 'universal values to take advantage of man's spiritual capital.'" ^[169]

Robert Muller, Temple of Understanding member: Calls for a,

"new code of behavior which will encompass all races, nations, religions and ideologies. It is the formulation of these new ethics which will be the greatest challenge for the new generation."

Alice Bailey, Louis Trust/World Goodwill (deceased disciple of theosophist Madame Blavatsky):

"The objective of the new social order, of the new politics, the new religion, is...to bring in the Kingdom."

Livieu Gota, Vice Director General of the UN to members of the Lucis Trust and its partner organization World Goodwill in 1990: "man must end his individual will and conform to common aspirations."

According to Gota, a universal spirituality must be achieved. Gota also said that,

"the United Nations will play a great part in developing these common aspirations. Spirituality, Gota stresses, is to be the keystone of the work of strengthening the United Nations."

Javier Perez de Cuellar, former Secretary General of the UN:

"On many occasions debates arise between the partisans of a strictly individual morality and those who believe in a community ethic that takes into account community interests. The problem of the relationship between freedom and morality will sooner or later concern the international community." ^[170]

�� William Ruckelshaus, former head of the Environmental Protection Agency:

"First, a clear set of values consistent with the consciousness of sustainability must be articulated by leaders in both the public and the private sector. Next, motivations need to be established that will support the values. Finally, institutions must be developed that will effectively apply the motivations... Mere acceptance of a changed value structure, although a prerequisite, does not generate the required change in consciousness."

Chuck Colson:

"You're only going to solve the problem by teaching people moral values early in life."

�� Vice President Al Gore:

"As Erikson one wrote, 'The possibility of species-wide destruction relates for the first time the necessity of a species-wide ethic."

�� Vaclav Havel: Calls for,

"a global revolution in the sphere of human consciousness. We still don't know how to put morality ahead of politics, science and economics."

Maurice Strong, UN Earth Summit chief:

"...revival of moral and spiritual values [is] the real key to survival of the human species."

Carl Sagan:

"What good is all the data in the world without a steadfast moral compass? It's clear that science alone cannot by any means provide the moral impetus that religion can."

Jesse Jackson: Calls for

"a social values revolution."

Zbigniew Brzezinski:

"[The new era] an emerge only as a consequence of a new historical tide that induces a change both in values and in conduct...The global crisis of the spirit has to be overcome if humanity is to assert command over its destiny."

Hillary Clinton: America suffers,

"from a sleeping sickness of the soul...who will lead us out of this spiritual vacuum?...Let us be willing to remold society."

John Paul II:

"The broadcasting industry should develop and follow a moral code that reflects family values."

Pat Robertson: Encourages Christians to become,

"a united and effective force for moral renewal in America."

Teilhard de Chardin:

"The fate of mankind, as well as of religion, depends upon the emergence of a new faith in the future." ^[171]

President Bill Clinton:

"We cannot renew our country unless we are willing to work with the churches." ^[172]

Dan Quayle: Wants public assistance to be distributed through churches and synagogues.

The desire to change the values of the West is on the lips of elitists everywhere, no matter how immoral they may be. The agenda that they seek to impose upon us is evil, and the method being used to strip us of our liberties is wicked deceit. How odd that the ruling class imagines itself fit to dictate morals to anyone!

But they are all beholden to Rome.

"President Clinton credits the catholic social teaching of [Jesuit Georgetown University] with forming his philosophy of morality and politics."

Jesuit newspaper columnist Eugene Kennedy also noted that;

"The Clinton administration, far more than that of Reagan, parallels the teachings of papal encyclicals on social polices"

of a wide variety.

The above use of the word "moral" is not to be understood in the classic Christian sense. Christianity cannot be reduced to a set of values. The faith exists only as a personal commitment to Jesus Christ as Lord and to his words as truth. Pretending that Christianity can be used as a good set of rules (as does Chuck Colson) is deceitful in the extreme.

Nothing could be more repugnant to the non-believer. Christianity is not a matter of changed rules, but of changed hearts.

Furthermore, Christianity was never meant to be a popular religion. Christians caught up in worldliness were admonished,

"Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." ^[173]

The verse emphasizes the aspect of separateness that was once well understood. Christian separation was to mark their witness to the world regarding the true God. The Christians were called adulterers and adulteresses because they loved the system, and were therefore cheating God ^[174] Any worldly system based upon popular ideas or cutting-edge philosophies cannot honestly be promoted as Christian (Whether by the Roman Catholic Church, Judaism or Chuck Colson, or anyone else for that matter).

What is meant by a new moral order instead resembles the ancient Roman religion, which had no true definition of sin or personal holiness. There was no integrity involved. The whole philosophy of the Roman religion can be summed up as obedience to the State, peace with the gods (achieved only through meticulous ritual), and "goodwill" among men.

Obviously thee is no inner, personal value with this sort of belief system. In fact, it proved so entirely unsatisfactory that Roman rulers were regularly required to import new, depraved religions from the East (whose fashion also soon passed) due to the growing, gnawing spiritual unrest of the people.

Having examined some players and major organizations involved in perpetuating the ruling-class myth, it should be clear that the New Order will much resemble earlier pagan empires, with vast control of the masses given over to a priestly caste.

The Book of Revelation indicates that in spite of the struggle that would ensue between ruling-class opponents, Rome would ultimately prevail.

"For God hath put in their hearts to fulfill his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled." ^[175].

In the end-time separation of the chaff from the wheat, Rome has her day to come.

There has been little disagreement among Bible Christians that the Roman Empire would be resuscitated. Here The Book of Revelation reiterates what was first written in the visions of The Book of Daniel.

It is high time that people realized Roman Catholicism is not a Christian faith that borrowed from the ancient Roman religion in order to welcome pagans. Roman Catholicism as well as Judaism is the ancient Babylonian-Roman religion tricked out in a few Christian trappings to fool the undiscerning.

It is "Mystery Babylon's" religion, which a brief glance at history readily confirms. Even the Church's organization is identical to that of the Roman Empire. The political structure of the New Order is that of "Mystery Babylon," according to the Bible. That the Roman Catholic Church is heir to both is also historical fact; as well it might be because the Jews took total control of the Catholic Church in the 1800s. And well the "Mystery Babylon" religion and governmental order will look like Babylon, Rome, Greco-Roman because God told us in Daniel:

"Then was the iron (Rome), the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold (Babylon), broken to pieces TOGETHER, AND BECAME LIKE THE CHAFF OF THE SUMMER THRESHING FLOORS; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth." ^[176]

Then in the story of the Wheat and the tares we see what will happen to these enemies of God and the Lord Jesus Christ.

After the fall of Babylon, the priestly college of Babylon ultimately established itself in Pergamum (called "Satan's seat" by Christ in Revelation 2:13). Attalus III, ruler of Pergamum, bequeathed his kingdom to Rome in 133 B.C.

Thereafter, the title of Pontifex Maximus (high priest) of the Babylonian priesthood was bestowed upon Roman emperors. When the title and the office were refused by Gratian in 375 A.D., they were snatched up by the bishop of Rome. To this day, the Roman Catholic pontiffs still retain the title of Pontifex Maximus, for both the Roman and Babylonian religions.

The Babylonian nature of Catholicism and Judaism was boldly attested to by Luther:

"And now farewell, unhappy, hopeless, blasphemous Rome! The wrath of God has come upon you in the end, as you deserved, and not for the many prayers which are made on your behalf, but because you have chosen to grow more evil from day to day! We have cared for Babylon and she is not healed. Let us then leave her that she may be the habitation of dragons, specters, ghosts, and witches, and true to her name Babel, an everlasting confusion, an idol of avarice, perfidy, apostasy, of cynics, lechers, robbers, sorcerers, and endless other impudent monsters, a new pantheon of wickedness."

Luther, a German Catholic monk himself, knew whereof he spoke. There seem to be few Luthers among us today. Our times can be justly compared to the years preceding Nazi Germany, when

"the German theologian...had deteriorated to an unbelieving liberalism...Understanding the moral treason of churchmen required knowledge of the doctrinal state of much of Europe during the first four decades of this century...the satanic influence."

The outright betrayal of the faith by ecumenically-minded, interfaith-mongering Protestant Christian ministers cannot pass without remark. ^[177] Theirs is by far the greater sin. Whether by ignorance of by design, they are without excuse.

Today's social woes, in large part, are due to the appalling dereliction of duty by Protestant leadership. These "pious" ones have chosen to set themselves above the fray and to serve as moral and spiritual guides for their fellow men. Yet under their watch, the morals and the strength of the West have collapsed.

This has more to do with what is coming from the pulpits than any combination of social evils; it is the paucity of truth and the dearth of spiritual wisdom on the part of Christian scholars and leaders that is doing us in. They are clothed in shame.

"I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied. But if they had stood in my counsel, and had caused my people to hear my words, then they should have turned them from their evil way, and from the evil of their doings...I have heard what the� prophets said, that prophesy lies in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed. How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbor, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal. The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the Lord...Is not my word like as a fire? saith the Lord; and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces? Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that steal my words every one from his neighbor. Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that use their tongues, and say, He saith. Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the Lord, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the Lord." ^[178]

If the current Christian leadership had a valid message, if they had anything to offer spiritually to their flocks, if the hand of God Almighty was truly guiding them, if they spoke the truth, then it is certain, and of this there is no doubt whatsoever, that Western society would be considerably better off than it is now.

Having thoroughly failed and utterly forsaken their own flocks, these religiously compromised gurus now grandly proceed into the international arena, presuming that we anxiously await their solutions to global evils.

But these petit princes have no clothes. They parade before us poor, miserable, blind and naked.

���� "'There is a conspiracy of her prophets in the midst thereof, like a roaring lion ravening the prey; they have devoured souls; they have taken the treasure and precious things; they have made her many widows in the midst thereof.' ^[179]

���� The ecumenical-interfaith ruling class myth, with its roots stretching from Babylon and its vine choking every succeeding empire, provides insights about conspiracy that are unavailable elsewhere. Given that the very same myth was successfully used by ancient Babylon and her successors for control over populace and rulers alike, history provides a reliable motif for our own future as well. The Babylonian priesthood had much to gain by treating such unity, because their temples served as not only 'the courts of justice and of astronomical and medical science, the official legal archives and [where] extensive science collections were kept,"

but they also contained the public treasury.

Furthermore:

"...since the priests attached to the temples remained for all times not only the scribes, but the authors of all literary productions, and the exponents of the entire intellectual life, the literature never lost its association with religion."

And,

"the whole of life was thought of as a unified religious exercise."

The priesthood wielded absolute control over every aspect of life and all knowledge, creating complete dependency with their ecumenical myth which was adjusted as necessary to sustain control.

If it appears that the Babylonian priesthood had unparalled power, then mention must be made that the quotes above could almost equally apply to Catholic monks in the papist Dark Ages:

"The medieval spirit, in all its various manifestations, aimed at universal empire by way of external and visible rule...The idea of the State was the Holy Roman Empire actually embracing and dominating over all the countries of Europe; its idea of the Church, that visible and tangible catholicity which existed before the great Reformation; and in the department of knowledge it showed its characteristic quality in its desire to embrace in one system, under one science, the whole of human thought."

The control of human thought processes is the key to human bondage, and is one of the most horrifying aspects of the 1000-year duration of the Dark Ages. When Rome's priestcraft was in the ascendancy, the effect was almost immediate.

"Although personal and institutional libraries were an important feature of Greco-Roman culture, none survived the dissolution of the Western Roman Empire."

Curious, is it not? All the libraries vanished.

During the Dark Ages, with very few exceptions, books were kept in churches and monasteries for the singular benefit of the clergy:

"...only a particularly privileged outsider, such as a well-known scholar, might have access to them."

The books were mostly in Latin; when learning was later institutionalized (12th century) education was set forth in the long-dead Latin tongue. In this manner knowledge was sealed in the precincts of the privileged ^[180].

The Bible, written in Latin, was entirely forbidden. Like a sop thrown to the wretched masses, Roman Catholic images served as "books for the unlearned" in the none-too-generous words of Thomas Aquinas.

So, for hundreds upon hundreds of years, all knowledge was greedily squirrelled away by the Roman Catholic Church. Consequently Western man was reduced to intolerable serfdom and kept under through enforced ignorance. ^[181] This highly successful technique of control was also used in the Tibetan monasteries formerly ruled by the current Dalai Lama, before his theocracy was overthrown: "Before 1950, secular education was non-existent."

Literacy was strictly "the privilege of monks and the nobility." The lot of the common man, as in the Dark Ages, was predictable:

"a large percentage of the [over one million] people, most of them concentrated in central Tibet, were serfs tied to an estate by birth...95% of the land was held by 3 groups: the fewer than 200 families comprising 10,000 nobles, the monasteries with 120,000 monks and 13,000 nuns, and the government, run by 333 lamas and 280 nobles."

The "religious and administrative power centered in one person": the Dalai Lama, the same Dalai Lama who now compass land and sea seeking to restore his former kingdom.

The essential nature of religious power and those who seek it, hasn't changed one whit. Whether it is travelling under the guise of Rockefeller's beatific vision, or is fostered upon us as the gooey ecumenical-interfaith "unity of all men," ideas of power like tantalizing sugar-plums are dancing under noble brows.

But let us not lose sight of the fact that the common denominator in each case is the spirit of sacerdotalism, which elevates the priesthood to an underservedly lofty position. As one-worlder H.G. Wells wrote in The Shape of Things to Come (1933),

"And it must needs be the work, first of all, of an aggressive order of religiously devoted men and women who will try out and establish and impose a new pattern of living upon our race."

Wells recognized the power of priestcraft over the affairs of men as essential to the success of world government; without it, failure was assured (as witnessed with socialism). Winning the minds of men is not enough, it is the souls that must be captured, it is the spiritual nature that must be manipulated for complete takeover.

The Bible has been subjected to many fabulous accusations, and it seems appropriate here to address the charge that the Scriptures were manufactured for the purpose of ruling-class control.

Although this is a convenient concept for those who wish to ignore the Bible and its God, it is a matter of rash, uninformed folly to anyone familiar with history, religion or the Scriptures themselves.

In fact, little can be understood about conspiracy, its full history or its chilling ramifications for the future without acknowledging the Bible's significance in history.

The New Testament gives no support to a sacerdotal system of any kind. Church leadership is one thing, the sacerdotalism that characterizes Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy is quite another. Indeed, Peter himself referred to all Christians as "a royal priesthood." It is illogical to conclude that there is a Scriptural basis for human bondage to a priestly caste.

The Bible is not in itself a controlling myth.

"Most Jews and Christians had agreed that God gave humankind in creation the gift of moral freedom."

When freed from the mythic-religious traditions of men (whether rabbinic or so-called Christians), the Bible emphasizes personal (not collective) responsibility towards God.

A controlling myth always engenders collectivism. For example, the recent doctrine of societal evils results in collective culpability and consequently requires binding collective solutions.

In comparison, the Bible teaches about personal sin with individual responsibility resulting in voluntary personal change. The West operated quite successfully on this basis for some time. As this sense of Christianity is lost, many personal freedoms are being lost along with it.

It is absurd to argue that the Bible was written as an instrument of control when the Bible has been consistently forbidden throughout its whole history, by Roman emperors, Roman pontiffs, and other strong-armed dictators.

Only recently has the Bible been again allowed in Russia and Eastern Europe. It continues to be banned in Moslem countries.

From the time of earliest Christianity, the New Testament has been the bane of despots everywhere because (unlike the lipservice paid to such principles today) it fostered real individual dignity and freedom, and deflated their controlling mythologies.

So great was this threat that

"copies were ruthlessly hunted down and destroyed"

during the Roman Empire, and the papal Dark Ages. Emperors and popes would brook no knowledge competing with their own prevailing myth. Our English Bible was quite literally born in blood.

Out of the nearly 2,000 years since the New Testament was written, the Bible has been allowed free course in the West for less than 500 years, and during those 500 years, free society has flourished wherever the Scriptures took root.

This is a matter of history. Freedom does not prosper under a controlling myth, but just the opposite (as is demonstrated by the full weight of historical evidence).

England's King Henry the VIII delivered the blow that ultimately brought Roman tyranny to an end (and is unceasingly vilified to this day for it) by launching the revolution known as the Reformation.

Until Henry's decree in the early 1500s, the Bible was still forbidden under penalty of death. Not only did Henry break with Rome, but he allowed the Bible to be published in the English language and decreed that the churches must allow the common man to avail himself of it:

"...in the Englyshe tounge, to be fyxed and set vp openlye in euery of the sayd paryshe churches."

Henry was the true father of "Protestantism," which is defined as "freedom to dissent." ^[182] The truth is self-evident; from the fount of the Scriptures, all of our freedoms and prosperity flow. ^[183]

Encouraging such liberties is anathemas to emperors, popes, and the ruling class:

"The elevation of individual conscience above the revealed truth taught by the historic Church is a protestant heresy."

This one statement exemplifies the spiritual despotism that Rome has always been famous for. It also reveals the nature of all syncretistic, elitist ideology.

The individual conscience is one's very soul, which Rome would keep in her fetters; likewise it is the souls of all mankind that will be bound (in their own words!) by the forthcoming Global Ethic. Despite all appearances to the contrary, Hans Kung is truly a loyal son of Rome.

As an inevitable result of the Bible, the Reformation

"forwarded the principle of nationality, a principle entirely alien to the Holy Roman Empire."

Henry freed the West with a stoke of his pen. A hundred years after Henry's reign, the Empire lay stripped of its power, existing only in barest form. The Romish monster had been laid to rest.

From that time, the Protestant nations (Great Britain, Switzerland, et al) began to uphold a standard of individual liberty so superior to all others that it remains to this day the envy of nations.

Having prospered in their climate of moral and intellectual freedom, these countries ultimately increased the opportunities and wealth of the common man, and raised him from abject serfdom to the high standard of living yet commonplace in Protestant lands. (We still have the middle-class to prove it). Arguments about greedy industrialists and global corporate iniquity notwithstanding, look at the lot of the West's common man in comparison to his counterparts elsewhere tells the true story.

On the other hand, the myth-mongering Constantine is credited with "Christianizing" the Roman Empire, but nothing could be further from the truth.

"Constantine was not so much a worshipper of Christ as he was a worshipper of himself...[he] considered himself the incarnation of 'the supreme god, a combination of Apollo, Mithra, Jupiter, the sun and Christ...A contemporary historian said Constantine was more greedy for praise than it is possible to tell.'"

Constaine recognized the threat that Christianity presented to the moribund and unsatisfying religions of the time and therefore, to his own regime.

Separation, the hallmark of Christianity, interfered with Constaintine's collectivism. "Let us cherish peace ^[184] and forbearance" saith Constantine with a deceitful tongue worthy of a true Caesar,

"for it would be truly disastrous that we should assail one another. Let us banish strife."

The similarity of Constantine's controlling myth to today's prevailing philosophy is no mere coincidence. We are simply witnessing the latest incarnation of the same Babylonian collectivism that has bedeviled man throughout history.

Thus, Constantine put Christianity at the service of the Empire in a wholly corrupted form, in order not to disturb the Empire's pagan, hybridized composition. By the time that heathen religions were banned, Christianity had been reduced to a state that allowed easy absorption of pagans into the Church.

Had the Scriptures been given free rein, the Roman emperors and the Catholic Church would not, with their mythology, have had such wide berth to force conversions or to commit so many other horrors.

The Christian is not permitted to force conversions. When a person becomes a Christian, it is a personal commitment made willingly. A forced conversion makes a most unsatisfactory Christian. True Christianity has never been the business of the State, except for the State's attempts to eradicate it.

Nor does Christianity call for the rooting out of pagans, but rather winning pagans with a message of truth. The typical pagan was able to see the superiority of Christianity in preference to his own ghastly heathen rituals and beliefs. Jesus told his disciples:

"If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."

Truth! Freedom! His words are a knife in the heart of every elitist. Political necessity moved Constantine to enact laws that grossly mixed Christianity with paganism in order to protect his controlling mythology. Christians preferring to worship in truth according to individual conscience were severely punished: "the authorities practiced violent coercion."

Roman Catholicism followed suit: its earliest teachings would steal away the freedom and liberty that God granted to man. ^[185] Among the worst of Catholicism's deceptions is that "free will is the cause of our doing evil."

Immeasurable grief and sorrow caused by this seminal belief and the hateful traditions springing from it would reverberate throughout the world during the centuries when Rome ruled... that is, until the Protestant Reformation.

Revelation 22:11 says plainly,

"He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still."

Let him, Constantine's moral posturing and oppression of individual conscience before God received no support from the Scriptures.

Neither does Rome find justification there for the blood on her hands, for her iniquitous Inquisitions and savage massacres. Not a word of succor can be found for binding Global Ethics or force-fed Moral Orders.

Not a chance, not a breath, not a prayer. These are merely elitist inventions of men, the real meaning and end result of the "Church traditions" that Rome so loves to flaunt in her insufferable, ungodly presumptuousness. Perhaps not telling of all is that,

"it was American Roman Catholic bishops in the middle and late 19th Century who demanded the removal of Bible reading from public schools..."

Why? The full weight of history confirms that the Bible has been and continues to be opposed by those seeking to destroy freedom, but those seeking to bring mankind into bondage. This speaks volumes about the worth and the truth of the Bible.

The West's tyrants of tomorrow are even now painting heavily against it, and in particular, the 17th-century King James Version used throughout this article. The King James Version is based on the Textus Receptus (also banned by Rome) with Hebrew and Greek texts differing from all other modern verses.

Sadly, it appears that most people would rather return to servile bondage, for there are few who read the Bible, and even fewer who have the courage to decide what it means for themselves.

But this will exact a heavy price. By relying upon the words of men about the word of God (instead of relying upon one's own ability, with the help of the Holy Ghost, to understand the Bible) the common man accepts lies about God, because those lies are soothing, sound good, and appeals to their sensibilities, and acquiesces to his own destruction.

Having never read the Bible, one is entirely at the mercy of those religious leaders (and they are legion who wish to enslave us.

As the Bible increasingly falls into disfavor, familiar monsters again appear very close to our throats. Advertising for the Jesuit Catholic World Report laments that democracy is destroying Catholicism because in our system, "it is simply one faith among many," dangerously suggesting either that Rome should be the only faith, or that democracy must go. Either would, in fact, result in the other.

To thwart patriots (or more to the point, a Protestant spirit of nationalism), the U.S. Roman Catholic bishops and the Jews have outlawed flags within the churches except for very special occasions. On the subject of world government, the Catholic bishop of Verdun, France stated;

"every nation must renounce its ultimate sovereignty to this universal authority. This is an obligation! If nations, if rules of nations, if public opinion will not accept this renunciation, then they really are voting for war, however beautiful may be their speeches on peace ^[186]."

Consider again the Parliament's Global Ethic as it trumpets the familiar refrain:

"Every form of egoism should be rejected. All selfishness, whether individual or collective, whether in the form of class thinking, racism, nationalism or sexism."

This skillfully crafted New Order Network brings with it a deliberate confusion of terms to hide the fact that communist tenets have indeed triumphed over the West ^[187], not vice versa. ^[188]

Nationalism has become the equivalent of egoism and selfish-ness, instead of a freedom from priestcraft gained from the Reformation. Consequently, through priestraft, the new enslavement comes.

Newly beatified Opus Dei founder Jose Escriva described nationalism as "a disease against the authentic, patriotic Christian spirit."

Implicit here is that such "Christian patriotism" extends exclusively towards Rome and Judaism. Even more pointedly, empire-builder John Paul II recently branded nationalist fervor as "a new paganism." Thus it is clear for all to see if they will only look, the defunct controlling myth has been revived in an even more virulent, evil and wicked form!

"...they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace." ^[189]

To help clarify the meaning of some parts of this presentation, we have a comments to help establish a basis for our mutual understanding. We are using Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language 1989, to define "victim, snare, and infest" as follows:

�� * Victim: "1. a person who suffers from a destructive or��������������������� injurious action or agency. 2. a person who is����������������������� deceived or cheated, as by his own emotions or�������������������� ignorance or by some impersonal agency. 3. a person�������������� or animal sacrificed, or regarded as sacrificed. 4. a���������������� living creature sacrificed in religious rites."

�� * Snare: "2. anything serving to entrap, entangle, or catch������������������ unawares; trap. 5. to catch or involve by trickery or���������������� wile..."

�� * Infest: "to haunt or overrun in a troublesome manner, as���������������� predatory bands, destructive animals, or vermin do."

�� * America: The word "America" means "THE KINGDOM������������������ OF HEAVEN." Did our school teachers and our������������������ preachers ever explain to us the true meaning of����������������� the word "America?"

Wouldn't it be considerate if we were to be informed as to the true meaning of the name of our beloved homeland? Has the Establishment been hiding something from us relating to our true identity? Corporate public schools (government controlled) teach us that this Continent was named after Amerigo Vespucci.

However, these corporate government schools neglect to teach our children the meaning of Amerigo Vespucci's name. Professor Miskovsky (Oberlin College) brought out some interesting facts about the word "America."

The Latin masculine singular for the word "Amerigo" is "Americus" and the feminine singular is "America." The old Gothic form for the word "America" is "Amel Ric." "Amel" means "heaven" and "ric" means "kingdom." "Amel Ric" is found in the German language as "Emmerich" or "Himmelreich."

Thus "Amel Ric," "Emmerich," "Himmelreich," "Amelukah," "Amerucah," and "America" became words for "THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN!" The word "kingdom" means government or governmental jurisdiction. the government of Heaven (from outer space) is to be fully implemented on earth as we are told in the "Lords Prayer."

Strong's Concordance gives the word "Meluwkah" for "kingdom," "Amelukah" and "Meluwkah" are related. A professor by the name of Odlum indicates that the letter "l" and "r" are sometimes interchangeable. The Hebrew "Meluwkah" became "Merukah" and "Amelukah" became "Ameruch," the later being the Latin form of the word "America."

Who is America that she would be blessed above every other nation along with the other Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Celtic and kindred peoples in the world (Isaac's Sons - Saxon's) "Christian" nations, today are prophetically carrying out exactly what Israel is supposed to do in the last days.

We {the White Anglo-Saxon, Germantic, Celtic and kindred people are the descendants of the Ten Tribed Northern Kingdom of Israel which included people of the Southern Two Tribes. We migrated North and west beyond the Caucuses Mountains into Asia and on to the America's.

Information about this migration over time is plentiful and well documented. We are the House of Jacob and we are suffering Jacob's troubles.

The Encyclopedia Americana calls Hyrcanus a Jewish high priest [135‑105 B.C.] who forced the Idumeans to become "Jews." Idumea is the Greek for Edomites.

The works of Josephes relates how the Idumeans were forced to accept Judaism. In the Bible Esau, Edo, Mt. Seir and Idumea are interchangeable for the offspring of ESAU, Jacob's twin brother. So now we are aware that the story of America does not begin with Columbus, but with Abraham who,

"looked for a City (system) which hath Foundations, whose Builder and Maker is God." ^[190]

References for the information about America was from: Ewing Curtis Clair; Kingdom Digest; March, 1968 and Basics of National Identity by M.O. Andrews. The Voice of Liberty, % 692 Sunnybrook Drive, Decatur, Georgia 30033, 2nd printing 1979.

"And to the woman {the true seed remnant of Israel - not the Jews} were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness {North America} into her place, where she is nourished for a time and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent." ^[191]

�� * Serpent: For the identification and definition of our use���������������� of the word "Serpent" we will quote Scriptural�������������������� passages attributed to the sayings of Jesus, the�������������������� Christ, but first we need to put you on the trail of�������������� the "Pharisees" and the "Sadducees" to whom Jesus��������������� frequently speaks directly in the flesh. And Christ���������������� speaks about their generation (serious study will���������������� reveal their mixed racial lineage, hence the������������������������ attention their "generation").

The mixed mongrel generation (race) of people who today call themselves Jews, from their own publications, clearly lay claim and trace their identity to being the physical flesh and blood descendants of the Scriptural Pharisees and the Sadducees.

One account published by the Jewish historian Louis Finkelstine in his two volume History of the Jews. In this work, he explains that the Pharisees and Sadducees were {are} Jews. Finkelstine also speaks of Jews making slaves of Christians. In another work by Louis Finkelstine. The Pharisees, 2nd Ed., Vol. I. The Jewish Publication Society - 1940, pp. xx-xxi., we find the following quote:

"The apogee of Pharisaism is the Talmud of Babylonia... Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name...the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives unaltered."

From the Epilogue section chapter 9 subtitle Character Roles & Identity from the book Who is Esau-Edom, quoting the entire chapter:

���� "There is one thing that is unmistakably evident regarding the Bible and that is, it is about a particular race of people-the direct descendants of Adam later called Israel. They are the main characters in God's Script - the Holy Bible. Esau-Edom is� secondary character in this Script.

���� Only when we know and identify the white European people as the Israel people, and the Jews as the Edomites, do things in the world make complete sense. When the roles of Jacob and Esau are identified, we see that everything is happening exactly as written in the Scriptures.

���� The problem the world has been plagued with is a case of mistaken identity and unknown identity regarding the roles God has assigned to Esau and Jacob. Esau does not like the role he has been assigned {or shall we say the role that he has earned}. He thus has been trying to rewrite the Scriptures and alter in the minds of Christians their identity and the identity of the Jews in the Scripture. Thus it is believe that Esau {Jews} is Jacob {God's Chosen People}, and Jacob {the White Race} is just a 'gentile.'

���� No one can deny that the Jews are a most unique and unusual people. That uniqueness exists because of their Edomite heritage. No other people fit the characteristics and follow the role of Esau-Edom so completely as do the Jewish people. The Jews follow the role that their ancestors the Edomites had followed. The Jew, however, is not just the descendant of Esau-Edom, but also of the other individuals and tribes that have intermarried with Esau. This would include the Hittites, the Canaanites, the descendants of Japheth through Gomer, Togarmah, Magog, and Ashkenaz, and the descendants of Ham through Canaan, Cush, and Nimrod, as well as the Israelites and Judahites that mixed with them {contrary to God's Law}.

���� Thus, in a sense, the Jews do not have a heritage in the Bible, and yet they do not. As mongrels or hybrids, the Jews do have some biological roots extending back to Abraham and the patriarchs. But as mongrels, they can never possess the birthright or claim true heritage of the original or pure Adamic race. For it is written: 'A mongrel shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord.' ^[192] 'Now it came to pass, when they had heard the LAW, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.' ^[193]

�� ��Mixed Adamites, those possessing both Adamic and non-Adamic blood, can no more be a part of heir of the Adamic race that one who is entirely of another race. The law will not allow the Jews to inherit the birthright or the kingdom regardless of the fact that they have Adamic blood in them. These same mongrels and 'mixed multitude' tried to tell Christ that Abraham was their father, but Christ said: 'I know that you are Abraham's SEED; but you seek to kill me because my word has no place in you...I speak that which I have seen with my Father; and you do that which you have seen with your father...If you were Abraham's CHILDREN, you would do the works of Abraham. You do the deeds of your father.' ^[194]

���� Christ made the implication that these 'Jews' had another father aside from Abraham, and their response was 'We be not born Of fornication; we have one Father, even God.' But Christ said; 'If God were your Father you would love me.' Can you think of anyone that hates Christ more than these people known as Jews today?

���� The Jews cannot represent the Adamic line, they can only claim to be of those lines from Adam that were either rejected by God or who had violated the law through interracial marriages. Esau-Edom falls under both of these classes. The Edomites were a mongrelized and rejected people throughout the entire Bible.

���� Conspiracy and Conflict: It should by now be seen why talk of an 'International Jewish Conspiracy' makes no sense to the general public. They don't see or understand anything of the kind because they do not know the identity of the characters in the Scriptures of God-the Bible-or their roles in that Scripture. Why would the Jews, which the entire church world holds up as the apple of God's eye, want to harm or destroy White Christians?

���� As heirs of Esau, the Jews are destined to act according to an assigned role. The Jews need not be part of a conspiracy to dominate the world, or a plot to kill Christians or to destroy their civilization. The Jews, or some of them, are used by God to execute His plans in the earth. Jews follow this role in God's Scripture and have been doing these things and will continue to do them whether or not they have any plans or knowledge of doing them. A lion kills to eat because God had assigned such attributes to its ancestors {race} when He created them.

���� They cannot help what they are or what they do, they act in such a manner because it is ingrained within their constitution to do so. Likewise {you will note upon study and observation that} the Jew is hostile, abrasive, hateful, ungodly, a destroyer, and a usurer because such attributed and roles {or prophecies} were assigned to the ancestors of the Jews - Esau/Edom. A Divine Plan for Evil: All of Christendom is united in the belief that all of the ills and troubles of this world are the result of an invisible, spirit, a devil or Satan, which is in competition with God for control of this world.

���� We must always remember to mistrust the obvious and that which is popular, for such things are often the opposite of what they appear. The Bible supplies us with scores of illustrations in support of this hypothesis. Many biblical messages reveal that the popular belief and ways of the people are contrary or opposite to the ways of God. As Jesus Christ stated: 'For that which is highly esteemed among men is an abomination in the sight of God.' ^[195]

���� Likewise, that which is exalted by man, God will make low, and that which is of low degree, God will exalt. ^[196]� There is perhaps nothing that is more highly esteemed and exalted by the church world than these God-cursed heathen mongrels called 'Jews' today. There could be no greater evidence that these Jews are not God's people than the universal belief that they are.

���� Thus the organized church world, which has been influenced by Jewish indoctrination, had to have a scapegoat for certain evil things that happen. They teach that our adversary is either something spiritual, such as an invisible devil, or is something yet to come, such as the future antichrist.

���� In other words, our foe is something we cannot fight against because it is not physical or not yet physically here. The result is that the Jew, our real physical enemy, the one we can fight, or expel out of our land, or kill, is free to assail us at will because the Judaized churches say they are God's Chosen People.

���� In a speech, 'Given by Senator Joseph McCarthy, six months before his mouth was closed forever: George Washington's surrender: 'And many of the people of the land became Jews.' ^[197]

���� The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians. History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington that American independence came, and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the twentieth century.

���� Jonathan Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that 'a holy war will now being in America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.' Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction: 'Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government.

���� That government they believe to be divine will be the British Empire [under the control of the Jews]. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry [Lucifer - as Albert Pike disclosed in Morals and Dogma].' And indeed George Washington was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army.'

���� Cornwallis well knew that his military defeat was only the beginning of World Catastrophe that would be universal and that unrest would continue until mind control could be accomplished through a false religion. WHAT HE PREDICTED HAS COME TO PASS!!! Of that, there is no longer any doubt. A brief study of American religious history will show that Masonry and Judaism has infused into every church in America their veiled Phallic Religion. Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell [both Jews] started Jehovah Witnesses' in order to spread Judaism throughout the world under the guise of Christianity. Also we have: 'As Jewish Maurice Samuel in his 'You Gentiles,' (1924) p. 13 stated, 'there are essentially two peoples as spiritual forces in the world - Jews and White Christian people.' It is not a conflict between God and a supernatural devil which Judaized theologians invented. Jewish 'scholars' have promoted both the devil and future antichrist concepts.

���� They know that as long as the Christians believe that imaginary spooks are the 'evil forces' which are to blame for their problems., conflicts, wars, etc., they will never see that it is the Jew who God has assigned as an evil force here and now. The result is that Christians will never lift a finger against the menacing Jew as their European ancestors had done occasionally.

���� Our adversaries are whoever God assigns to that role or who He has made with an evil, ungodly disposition.

���� Thus throughout all Biblical history the adversaries of God's people were always 'flesh and blood people, usually those of some other race. Yes, the evil, destructive and hostile Edomite Jews were made that way by God: 'I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.' ^[198] 'Behold, I have created the smith who blows the coals in the fire...and have created the waster to destroy.' ^[199] 'The Lord has made all things for himself, yes, even the wicked for the day of evil.' ^[200] Evil, wicked persons are a part of God's plan of this world, persons who would be against His order, His law and His people. No supernatural devil exists in this plan. 'but could we not preach the word of God to these wicked {Esau} Edomite-Canaanite Jews converting them to righteousness? No, for God says they are born that way and will not turn: 'The wicked are estranged from the womb; They go astray as soon as they are born, speaking lies.' ^[201] These Edomite-Canaanites are born with un-Godly traits. God didn't tell Joshua to convert them. He told Joshua to slay them. God promises their destruction not their conversion ^[202]. Even if raised in a righteous environment the Edomite will still be wicked. ^[203] Thus Esau-Edom and his Canaanite brethren are not an extinct and no longer existing people {as they would have you believe}. They are in the world today, and they are still at their ancient task of defying God today, and attempting to corrupt and destroy God's true Israel people. They are still in God's Script acting out their role in the world. But their final scene draws near and their time of destruction is at hand."

From: Adam and Cain, p. 178, by Wm. N. Murray, former Governor of Oklahoma (1951):

���� "Mr. W. Smith, who was for many years private secretary to Billy (William Ashley) Sunday, the Evangelist, makes a statement on oath before a Notary Public of Wayne, Michigan.

���� The statement is to the following effect: President Coolidge shortly before his term of office expired, said publicly that he did not choose to compete again for the Presidency of the United States. Shortly afterwards, Billy Sunday interviewed him. Coolidge told him that after taking office, he found himself unable to carry out his election promises or to make the slightest move towards clean government. HE WAS FORCED AND DRIVEN BY THREATS, EVEN MURDER-THREATS, TO CARRY OUT THE ORDERS OF THE JEWS. Billy Sunday made public this statement of Coolidge. There followed a general attack upon the Evangelist. Then his son was framed and committed suicide, whilst the father's death was hastened in sorrow for the loss."

With this background in mind, we can better understand our use of the definition of the word "Serpent" as used by Jesus Christ.

From the Scriptures then, Esau-Edomite Jews {Pharisees and Sadducees} are identified as "Serpents" by Jesus The Christ.

���� "You {non-Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot clearly say why...Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe from Jewish invasion...We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and WE ARE THE ARCH-PLOTTERS OF UNIVERSAL WARS AND THE CHIEF BENEFICIARIES OF THOSE WARS. We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism. Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!...You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it?...You make much noise and fury about undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But WHAT IS THAT COMPARED TO OUR STAGGERING INFLUENCE IN YOUR CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, YOUR LAWS AND YOUR GOVERNMENT, AND THE VERY THOUGHTS YOU THINK EVERY DAY?...' The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right...we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?

���� If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization...You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. WE ARE INTRUDERS. WE ARE SUBVERTERS. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them. WE{Jews} HAVE BEEN AT THE BOTTOM OF NOT MERELY OF THE LATEST WAR {WWI} BUT OF NEARLY ALL YOUR WARS, NOT ONLY OF THE RUSSIAN BUT OF EVERY OTHER MAJOR REVOLUTION IN YOUR HISTORY. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. WE ARE STILL DOING IT. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it...Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.

���� But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. WE CONQUERED YOU as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the French, the American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long way off. WE STILL DOMINATE YOU...

���� Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield Bible} and alien faith {Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity} which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you ever-lastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to accept in full...We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses, paralyzed your desires...So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make no bones about telling you why...

���� You Christians worry and complain about the Jew's influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own.

���� And you declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your orderly development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is. THE INFLUENCE, on the other hand, IS certainly THERE, and IT IS VASTLY GREATER AND MORE INSIDIOUS THAN YOU APPEAR TO REALIZE...

���� That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake.

���� WE ARE CONSCIOUS OF THE INJURY WE DID WHEN WE IMPOSED UPON YOU OUR ALIEN FAITH AND TRADITIONS. And then you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles, we see with relief, WILL NEVER KNOW THE REAL BLACKNESS OF OUR CRIMES...You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. IT IS THE TRUTH, and I cower at your discovery...

���� We undoubtedly had a sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and IT IS simply A FACT THAT WE WERE THE PRIME MOVERS IN THE BOURGEOIS DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTIONS OF THE CENTURY BEFORE LAST, BOTH IN FRANCE AND AMERICA. If we were not, we did not know our own interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th Century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities.

���� They benefitted us...You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?" ^[204]

�� a). Speaking to the scribes, Pharisees (Esau-Edomite��������������� Jews), Jesus said:

"Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets." ^[205]

�� b). Speaking to the scribes, Pharisees (Esau-Edomite��������������� Jews) Jesus said:

"Ye Serpents, ye generation {race} of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" ^[206]

�� c). And in John 8:44 Jesus said of the Pharisees and other�������� Esau-Edomite Jews:

"Ye are {descendants} of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it..."

�� d). In verse 47 Jesus relentlessly continues to identify the���������� Pharisees and other Esau-Edomite Jews for exactly�������������� what they are by telling them and us, as students of the�������� Word of God, that they are definitely NOT of God:

"He that is of God hearth God's words: ye therefore hear them not; because ye are not of God."

�� e).The Jews then tried to kill Christ:

"Then took they {Jews} up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by." ^[207]

From the Scholarly Dakes's Annotated Reference Bible, 19th printing 1988, we become aware of the following interesting information, all on page 104 of the New Testament section: That Jewish Claims that the Jews {identified above as Serpents by Jesus} were somehow befitting of the "Chosen People" category is absolutely and consistently refuted by Jesus the Christ as shown below:

�� f). Jesus denied the;

"Jewish claim of being children of freedom refuted by Jesus." ^[208]

�� g). He also denied the:

"Jewish claim of being children of Abraham refuted by Jesus." ^[209]

�� h). He also denied the:

"Jewish claim of being children of God refuted by Jesus." ^[210]

�� i). He further denied:

"Jewish claim of His nationality and source of power refuted by Jesus." ^[211]

The Dake's Annotated Reference Bible is the product developed from Finis Jennings Drake's approximately 100,000 hours and over a period of 43 years of searching the Scriptures. The very short Scriptural Book of Obadiah deals with the future destruction and sin of Edom. The Day of the Lord, the restoration of Israel {Anglo-Saxon's; Isaac's Sons a hidden treasure} and the Messiah's Eternal Kingdom {Government}. In referring to the "extermination of Edom" ^[212]

�� j). Obadiah 18 states:

"And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it."

�� k). And we read in Romans 9:13:

"As it is written, Jacob I loved, but Esau have I hated." ^[213]

�� l). And from the Book of Jasher 26:17 we read:

"Esau was a designing and deceitful man."

�� m). Question: If the house of Jacob {descendants} and���������������������� the house of Joseph {descendants} are to ��������������������������"devour" {destroy} the house of Esau������������������������������� {descendants} in The Day of The Lord, which is����������������� YET to happen, then there must be, today, here������������������ and now, literally physical descendants of all��������������������� three "houses" living here physically on earth - is���������������� �this not correct?

Consequently, it would appear that it is vitally important for each of us to know which house {descendants} to whom we belong or to whom we don't belong - after all we don't want to be lining up with the losers do we?

Do you want to be among the house of fire, so as to devour the stubble or do you prefer to be a supporter of the house of stubble? Jesus Christ WAS NOT A JEW. He is a Divine Creation sharing lineage from the tribe of Judah {the pure seed branch}.

A Jew is not an Israelite and a Jew is not a Hebrew. And a Jew is not a Judean as you have been lead to believe. But this is another study which requires detailed examination. We hope to be able to provide you at another time.

We know this is a very touchy subject but the truth is the truth. Ye the Bible says He was accused of being "King of the Jews." But this was Pilate mocking the Jews. Also remember the Jews were mocking Jesus. The translators should have put the word "Judean" in this passage. If you will study this issue, you will find mistranslations which tend to be misleading.

Following is an expose on Jewish Ritual Murder which is currently being conducted just as it has for centuries.

����������������������������������� Chapter Six

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

On May 1, 1989, the Oprah Winfrey show had as its guest a person who, as a young girl, was forced to participate in a ritual in which a Christian infant was sacrificed. The amazing thing about this guest is that she was not affiliated with some unknown radical blood letting cult, but that SHE WAS A JEW. According to an article on the show in the "Chicago Tribune," the woman was "undergoing long‑term psychiatric treatment," apparently because of her horrible experience. The news paper article is quoted below in its entirety.

JEWS PROTEST SACRIFICE TALE ON OPRAH SHOW

��������������������������� Chicago Tribune, 5/7/89

���������������������� New York Times News Service

���� "Hundreds of television viewers and the leaders of several Jewish and civil liberties organizations have protested allegations on a popular talk show last week that some Jews practice ritual killing of children. The allegations were made by a guest using the pseudonym Rachel on 'The Oprah Winfrey Show,' a widely viewed syndicated talk show. During the program, broadcast Monday, Winfrey introduced the guest as someone who was undergoing long‑term psychiatric treatment for a multiple personality disorder. The woman told Winfrey that she had witnessed the ritual sacrifice of children and had been a victim of ritualistic abuse.

���� The guest also said of such practices: 'there's other Jewish families across the country. It's not just my family.' The assertions were made during a program that focused on the cult murders of at least 13 people whose bodies were found last month near Matamoros, Mexico.

���� The woman's comments provoked hundreds of angry phone calls and letters to Jewish and civil liberties groups, spokesmen for the groups said in interviews late last week. Jeffrey Jacobs, the chief operating officer of Winfrey's production company, Harpo Productions Inc., denied Winfrey had acted irresponsibly in broadcasting the interview since she had emphasized on the show that the guest spoke only for herself. He added that Winfrey and her producers would meet with representatives of the Jewish and civil liberties groups next week in Chicago, where the show is taped. Winfrey was traveling Friday, Jacobs said, and was unavailable for comment. Early in the interview Winfrey said, 'This is the first time I have heard of any Jewish people sacrificing babies, but anyway ‑‑ so you witnessed the sacrifice?'

���� The woman responded: 'Right. When I was very young, I was forced to PARTICIPATE IN THAT, and which I HAD TO SACRIFICE AN INFANT.' The guest was repeatedly identified by Winfrey as being Jewish. At one point, the woman asserted that {Jewish} RITUAL SACRIFICES OCCURRED IN OTHER JEWISH FAMILIES AROUND THE COUNTRY AND THAT THEY WERE KNOWN TO THE POLICE."

COULD JEWISH RITUAL MURDER STILL EXIST?

At one time or another the Jews have been expelled from every country in Europe. And in almost every case it was over the charge of Ritual Murder.

The most objective book on this subject available is "Jewish Ritual Murder" by Arnold Leese is available from "THE TRUTH AT LAST," P.O. Box 1211, Marietta, Georgia 30061, for $3.50 per copy. The accusation was that during the Jewish feasts of Purim and/or Passover extremist Hassidic Orthodox Jewish sects would sacrifice a Christian youth for his blood. It was then dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes or bread for eating in order for the Jews to gain atonement in the eyes of God. It is possible that Purim blood might sometimes have been held over for the Passover.

THE HISTORY OF JEWISH HUMAN SACRIFICE

The ancient Khazar Jews along with� other of that Near East era followed a common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to burn a young person upon an altar called a Tophet.

The Old Testament of the Bible mentions this practice and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums would be beaten loudly to drown out the cries of the children being burned alive. In the days of Ancient Israel the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to drown out their screams.

The Carthaginians also were worshippers of Baal and sacrificed children on a massive scale. When faced with defeat in Syracuse in 310 B.C., they cast the sons of 500 nobles into a fiery pit, or Tophet, from a scaffold shaped in the likeness of the god Baal.

One expose of the subject of Ritual Murder was written in great detail by Arnold S. Leese, entitled "My� Irrelevant Defence on Jewish Ritual Murder," London, 1938. Addressing the issue of sacrifices, Mr. Leese states:

"Let a Jew speak for us here... 'Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was stated ^[214] to be 'without any religious convictions.' wrote what he himself described as 'an impartial study of the history and sociology of the Jews.' calling his book L'Antisemitisme; in the 1904 edition of this, Vol. II, p. 215, he writes, after mentioning the accusations against the Jews of Ritual Murder: 'To this general belief are added the suspicions, often justified, against the Jews addicted to magical practices. Actually, in the Middle Ages, the Jew was considered by the people as the magician par excellence; one finds many formulae of exorcism in the Talmud, and the Talmudic and Cabalistic demonology is very complicated. Now one knows the position that blood always occupies in the operations of sorcery. In Chaldean magic it had a very great importance...Now, it is very probable, EVEN CERTAIN THAT JEWISH MAGICIANS SACRIFICED CHILDREN; hence the origin of the legend of ritual sacrifice.'"

A book entitled "The Jew, the Gypsy, and El Islam," indicates that the Talmudic god of the Jews [Not the God of Christians] is a blood loving god:

"The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood pleasing to the lord, viz: (1) that of Paschal holocaust [Easter sacrifice ‑‑ the Feast of Purim]; (2) that of circumcision."

According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. IV., p. 90, when performing the operation of circumcision on children, the mohel (Jewish Rabbi who does the circumcision):

"takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided."

Hatred of Christianity is a tradition among the Jews. One of the principle feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the Book of Esther of the Old Testament, the only Jewish book in the entire Bible.

The story, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamored with a Jewess, Esther a prostitute, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife. Haman, the King's minister, complained to him of the conduct of the Jews who, he said, did not keep the laws of the land, and obtained from the King an order to slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet.

There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman's ten sons, who were hanged.

This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day the Jewish bakers make cakes, laced with dried Christian blood, in the shape of human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called "Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism of the Jews in our midst.

When a Ritual Sacrifice occurs at Purim, it is usually that of an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood; the blood is then dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried blood of a Purim Sacrifice might sometimes be used for the following Passover.

When a Ritual Sacrifice is done at Passover, it is usually that of a Christian child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who is not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by wounding in the side in imitation of the murder of Christ. The blood taken from the child is then mixed either in the powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread.

Another festival at which Ritual Sacrifice has sometimes been indulged in is Chanucah (Which is called Hanukkah today) which occurs in December, commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem under the Maccabees in B.C. 165.

Although hate is the principal motive, superstitious traditions are also involved, one being the association of blood-sacrifices with the idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that Jewry cannot be saved unless every year the blood of a Christian is obtained for the purpose of ritual consumption.

The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, pp. 266-267, gives a list of Accusations of Ritual Murder (Sacrifices) made against the Jews through the centuries; 122 cases are listed in chronological order, and no less than 39 of them were made in the 19th century!

There were far more than double the number of Blood Accusations made in the 19th century than in any previous century, according to this authoritative Jewish list.

The list of Ritual Murder Accusations made by a converted Jew, Cesare Algranati, in 1913, and published in Cahiers Romains; there are listed 101 accusations, or which 28 were made in the 19th century and only 73 for all the eight preceding centuries! Even the Jew Roth gives the argument away, for he says:

"The nineteenth century proved little less credulous than those which proceeded it." ^[215]

The fact that the charges increase in number as the age becomes more and more enlightened is particularly significant, because the Jewish Money Power and its silencing activities are more developed than ever before and has been instrumental in reducing the number of charges by covering them up.

It is absolutely amazing that there are always influential Judeo-Christian men/women who can be induced, when Jewish interests are at stake, will declare to all the world that there is nothing improper in not attempting to examine these charges of Ritual Sacrifice by the Jews; and to declare them as lies by "Anti-Semitic" authors.

Yet the record is clear if one is inclined to study and learn. Following are few such examples:

"Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and devoured their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also in Cyprus, led by one of them named Artemion; and there another 240,000 were slain." ^[216]

The second:

���� "Baena (Cordoba Province): Ninety-one assassinations, mostly by shooting, hatchet blows, or strangling. Others were burned alive. Two nuns who had been dragged from the convent of the Mother of God, had their religious medals, with the figure of the Virgin, nailed into the sockets of their eyes. La Campana (Seville): Reds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde Caraballo, who either killed or was responsible for killing 11 persons in prison. The prisoners were fired on until they fell, covered with petrol, and set on fire. Some were still writhing in the flames when the city was entered.

���� Lore del Rio (Seville): 138 assassinated. They were dragged to the cemetery, lined up, and shot in the legs, being burned alive as they fell in a trench. When the town was entered hands could still be seen writhing above the ground." ^[217]

From the Magick, in Paris, France:

"...it was the theory of the ancient (Jewish) magicians that any living being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and health of the animal (non-Jews), and in quality according to its mental and moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape ...For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A (Christian) male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim." ^[218]

A footnote on p. 95 says:

"(4) It appears from the Magical Records of (the Jew) Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an average about 150 times every year between 1912 and 1928."

Even today the Jewish sects who keep the Passover by solar computation, indulge in these bloody sacrifices of Christians on that feast-day; an account is given of a visit to the scene of sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in this century, and these words were used:

"I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is withdrawn from the neck of the (Christian) lamb of sacrifice."

A paragraph from the B'nai B'rith Messenger, 1936:

"The sophisticated Pharisee (Jew) of the 20th century unceasingly gives thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients. The worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that which is not evident. Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard themselves a victimized by that person whose words or actions they do not understand. We love the obvious because it flatters us, and hate the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with faint praise. Riddles are irksome ^[219]. The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with facts for his fetish, the modernist is more foolish than his forebears. Decrying superstition, he is most superstitious; rejecting fancies, he is the fanciful product of a fictitious age. The modern world is bored with its own importance; life itself has become a botheration. Suffering from chronic ennui, how can a world ever become interested in anything but itself? Smothered in their self-complacency, these all-sufficient ones ask for facts. But what facts are there that fools can understand? How can the helpless superficial grasp the hopelessly profound, for are not realities reserved for the wise (Jews)?"

Although this paragraph is clothed in nonsense it is a picture of a Ritual Sacrifice, with the victim crucified. And is merely showing the contempt the Jew has for Christians because they cannot understand this type of wording.

Following in chronological order, where the death of the victim is perpetrated by the Jews; and in light of the show by Ophra Winfry in 1989 we can clearly see that there many cases of Ritual Sacrifice by Jews have been unsuspected and undiscovered up to today, 1995, and will continue for years to come.

�� 1144 A.D. Norwich: A twelve-year-old Christian boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree.

A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine; and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne, but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial. ^[220]

There is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual Murder and Sacrifice of St. William; the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the Poer of the Jewish Money has had it removed. No one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a Ritual Sacrifice. ^[221] The Jew, C. Roth stated, in reference to this case:

"Modern enquirers, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives." ^[222]

How these so-called enquirers arrived at a conclusion like that after all those years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that the wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of the side. John Foxe's Acts and Monuments of the Church records this Ritual Sacrifice, as did the Bollandists and other historians.

The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish Ritual Sacrifice; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew) it is made clear that his career, apart from this Ritual Sacrifice, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

�� 1160. Gloucester: The body of a Christian child named Harold was found in the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly dated 1168. ^[223]

�� 1171. Blois, France: At Passover, a Christian child was crucified, his body drained of blood and thrown into the river. ^[224]

�� 1179. Pontoise: A Christian boy named Richard was tortured, crucified and bled white. Philip Augustus's chaplains and historians, Rigord and Guillaume l'Armorician, attested this case. The body of the boy was taken to the Church of the Holy Innocents in Paris and he was canonized as St. Richard. ^[225]

�� 1180. Paris. (UJE) ^[226]

�� 1181. Bury St. Edmunds: A Christian child called Robert was sacrificed at Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there was supposed to cause 'miracles.' ^[227]; E. Bristol. (UJE)

�� 1192. Winchester: A Christian boy crucified. ^[228]

�� 1192. Braisne: Philip Augustus attended to this case personally, and had the criminals burnt. It was a case of the crucifixion of a Christian sold to the Jews by Agnes, Countess of Dreux, who considered him guilty of homicide and theft. ^[229]

�� 1199. G. Erfurt. (UJE)

�� 1232. Winchester: Christian boy crucified. ^[230]

�� 1232. E. Gloucester. (UJE)

�� 1235. Norwich: In this case, the Jews stole a Christian child and hid him with a view to crucifying him. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates (1847), says:

"They (the Jews) circumcise and attempt to crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000 marks." ^[231]

�� 1235. G. Wolfsheim and G. Fulda. (UJE)

�� 1238. Fulda, Hesse-Nassan: Five children murdered; Jews confessed under torture, but said the blood was wanted for healing purposes. Frederick II exonerated the Jews from suspicion, but the Crusaders had already dealt with a number by putting them to death.

Frederick II called together a number of converted Jews, who denied the existence of Jewish Ritual Sacrifice. But Frederick's bias is evident in his own words when, in publishing his decision, he gives his objects in calling these people together,

"although our conscience regarded the innocence of the aforesaid Jews adequately proved on the ground of several writings."

Had Frederick II lived today, he would have relied little upon religious literature in deciding whether Jewish Ritual Sacrifice exists or not. ^[232]

�� 1244. London: A Christian child's body found unburied in the cemetery of St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried in St. Paul's. ^[233]

�� 1247. Valreas, France: Just before Easter, a two-year-old Christian girl's body was found in the town moat with wounds on forehead, hands and feet.

Jews confessed that they wanted the blood of the child, but did not say that it was for ceremonial purposes. Pope Innocent IV said that three of the Jews were executed without confessing, but the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 261, says they confessed.

�� 1250. Saragossa: A Christian boy crucified, afterwards canonized as St. Dominiculus. Pius VII, 24th November 1805, confirmed a decree of the Congregation of Rites of 31st August, according this canonization.

�� 1255. Lincoln: A Christian boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy's mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Joppin or Copinus.

This Jew, promised by the judge his liufe if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime.

King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed. ^[234]

�� 1257. London: A Christian child sacrificed. ^[235]

�� 1261. Pforzheim, Baden: An old woman sold a seven-year-old Christian girl to the Jews, who bled her, strangled her and threw the body into the river. The old woman was convicted on the evidence of her own daughter. A number of Jews were condemned to death, two committing suicide. ^[236]

�� 1270. A.L. Weissenburg, a Christian child crucified. (UJE)

�� 1276. London: Christian boy crucified. ^[237]

�� 1279. Northampton: A Christian child crucified.

"They (the Jews) crucify a child at Northampton for which 50 are drawn at horses' tails and hanged." ^[238]

�� 1281-83. G. Mayence. A Christian child sacrificed. (UJE)

�� 1285. Munich. A Christian child crucified. (UJE)

�� 1286. Oberwesel, on the Rhine: A Christian boy named Werner was tortured for three days at Passover, hanged by the legs and bled white. The body was found in the river. A sculptured representation of this Ritual Sacrifice is still in the Oberwesel Church. ^[239]

�� 1286. G. Friesland. A Christian child murdered for his blood. (UJE)

�� 1287. Berne: Rudolf, a Christian boy, was murdered at Passover in the house of a rich Jew called Matler. Jews confessed that he had been crucified; many were put to death. ^[240]

A stone monument still exists in Berne commemorating the crime. It is called The Fountain of the Child-Devourer, and is now on the Kornhausplatz. It represents a monster, with a Jewish countenance, eating a child.

The figure wears the Judenbut, the hat prescribed for the Jews to wear by decree of the Fourth Lateran Council in 12 15. This monument was first placed in a street of the Jews' quarter as a reminder of the monstrous crime and as a punishment for the whole of Berne Jewry. Later, it was removed to its present location.

�� 1287. A. Salzburg, a Christian child crucified. (UJE)

�� 1288. Troyes, France: some Jews were tried for a Ritual Sacrifice and 13 were executed by burning. ^[241]

�� 1290. Oxford: The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, m. 21, 21st June, 1920, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.

Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration for the English.

Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been at work, for between 1910 and 1930, a notice was fixed above the shrine which reads as follows:

"The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and the existence of similar stores in England and elsewhere points to their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages and in the common superstition, now wholly discredited, and that ritual murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews against the hatred of the populace and against this particular accusation."

No one who studies the case history questions the historical facts in this case; but the Jews and their Judaised Christians unite in denying the fact of this Ritual Sacrifice.

�� 1288. F. Troyes, a Christian child murdered. (UJE)

�� 1290. A. Laibach, a Christian child sacrificed. (UJE)

�� 1292. A. Krems. (UJE)

�� 1294. Sw. Bern. (UJE)

�� 1302. G. Remken. (UJE)

�� 1303. G. Weissensee. (UJE)

�� 1305. Vienna and Prague. (UJE)

�� 1308. G. Thuringia. (UJE)

�� 1317. F. Chinon. (UJE)

�� 1331. G. Oberlingen. (UJE)

�� 1345. Munich. (UJE)

�� 1387. A.L. Strasbourg. (UJE)

�� 1401. G. Diessenhofen. (UJE)

�� 1407. P. Cracow. (UJE)

�� 1420. Vienna. (UJE)

�� 1428. G. Regensburg. (UJE)

�� 1430. Ravensburg, Oberlingen, and G. Lindau. (UJE)

�� 1435. Majorca, Sp. Palma. (UJE)

�� 1442. A. Lienz. (UJE)

�� 1453. F. Arles. (UJE)

�� 1462. Rinn, Innsbruck: A Christian boy called Andreas Oxner was bought by the Jews and sacrificed for his blood on a stone in the forest. The body was found by his mother in a birch-tree. No Jew was apprehended because, the border being near, they had fled when the crime was made known.

The Abbe Vacandard, defender of the Jews, says there was no trial. Well, of course there wasn't. Even in 1995 there is no trial for a crime where the criminals have escaped! The boy was sanctified by Pope Benedict XIV, in his Bull Beatus Andreas, Venice, 1778, which says he was

"cruelly assassinated by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ."

This last is admitted by Pope Clemet XIV, who wrote his report on the investigation he made into the matter of Jewish Ritual Sacrifices when, as Cardinal Ganganelli, he had been commissioned by Pope Benedict XIV to go into the matter; and in this report, he said:

"I admit the truth of another fact, which happened in the year 1462 in the village of Rinn, in the Diocese of Brixen, in the person of the Blessed Andreas, a boy barbarously murdered by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ."

No one questions the historical occurrence of this case. An engraving on wood representing the Ritual Sacrifice still exists in the church.

�� 1468. Sepulveda, Segovia, Spain: The Jews sacrificed a Christian child on a cross. The Bishop of Segovia investigated the crime, and ordered the culprits to Segovia, where they were executed. It is important to know that this Bishop was himself a son of a converted Jew; Jean d'Avila was his name. Colmenares's History of Segovia records the facts of the case, which was juridically decided by a man of Jewish blood. That may be the reason that one finds no mention of it in Strack's book in defence of the Jews, The Jew and Human Sacrifice.

�� 1470. G. Endingen. (UJE)

�� 1475. The Case of St. Simon of Trent: In 1475, a three-year-old Christian boy named Simon disappeared in the Italian town of Trent; the circumstances were such that suspicion fell upon the Jews. Hoping to avert this suspicion, they themselves "found" the child's body in a conduit where they afterwards confessed to having thrown it.

Examination of the body, however, revealed that the boy had not drowned; there were strange wounds on the body, of circumcision and crucifixion. About seven Jews were arrested; they were tortured and confessed that the boy had been Ritually Sacrificed for the purpose of obtaining Christian blood to mix with the ceremonial unleavened bread; these confessions were made separately and agreed in all essential details.

The Jews were tried and were ultimately executed. The officer in charge of the investigation of the crime, Jean de Salis de Brescia, had before him a converted Jew, Jean de Feltro, who described how his father told him that Jews of his town, Lanzhut, had killed a Christian child at Passover to get the blood of which they partook in wine and cakes.

�� 1480. Venice. (UJE)

�� 1490. Sp. Sa Guardia. (UJE)

�� 1494. Tyrnau, Hungary: A Christian boy was bled white and killed. The Jews culprits were betrayed by the confessions of women, who were persuaded to do so by the sight of some instruments of torture, which however were not applied to them. The Jews, arrested after this confession, themselves confessed that this was the fourth child they had killed for the blood, but they said they wanted this for medical purposes. ^[242]

�� 1494. H. Trnava (Tyrnau). (UJE)

�� 1504. G. Frankfort. (UJE)

�� 1505. B. Budweis. (UJE)

�� 1510. Brandenburg: Several Jews were accused in Berlin of buying a small Christian boy, bleeding him and killing him. They confessed, and 41 were executed. ^[243]

�� 1518. G. Geisingen. (UJE)

�� 1529. H. Bazin. (UJE)

�� 1536. H. Nagyszombat. (UJE)

�� 1540. G. Neuburg. (UJE)

�� 1545. Asia Minor, Amasia. (UJE)

�� 1553. It. Asti. (UJE)

�� 1554. Rome. (UJE)

�� 1564. P. Bielsk. (UJE)

�� 1570. G. Brandenburg. (UJE)

�� 1571. G. Hellerspring. (UJE)

�� 1593. G. Frankfort. (UJE)

�� 1598. P. Luck. (UJE)

�� 1623. Dalmatia Ragusa. (UJE)

�� 1636. P. Lublin. (UJE)

�� 1637. P. Cracow. (UJE)

�� 1639. P. Leezyea. (UJE)

�� 1650. A. Razinai. (UJE)

�� 1668. Vienna. (UJE)

�� 1670. Metz: As this was a very strongly established case, one does not find any mention of it in Strack's book in defence of the Jews. A three-year-old Christian boy was lost by his mother on the way to a well. The boy was wearing a red cap, and witnesses had seen him carried away by a Jew mounted on a horse.

This Jew was Raphael Levi. At first, the boy's body could not be traced. The Jews, becoming frightened, spread the report that wolves must have killed him in the forest. The forest was searched and eventually the head, neck and ribs of a boy were found, together with clothes which were identified as the missing boy's, red cap and all, by the boy's father.

But as these clothes were neither torn nor bloody, it was concluded that the wolf story was a "blind," and then witnesses came forward who had seen Raphael Levi with the boy in such places and at such times as to remove all doubt of his guilt. Levi was sentenced to death by the order of the parliament of Metz, and was burned alive. ^[244]

�� 1691. Vilna. (UJE)

�� 1696. Posen. (UJE)

�� 1698. Sandomir, Poland: The highest tribunal in the land, that of Lublin, condemned a Jew for Ritual Sacrifice, the local court having exculpated him. ^[245]; P. Zausmer and Kaidan. (UJE)

�� 1705. Italy, Viterbo. (UJE)

�� 1710. Rm. Neamtz. (UJE)

�� 1712. G. Frankfort. (UJE)

�� 1714. Rm. Roman. (UJE)

�� 1721. Danzig. (UJE)

�� 1736-40. Posen. (UJE)

�� 1743. P. Jaslau. (UJE)

�� 1745. G. Furth. (UJE)

�� 1748. Duniagrod, Poland: Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by Episcopal Court. ^[246]

�� 1753. Pavalochi, Poland: Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by Episcopal Court. ^[247]

�� 1753. Zhytomir, Poland: In this case, a three-year-old Christian boy was murdered; Jews were tried by the Episcopal Court of Kiev and condemned to death. A painting supposed to commemorate this murder is visited by pilgrims to the Carthusian Monastery at Kalwarya near Cracow. ^[248]

�� 1756. R. Jampol. (UJE)

�� 1764. H. Orcutta. (UJE)

�� 1783. Rm. Botoshani. (UJE)

�� 1791. H. Tasnad. (UJE)

�� 1797. Rm. Galatz. (UJE)

�� 1799. White Russia. (UJE)

�� 1801. Bucharest. (UJE)

�� 1803. Rm. Neamtz. (UJE)

�� 1811. Rm. Talowitza. (UJE)

�� 1816. Rm. Piatra and P. Grodno. (UJE)

�� 1823. Velisch, Russia: On Easter Sunday, a 2�-year-old Christian boy disappeared. His body was found in a marsh one week later; there were puncture wounds all over the body and the skin was scarified.

There were wounds of circumcision; the feet were bloody and a bandage had been tied around the legs. The body had been undressed, washed, and again dressed. No blood was found near the body, which was drained of blood.

Doctors gave evidence on oath that the child had been tortured to death. Some years later, five Jews were arrested together with three Russian women who had become Jewesses; these three women confessed that they had, one week before Passover in 1823, been made drunk by a Jewess who kept an inn and that the latter had bribed one of them to procure a boy.

One of these converted Jewesses described how the boy had been forcibly circumcised by the Jews and rolled about in a barrel until his skin was scraped all over. The boy had been taken to the school where a number of Jews were assembled, laid in a trough, and all present had made stabs with a nail in his side and temples. When the boy died under this torture, his body was taken to a wood by two of the converted Jewesses; and the third woman took a bottle of the blood of the boy to the Jewess innkeeper aforesaid.

Next day, the Rabbi's wife took the three women again to the school where the Jews were gathered; bottles were filled from the trough by means of a funnel, and the Rabbi dipped a nail into the blood and dropped a little on a number of pieces of cloth, one piece of which was given to everyone present.

The case went to the Imperial Council at St. Petersburg, all the lower courts which dealt with the case having found the Jews guilty. The Imperial Council reversed the verdict and, on 18th January, 1835, the three Russian Jewish convert women were sent to Siberia whilst all the Jews were acquitted of the crime. ^[249]

�� 1824. Rm. Bakau. (UJE)

�� 1829. P. Boleslaw. (UJE)

�� 1831. St. Petersburg: The Christian daughter of non-commissioned officer was the victim in this case. There were five judges, of whom four recognized the ritual character of the murder. The Jewish murderers were transported to Siberia. Monniot says the facts of this case were not contested.

�� 1834. C. Neuenhoven. (UJE)

�� 1837-47. Buffeto, Fiorenzola, Monticelli, and Cortemaggiore, Italy. (UJE)

�� 1840. Rhodes: On the eve of Purim a small Christian Greek boy was missed; he had been seen entering a house in the Jewish quarter; after that he was never seen again. It is interesting to note that the time of this event was the same as in the famous Damascus case. Yusuf Pasha, Governor of the island, took depositions of witness and sent to Constantinople for instructions as to what to do next. Meanwhile "at the instigation of the Greek clergy and the European consuls" ^[250] the Jewish quarter was blockaded and the leading Jews arrested. The Austrian Consul, however, supported the Jews, Austria being in need of loans from the Rothschilds.

But,

"owing to the efforts of Count Camondo, Cremieux and Montefiore" (to quote from the Jewish Encyclopedia) "a firman was obtained from the Sultan which declared all accusations of ritual murder null and void."

The Jews were released.

Camondo, Cremieux and Montefiore were all rich Jews. Cremieux and Montefiore also figured in the Damascus case. Count Camondo;

"exercised so great an influence over the sultans Abd-al-Majid and Abd-al-Aziz and over the Ottoman Grand Viziers and ministers that his name became proverbial. He was banker to the Ottoman Government..." ^[251]

There cannot be a shadow of doubt that the proceedings in this case were stopped by the force of the Jewish Money Power, in spite of the efforts of "the Greek clergy and the European consuls." ^[252]

�� 1840. The Damascus Case: This case, now almost completely forgotten by Christianity, convulsed Europe for a considerable time owing to the agitation induced by the Jewish Money Power which left no stone unturned to misrepresent and vilify the individuals responsible for bringing the Jews to justice.

Achille Laurent, a Member of the Societe Orientale, brought together the full details of the trial of the culprits as reported in Arab newspapers at the time, and he published the hole facts of the case ^[253], which was produced in France as a Yellow book in two volummes, in 1846.

The Jewish Festival of Purim fell on 15th February, 1840. Father Thomas, a Catholic monk, disappeared in Damascus on 5th February. His servant went to look for him and disappeared also. The French Consul, Comte Ratti-Menton, began to make enquiries, and got the Sherif Pasha to investigate. After a while seven Jews were arrested.

They confessed, some after receiving chastisement with the bastinado, to having murdered Father Thomas for the sake of his blood. Four of them were promised pardon if they would speak the truth; thee were Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, who became a Mahomedan, explaining that that was necessary before he could confess about the crimes of other Jews; Aslan Farkhi; Suliman, a barber; and Mourad el Fathal.

They confessed fully. Sixteen Jews were found to have been involved and all were arrested. Several of the Jews, including Mourad el Fathal, Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, Isaac Arari and Aaron Arari, described how the blood was required and collected from the cut throat of the victim to send to a Rabbi for use in preparing ceremonial bread (pains azymes).

�� 1840. G. Julich. (UJE)

�� 1843. T. Marmora. (UJE)

�� 1844. P. Tarnow and Stobikowaka. (UJE)

�� 1852-53. R. Saratov. (UJE)

�� 1859. Rm. Galatz. (UJE)

�� 1861. Rm. Chavlian. (UJE)

�� 1863. t. Smyrna. (UJE)

�� 1867. Rm. Galatz and Rm. Calrash. (UJE)

�� 1875. P. Ostrovo. (UJE)

�� 1879. R. Kutais. (UJE)

�� 1882. H. Tisza-eszlin. (UJE)

�� 1891. Xanten, Prussia: A five-year-old Christian boy called Hegmann was murdered, his throat cut and the body bloodless.

"The Government did all in its power to suppress the rumour"

of Ritual Sacrifice ^[254] The doctor who examined the boy said on June 29th that: "The trace of blood appears as an after-bleeding." And H. Nagyszokol.

�� 1892. F. Ingrandes, Rm. Bakau, Rm. Bakau and G. Eisleben. (UJE)

�� 1893. Prague. B. Kolin. (UJE)

�� 1894. Bulgaria. Tatar Pazardzhik. (UJE)

�� 1898. G. Skaisgirren. (UJE)

�� 1899. The Polna Case (Bohemia): Agnes Hruza, 19 years of age, was murdered March 29th, 1899. On April 1st, her body was found in a wood with the head nearly severed from the body. In spite this frightful wound, there was no blood about, although the body itself, of course, was almost bloodless.

A man called Peschak had seen a Jew Hilsner with two other Jews on the day of the murder on the spot where the body was found.

Hilsner was arrested and tried; another witness testified that he had seen the prisoner very agitated on March 29th, coming from the spot where the body was found. The court recognizing that Hilsner must have had accomplices, found him guilty and condemned him to death. He then confessed, and implicated two other Jews.

�� 1900. Konitz, West Prussia: A 19-year-old Christian youth, Ernst Witnter, was murdered in March. His body had been dismembered and parts of it were found in different localities. The culprits were never discovered, but two Jewish agents were sentenced to imprisonment for false witness and for the subornation of witnesses during the enquiry. ^[255]; and B. Nachod. (UJE)

�� 1903. R. Kishinev. (UJE)

�� 1911-13. Kiev, Russia: In 1911 a 13-year-old Christian boy's body was found at Kiev with curious wounds and drained of blood. A Jew named Beiliss was arrested on suspicion. It was proved that the murder took place inside the premises of a Jewish brick factor to which only Jews had access. This factory contained a Jewish hospice with a secret synagogue attached. After long-drawn-out preliminaries, Beiliss, who was proprietor of the factory, was tried; the jury found that there was no proof that he himself was the culprit, although half of them considered he was; the verdict therefore having to be unanimous, he was declared Not Guilty. But the jury agreed as to the cause of the boy's death; their verdict about this was as follows:

"The boy after being gaged, was wounded with a perforating instrument in the nape of the neck, temples and neck, which wounds severed the cerebral vein, the left temporal and jugular arteries, producing thus profuse hemorrhage; and afterwards, when Joutchinski (the boy's name) had lost about five glasses of blood, his body was pierced with the same instrument, lacerating thus the lungs, the liver, the right kidney and the heart, where the last wounds were inflicted, in all 47 wounds, causing acute suffering to the victim and the loss of practically all the blood of the body, and finally death."

�� 1924. Syria. Aleppo. (UJE)

�� 1926. P. Dobrzyn and R. Kanieff. (UJE)

�� 1928. Gladbeck, Germany: This occurred at the time of Purim; a twenty-year-old Christian lad called Helmuth Daube was found dead in front of his home, with his throat cut, his genital organs missing, whilst there were wounds on the hands and stabs in the abdomen.

There was no blood about where the body was found and it was bloodless. Experts said in Court that the throat showed the Jewish ritual cut.

The Jews set to work and eventually a young Gentile called Huszmann was accused of the murder, unnatural lust being alleged as a feature in the crime. The case was conducted against Huszmann by a Jew called Rosenbaum, and special police had been sent from Berlin to enquire about the circumstances; the President of the Police at Berlin was the Jew Bernhard Weiss.

These special police did what they could to convince the Court that it was a "lust-murder," but Huszmann was acquitted. The Bochumer Abendhlatt and Der Sturmer both gave their opinion that it was a Ritual Murder by Jews, and the latter paper was suppressed for a time, and its editor imprisoned. Y. Petrovo Selo and N.Y. Massena. (UJE)

�� 1929. G. Manau, Bamberg, Memel, Vilna and Greece. Salonika, Kovno. Lithuania. and others. (UJE)

�� 1930. R. Novosimera. (UJE)

�� 1936. Memel. (UJE)

�� 1937. G. Bamberg. (UJE)

�� 1940. B. Welhartitz. (UJE) ^[256]

We could go on and on with case after case for hundreds of pages, but we believe this should suffice to show that the Jews did and still do sacrifice Christian children for their ceremonies.

In other words, the Jews have a god which finds blood pleasing. In the words of Mr. Leese,

"What sort of a people is this whose god finds the blood obtained from� mutilation of human genital organs as 'pleasing?'"

Quoting from the Jewish writer Charles A. Weisman's Book Who is Esau-Edom?:

"During the Middle Ages Jews were found guilty of ritual murder of Christians in England; at Norwich in 1146, and Lincoln in 1225; in France at Blois in 1171; and in northern Italy at Trent in 1475. The Jewish Encyclopedia lists 121 Ritual Murder cases from 1146 to 1900, which were tried in courts. Many of the listings show convictions and the mode in which guilty Jews were executed." ^[257]

Continuing from Who is Esau-Edom?:

"From 1900 to 1939's there have been about another twenty cases of ritual murder by Jews. Even to this day there are reports of ritual murder of {Christian} children by certain extremist Hasidic Orthodox Jewish sects." ^[258]

Continuing from Who is Esau-Edom?:

"ABORTION HAS BECOME AN OVERT MEANS OF CHILD SACRIFICE WHICH JEWS HAVE INSTITUTED under their de facto law. A more covert means of {Christian} child sacrifice has been by their infamous 'ritual murders, which Jews have been accused through the ages.' In this practice 'the blood of the sacrificed gentile {Christian Child} is mixed with flour to make the unleavened bread eaten at Passover.'" ^[259]

Even though God commanded circumcision, there is no way a reading of Scripture shows that God intended that the procedure turn into a bloody ritual.

Besides that, it seems apparent that when Christ nailed the blood ordinances to the cross, he also nailed the circumcision to the cross.

"Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing." ^[260]

Make no mistake about it, THE GOD OF THE JEWS IS NOT THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, ISAAC AND JACOB/ISRAEL!!!

And if it were the same God ‑‑ the manner in which the Jews worship is administered is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord our God. According to Leese there are two specific periods of time for Ritual Murders by the Jews.

���� "The two principal feast days associated with Ritual Murder have been (1) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter� at Easter and the former about one month before it.

���� When a Ritual Murder occurred at Purim, it was usually that of an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood... the blood was dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried blood of a Purim murder might sometimes be used for the following Passover. When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually that of a [Christian] child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by wounding the side IN IMITATION OF THE MURDER OF CHRIST.

���� THE BLOOD TAKEN FROM THE CHILD WAS MIXED EITHER IN THE POWDERED STATE OR OTHERWISE INTO THE PASSOVER BREAD Then eaten - A type of Jewish Blood ritual was apparently still common even in 1903, as the Jewish Encyclopedia for that year, in discussing the method of performing a circumcision, states that the person performing the ritual: '...takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided.'" ^[261]

The Jewish circumcision rite requires that this mixture of the mohel's sputum, wine and blood from his mouth be mixed into a larger batch of wine. From this, all the Jewish guests drink and celebrate by singing and dancing] ^[262]

There is little doubt that the Jews and other historians who are possessed by the spirits of the Jews claim that the "Dark Ages" were from 493 A.D. to 711 A.D.

What they mean by the "Dark Ages" is that the Christian Church kept the Jews under control and countered their every move to put their Satanic battle plan into motion.

During the "Dark Ages" (the dark ages got its name from the Jews; because they were driven out of almost every country in Europe at the time, for their wickedness and ritual murders) they were countered by brave Christian souls like St. Bernard and others who led forces which confined them to their own ghettoes where they could not mix their blood with those of our Adamic people or killed them outright.

The main war of the "Jews" against the Adamites began in Russia when the Avars {Khazars}, a pre-Adamic, Esau-Edom, Japeth, Canaanite and several other races, invaded the country about the year 560.

The Avars would have completely overrun Europe and mixed their mongol seed with those of the Adamites had not been for the Adamic Slavs and their Allies. The Adamic Slavs drove the Avars back and then shored up the defenses in the Balkans with the allies the Bulgars.

About 700 A.D., the Khazars, after "converting" to Talmudism {Judaism} overwhelmed the Adamic Slavs in Russia while Mongols who had been won over to Islam also attacked Russia and Europe. The Mongols occupied Russia from 1241 to 1300 and only due to the persistence of the Slavs were the Mongols kept from completely over running all of Adamic Europe.

The first "conversions" of the Russians to Christianity is estimated to be in 867 A.D. and the full "conversion" of {White} Russia in the year 898 A.D. From that point on it was more or less a Christian millennium wherein all the nations of Europe kept the Luciferian-antichrist Jews under control for 900 years until the Illuminati and other secret societies the Jews had formed were able to make temporary gains through the French and other revolutions in Europe.

The Christian Adamic Tsars of Russia fought back and this started the first "Russian" invasion of America and Europe from 1800 to 1914 when 2-million Canaanite/Khazars invaded America and another 260,000 invaded England and Palestine.

The so-called "Russian" invasion of America that the televangelists and other so-called "Christian" preachers rant and rave about took place from 1800 to 1914 and then in 1917 the Jewish Khazar Luciferian terror was launched against the Adamic Russian people by the agents of Lucifer who were funded, transported and supported by the pseudo "Christian" government of America which had a satanic spirit cast over it and a blindness which drove it on to exterminate the Adamic ruling class of Russia.

"Who is blind, but my servant? or deaf, as my messenger that I sent? who is blind as he that is perfect, and blind as the Lord's servant? Seeing many things, but thou observest not opening the ears, but he heareth not." ^[263]

The United States has been built, ruled and governed by Satanic doctrines and secret societies almost from its very beginning when the Puritans were driven from England because of their opposition to the pro-Jewish revolutionary activities. These same pro-Jewish advocates also landed on our shores to begin undermining Christianity in America.

Satanic Freemasonry also was established before the Revolution and many of the "Christian" leaders such as George Washington, were Masons and even Benjamin Franklin was in league with the Mason and subversive forces in Europe which were "hell bent" on destroying the Christian monarchies of Europe and establishing "Democracy" {mobocracy} in America.

Franklin later came to his senses and wrote his famous letter attacking the assault of the Jews on America while still remaining a member of revolutionary and secret societies imported into the United States from the Jewish control "Democracies" of Europe.

The second and last "Russian" revolution in America has been taking place since 1965 and since that time over 1-million Jews from Russia have invaded America and another 700,000 have "invaded" Palestine.

Even as this is being written the Canaanite-Esau-Edomite-Khazars have the upper hand in Russia and Eastern Europe because of the unlimited financial and political backing they have from their co-religionists living in the United States, France and England. The "Russian" invasion of the Middle East and the United States is already taking place, now, not in the future.

The question is, whether it will be re-enforced by the Canaanites-Esau-Edom-Khazars in the Soviet Union and their Yeltsin's or will it be Crushed by the remaining Adamites in Eastern Europe, denying it the aid of the Jews and their spiritual allies in those countries? The "Revere" had this to say concerning Jewish persecutions of the Christians, The Long series of Jewish crimes begin with the crucifixion of Christ.

"ONE OF THE FINEST THINGS EVER DONE BY THE MOB WAS THE CRUCIFIXION OF CHRIST. Intellectually it was a splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle the job. If I'd had charge of executing Christ, I'd have handled it differently. You see, what I'd have done WAS HAD HIM SHIPPED TO ROME AND FED HIM TO THE LIONS. THEY COULD NEVER HAVE MADE A SAVIOR OUT OF MINCEMEAT!" ^[264]

In the 3rd century A.D. the Jews in Jerusalem perpetrated a number of massacres against Christians whom they used to kill under church lights. In 608 A.D. the Jews of Antioch attacked Christians and burned them in the streets including Bishop Anstas. In 614 A.D. the Jews, led by Benjamin of Tiberias, burned Christian churches and monasteries.

When Emperor Heraclius reconquered Palestine and brought the Jewish murder for investigation, he asked him why he had committed such atrocities against Christians, whereupon the latter repled, "Because they are enemies of my faith."

St. Justian, who was killed by the Jews in 615 A.D. said,

"The Jews were behind all the persecution of the Christians, they killed Christians whenever they could, and wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith."

St. Basil, who died in the fourth century, said,

"In the past, heathen and Jews used to fight, but now they both fight Christianity."

St. Clement warned the Christians of Corinth against the intrigues of Jews which caused the death of thousands of Christians.

Someone says that all Jews cannot be bad and the fact that Paul was a Jew prove it. Let us see what the Scriptures say about it. Paul tells us in Romans 11:1 that he was an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin. Yet we find him saying in Acts 22:3, "I am verily a man which am a Jew..."

Why did Paul say that? Because the Jews were beating him and would have liked to kill him. Acts 21:27-32, By saying that he was a Jew and one of them, Paul hoped they would desist and leave him alone.

He explains this further in 1 Corinthians 9:20, where he says, "And unto the Jews I BECAME AS A JEW." Note that he did not say "became a Jew" or "was a Jew" something entirely different. Paul says he became "as a Jew" so that he might GAIN the Jew.

Did Paul mean that he hoped to "gain the Jew" for Christ? Oh, No Paul knew the Jews were "contrary to all men" and that they were responsible for the death of Christ. He knew that it was impossible to make Christians of them.

Paul had only one reason for claiming to be "as a Jew" and that was to bring an end to their abuse of him, as his very life was in danger. Knowing that Jews always stick together, he felt that by claiming to be one of them they would not be so apt to kill him.

On page 66 of the book, "The True Sabbath," by Cottrell, are these words:

"According to the celebrated historian, Neander, the writings of the early fathers such as Origen, Polycarp, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Justin Martyr, Eusebius and others were so counterfeited and adulterated that no confidence can be placed in them."

Just who is this authority, Neander, whom certain religionists love to quote. For the answer, we turn to the book, "Waters Flowing Eastward" by I. Fray. On page 99 are these words,

"Neander, the founder of Spiritual Christianity, is a Jew."

It is obvious that his attacks on early Christians and their leaders is motivated by their statements concerning Jews of that day. The many sects, denominations, creeds, and what not of today owe their existence to the pernicious habit of spiritualizing or phantomizing the Scriptures. By so doing, the Bible can be made to say anything they want it to say.

Thus, we have constant bickering, proselyting and squabbling among the various groups and churches which make up our Christian community. All this confusion can be traced to one man, Neander. He was of the race John calls a generation of vipers. Jesus calls them vipers and sons of Satan and asks them how can they escape the damnation of hell.

John tells us they are deceivers and antichrist. Jude called them ungodly men, filthy dreamers, ordained of old to be condemned. Paul calls the Jew a children of the devil, enemy of all righteousness and contrary to all men. David says he hated them with a perfect hatred and asked that they be blotted out of the Book of Life. We are forewarned in Acts that some of these people would infiltrate our churches and seek to subvert us.

In Spain, Jews who feigned "conversion" to Christianity were known as Marranos. These were welcomed into the Christian community until it was discovered that their Christianity was all a sham. When Jewish holidays came around, these Marranos secretly observed the rituals in their homes as laid out by Judaism.

They had, in fact, never given up their Jewish practices but had joined Christian churches for, as the Bible says, purposes of subversion Revelation 2:9,

"...know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews {Judeans}, and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan."

Revelation 3:9,

"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews {Judeans} and are not but do lie."

As we pursue our study of this mysterious people comprising the "synagogue of Satan," it may be helpful to consider the opinions of prominent historical persons to aid us in properly evaluating them. Mr. A.H. Ramsey, in his book, "The Nameless War," records these following statement:

Seneca 4 B.C.

"The customs of this accursed people have grown so strong that they have spread through every land."

St. Justin 116 A.D.,

"The Jews were behind all the persecution of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith."

Mohammed 570 A.D.

"It is incomprehensible to me why one has not long ago expelled these death-breathing beasts...are these Jews anything else but devourers of men?"

Martin Luther 1483 A.D.

"How the Jews love the book of Esther, which is so suitable to their bloodthirsty, revengeful, murderous appetite and hope. The sun has never shown on such a bloodthirsty and vindictive people who cherish the idea of murdering and strangling the heathen. No other men under the sun are more greedy than they have been and always will be as one can see from their accursed usury. They console themselves that when their Messiah come, he will collect all the gold and silver in the world and divide it among them."

Voltaire, 1694,

"The Jews are nothing but an ignorant and barbaric people, which for a long time combined the most loathsome avarice with the most abominable superstition and inextinguishable hatred of all peoples by whom they are tolerated and through whom they are enriched."

Napoleon,

"I decided to improve the Jews; but I do not want any more of them in my kingdom; indeed I have done all to prove my scorn of the vilest nation in the world."

Benjamin Franklin, 1789,

���� "There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen, in every land which the Jews have settled they have depressed the normal level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated. They have created a state within a state, and when they are opposed, they attempt to strangle the national financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

���� For more than 1799 years they have lamented their sorrowful fate - namely that they were driven out of the motherland. Gentlemen, if the civilized world should give them back Palestine and their property, they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires, they cannot live among themselves; they must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race. ^[265]

���� If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than two hundred years, they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed our lives, personal property and freedom.

���� If the Jews are not excluded within two hundred years, our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews while they remain in the counting houses gleefully rubbing their hands. I warn you Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children's children will curse you in your graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans, even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The Leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil our institutions - THEY SHOULD BE EXCLUDED BY THE CONSTITUTION."

How deadly accurate Benjamin Franklin's words are as we see the creeping paralysis of Jewish communism undermining American traditions, changing our laws and corrupting our institutions.

According to the King James Charter, the Mayflower Compact and several Supreme Court decisions, this country is a Christian Nation, yet we permit as appointees, bureaucrats, department heads and advisors, hordes of antichristians who have swarmed into government service and are busily enforcing their unamerican ideologies on our national way of life.

We have now examined these people in light of the facts derived from historical records as well as the Holy Writ. Let us now call upon science for confirmation of the fact that Jews are not as other people.

The Scientific American for March 1957 recorded the results of a study conducted by Stephen P. and Leslie C. Dunn of the inhabitants of the Jewish Ghetto of Rome where, for more than 2000 years, they have been more or less segregated from the rest of the city. Comprehensive blood tests of this group, which has been genetically isolated in the midst of the metropolis, reveals the following startling facts:

�� 1). The blood of the Jewish community of Rome discloses��������� a mysterious RH gene which is not present in White����������� Christians.

�� 2). Blood typing laboratories are puzzled by the unusual����������� serological reaction it produces.

�� 3). It is difficult to decide whether the blood is RH����������������� positive or RH negative.

�� 4). The Ghetto population shows definite biological����������������� differences from Roman Christians.

�� 5). Tests are now being conducted in Israel on Jews from���������� all parts of the world in an attempt to find the cause������������ for these differences.

We have news for them. If they want to know the cause of these differences, they need only read John 8:44 and find out who their father is. Obviously, the blood of the "children of the devil" will be different from that of the Christians.

A report from Copenhagen, Denmark, written by John Hilliby of the New York Times, a fingerprint study by two Jewish scientists.

The researchers are Dr. Leo Sachs of the Weizman Institute in Israel and Dr. M. Bat-Miriam of the Israeli Institute for Biological Research.

Following are excerpts from that Dispatch:

"The problem, Dr Sachs said, was to decide how widely scattered members of the race could be subjected to the same physical tests. He chose fingerprinting because the characteristic pattern of loops, whorls and arches was not subjected to what evolutionists call selective forces; that is, they are not adaptable. They also gave statistically valid evidence of hereditary similarities in otherwise widely different populations."

By examining all ten fingerprints of each of 4,000 Jews now resident in Israel, but who originally lived in Poland, Germany, Iraq, Egypt, Morocco, Yemen, Bulgaria and Turkey, Doctors Sachs and Bat-Miriam considered that they had got 40,000 characteristic "dabs" of the many migration streams.

"The frequency of the relationship of the loops, whorls and arches of the prints to one another gave the researchers a series of numerical factors that, when compared with the samples of non-Jews, SHOWED THAT THERE WERE UNIQUE QUALITIES IN THE JEWISH PRINTS..."

There was, Dr. Sachs said, an unmistakable "Mediterranean component" in the eight population samples studied, and its character was UNLIKE THE PRINTS OF NON-JEWISH PEOPLE AMONG WHOM THE JEWS HAD BEEN LIVING OFTEN FOR CENTURIES!

The Bible record designating these people as a serpent Race and different from their Christian neighbors is upheld and corroborated historically and scientifically. It seems like a miracle and almost unbelievable, but the facts speak for themselves, and we Christians can be great comforted in the fact that the Book of Books is once more vindicated and proven true. The B'nai B'rith Messenger on June 17, 1955, carried the following message on page 26:

"There must be rewriting of the Christ story for Christians which will for all time eradicate the myth that the Jews killed Christ."

We, Christians, can assure these people that the Christ story is already written. It is called the Holy Bible. We Christians will fight to the death to defend it.

We hear a great deal these days about the "brotherhood of man." There is an organization of Christians and Jews which promulgate this theory.

In associating themselves with Jews, the Christians are indirectly promoting atheism, for to advocate brotherhood without Christ is to advocate atheism. If a Jew can be brother to a Christian without accepting Christ, it means that God can be his father without accepting Christ.

If access to God without Christ is possible then Christ is unnecessary. If we believe that Christ is unnecessary, then we are atheists.

It is deplorable that Christian dupes cannot see through this devilish scheme. The union of Christians with the seed of the serpent, the synagogue of Satan, is an abomination in the sight of God. Some ask,

"If the brotherhood of Man is unscriptural, why does the Bible say we are all of one blood as in Acts 17:26?"

People who quote this verse know, or should know, that the word "blood" does not occur in the original and is omitted from the authorized version. Also the neuter gender is used. If man was meant, it would have been in the masculine gender. The text should be rendered "and hath made of one species all nations of men to dwell..." Homo Sapiens.

The same way we refer to the dogs belonging to the canine species. The Jews, as we know, are not included or referred to in this text, as they come under a different classification, the Serpent Race, and are contrary to all men.

Jewish author Maurice Samuel, in his Book, "You Gentiles," page 155 says:

"We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will destroy because we need a world of our own."

The "Jewish World" of Feb. 9, 1883, stated:

"The great ideal of Judaism is that the whole world shall be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a Universal Brotherhood of Nations ‑‑ a greater Judaism, in fact ‑‑ ALL THE SEPARATE RACES and RELIGIONS SHALL DISAPPEAR." ^[266]

At this point it is well for us to be reminded of the following excerpt from a report delivered by Mr. Oudendyke, Netherlands Minister at Petrograd, Russia, on Sept. 6, 1918, concerning the situation in Russia. At that time the Netherlands Minister was acting for the British Ambassador and the report was presented to parliament in London.

���� "The foregoing report will indicate the extremely critical nature of the present situation. The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other governments to the fact that if an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once, the civilization of the world will be threatened.

���� This is not an exaggeration, but a sober matter of fact; and the most unusual action of German and Austrian consuls-general, before referred to, in joining in protest of Neutral legations appears to indicate that the danger is also being realized in German and Austrian quarters. I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one farm or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by the Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.

���� The only manner in which this danger could be averted would be the collective action on the part of all powers. I am also of the opinion that no support whatever should be given to any other socialistic party in Russia, least of all to social revolutionaries, whose policy is at the moment to overthrow the Bolsheviks, but whose aims in reality are the same, visavis, to establish proletariat rule throughout the world. Social revolutionaries will never right nay foreign power, and any profession which they may now make in this sense is merely a tactical move in their struggle with the Bolsheviks."

In the confrontation between the Arabs and the Jews, President Nixon has bluntly informed the American people that we are deeply committed to the Jews.

In California and across the nation, tens of thousands of our youth are being brain-washed into taking the mind-destroying drug LSD; and many of these young people are committing suicide, attempting to gouge out their eyes or otherwise maim themselves.

It has been shown that LSD IS MANUFACTURED IN ISRAEL AND SMUGGLED INTO THIS COUNTRY. So why should we be deeply committed to the protection of our worst enemy, an enemy that is not so-secretly destroying us with biochemical warfare?

As the result of the study of excerpts from the Talmud, evidence from the Bible, statements from noted non-Jews throughout history, statements from Jews themselves and their leaders, and finally evidence developed by their own scientists in the field of Biology, we are justified in arriving at the following conclusion, namely:

�� 1). That the Jews in their capacity of being "contrary to all�������� men" are in a� category not commonly associated with��������� the Biblical concept of the family of man.

�� 2). Christians, by virtue of their acceptance of the sacrifice�������� our Lord Jesus Christ made on the stake, are assured���������� of eternal life. The Jews, being of their "father, the�������������� devil," have no such assurance, hence their only concern�������� is with enjoying the "good life" which they now have.

�� 3). That the Jews have a deep and undying hatred of��������������� Christians and Christianity in general.

Note the hate programs of TV against the Christian people of Germany. It is unceasing and unrelenting. Indeed, it was the Jewish hatred of Christian Germany which brought World War II.

Samuel Untermeyer, president of the World Jewish Economic Federation, upon returning from a world wide meeting of Jews in Amsterdam, Holland, made a speech on radio station WABC, Columbia Broadcasting system in N.Y.C. on Aug. 6, 1933, in which he said the Jews of the world had declared war on Germany and would starve them to death. That was six years BEFORE any Jew had been punished and before military war was initiated in 1939.

The founder of the Irgun terrorist organization, Vladimer Jabotinsky, Jewish Communist who wrote in the January issue of Natcha Retch, 1934:

"The fight against Germany has been carried on for months by every Jewish community, conference, congress, trade organization, by every Jew in the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle will be of general value. We shall let loose a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany's ambition to become a great nation again, to reconquer her lost territories and colonies. Our Jewish interests on the other hand, demand the complete destruction of Germany. The German nation is collectively and individually a danger to us Jews."

Rabbi M. Perizweig, head of the British section of the World Jewish Congress, speaking in Canada, stated:

"The World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years." ^[267]

In Walter Winchell's column in the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner on Dec. 7, 1966, appeared these words:

"Merchants report a boycott of German goods in the U.S."

������������������������������������� -------------

"The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism." ^[268]

������������������������������������� -------------

���� "Some call it Marxism ‑‑ I call it Judaism." ^[269]

������������������������������������� -------------

"Whenever an American or a Filipino fell at Bataan or Corregidor or at any other of the now historic spots where MacArthur's men put up their remarkable fight, their survivors could have said with truth: 'The real reason that boy went to his death, was because Hitler's anti‑semitic movement succeeded in Germany.'" ^[270]

������������������������������������� -------------

"Kill the Germans, wherever you find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on women, children, or the aged! Kill every German ‑‑ wipe them out!" ^[271]

������������������������������������� -------------

"We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people." ^[272]

������������������������������������� -------------

"The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end." ^[273]

���� "All Jews world wide ‑‑ declared war on the Third Reich." ^[274]

"World War II was a Zionist plot to make way for the foundation of the Jewish State in Palestine." ^[275]

������������������������������������� -------------

"Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child." ^[276]

������������������������������������� -------------

"Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced into it, not this year but later..." ^[277]

������������������������������������� -------------

"Even if we Jews are not bodily with you in the trenches, we are nevertheless morally with you. This is OUR WAR, and you are fighting it for us." ^[278]

������������������������������������� -------------

"Our fight against Germany must be carried to the limit of what is possible. Israel has been attacked. Let us, therefore, defend Israel! Against the awakened Germany, we put an awakened Israel. And the world will defend us." ^[279]

������������������������������������� -------------

"Israel won the war [WW I]; we made it; we thrived on it; we profited from it. IT WAS OUR SUPREME REVENGE ON CHRISTIANITY." ^[280]

������������������������������������� -------------

"The greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government." ^[281]

�������������������������������������� ------------

"In death as in life, I defy the Jews who caused this last war [WW II], and I defy the powers of darkness which they represent. I am proud to die for my ideals, and I am sorry for the sons of Britain who have died without knowing why." ^[282]

������������������������������������� -------------

���� "Judea declares War on Germany." ^[283]

������������������������������������� -------------

"Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened there during the 30‑year War." ^[284]

"The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany..." ^[285]

������������������������������������� -------------

"The pressure for war is mounting. The people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems hell‑bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country are behind war." ^[286]

�������������������������������������� ------------

"We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence on our press, radio, and motion pictures. It may become very serious. (Fulton) Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual System if a certain feature was permitted to go on the air. The threat was powerful enough to have the feature removed." ^[287]

������������������������������������� -------------

"The Gulag Archipelago, 'he informed an incredulous world that the blood‑maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty‑six million victims in Russia from 1918 to 1957! Solzhenitsyn cited Cheka Order No. 10, issued on January 8, 1921: 'To intensify the repression of the bourgeoisie.'" ^[288]

Despite the fact that Germany and the United States has contributed billions of dollars to keep the economy of Israel alive, there is no gratitude in the breast of the Jews.

�� 4). That upon their heads has come,

"all the righteous blood shed upon the earth from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar." ^[289]

��������������������������������� Chapter Seven

��������������������� PROOF THAT AMERICA

������������������ IS A CONQUERED NATION

Date of Surrender: 1930 Ratified by Congress: 1933

�� Terms: The Geneva Law which established a National���������������� Bankruptcy Contract under "Silent Judicial Notice" to������������ include all {corporate} U.S. citizens in a fraudulent�� �����������Social Security scheme previously declared illegal���������������� under the positive law of nations.

The First Act of Surrender Passage of H.J. Res. 192 which removed the U.S.A. from the Gold Standard and made it impossible for the Nation to "pay" its debts. Setup a Credit Commune with "limited liability."

�� 1). TRIBUTE: Taxation without Representation exacted by {corporate} U.S. officials as an extortion payment to the Federal Reserve {a private [Jewish controlled] banking syndicate} and other agencies of the United Nations - front organization for the World's Ruling Elite.

�� 2). EXPATRIATION OF JOBS AND INDUSTRIES: Utilization of taxpayer supported agencies such as OPIC and AID to export American resources overseas.

�� 3). DESTRUCTION OF STATE AND NATIONAL BOUNDARIES: Regionalization of 30 of the 50 states by removing boundary descriptions from the State Constitutions. The signing of International Trade Agreements such as GATT {General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs} and NAFTA {North American Free Trade Agreement} to destroy "non-tariff trade barriers" and create an economic merger among Pan American countries.

�� 4). PROMOTION OF CRIME AND SLAVE LABOR THROUGH ALIEN IMMIGRATION: A Welfare State Immigration policy that attracts non-contributing undesirables to destroy the Standard of Living and provide a future inducement toward communist revolution and slavery for all citizens.

�� 5). DISPOSITION OF THE SPOILS OF WAR: Systematic looting of the Nation's wealth by {Jewish controlled} International Corporate pirates and {Jewish controlled} banking privateers under Admiralty's "Questions of Prize." Privatization of the Nation's infrastructure through sale of Public Assets to foreign principals was established by Presidential Executive Order No. 1203 (1992).

�� 6). SIEGE MENTALITY IN A POLICE STATE: Pillaging of U.S. citizens through Draconian federal forfeiture laws that violate their civil and constitutional rights on the pretext of a phony "Drug War." Bankruptcy and Emergency Powers such as the International Economic Emergencies Act, Title 50 USC 1701-1706, are used improperly by U.N. sponsored government operatives to justify military "hits" upon political dissenters whom are arbitrarily labeled as enemies of the "New World Order." (i.e., Randy Weaver, David Koresh, Ralph Daigle, Gordon Kahl and many others).

�� 7). DISAVOWAL OF THE LOYALTY OATH AND TREASON: Secretary of the Treasury is an employee of the International Monetary Fund (IMF, an independent foreign corporation) and,

"Receiver in the National Bankruptcy ^[290] U.S. District Court Judges are immune from civil torts and are members of an 'independent judiciary' paid by the {foreign} IMF-controlled Treasury Department. The Civil Service Commission suspended the loyalty oath ^[291] for its federal employees and many agencies have transferred allegiance to the U.N. through 'Service Agreements' and 'Memorandums of Understandings' (MOUs). The U.S. Marshall's' Oath to the Constitution under 28 USC 563 was deleted ^[292] and subverted to INTERPOL, et ed., by U.N. mandate 22 USC 263(A)."

These wholesale repudiations of governmental accountability to the people under Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution should be construed as a hostile takeover and Act of War.

�� 8). SUBVERSION OF THE CONSTITUTION BY INTERNATIONAL TREATY: Passage by Congress of unlawful (i.e., under Color of Law) legislation designed to overturn the Constitution. The following list contains highlights from U.S. legislative History:

�� a). The Federal Reserve Act 1913 - abrogated Article 1,����������� Sec. 8, clause 5 and 6.

�� b). H.J. Res. 192 (1933) - suspended the Gold Standard������������ and Gold Clause.

�� c). Coinage Act of 1956 - Debased the specie coin (Article�������� 1, Sec. 10, clause)

�� d). P.L. 94-564 (1971) - removed convertabilty of U.S.�������������� dollar into gold.

�� e). Declaration of INTERdependence (1976) - nullified������������ national spirit and purpose.

�� f). P.L. 95-147 (1977) - declared insolvency.

�� h). U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1992) -����������� set aside the Bill of Rights.

�� i). P.L. 102-14 (1991) - which allows the execution of��������������� Christians in America.

�� 9). UNILATERAL DISARMAMENT: The creation of an Arms Control and Disarmament Agency under P.L. 87-297 and described in State Department Paper 7727, along with the non-incorporation of the 2nd Amendment into the 14th Amendment protections against the states, indicates that our {their} criminal government will eventually declare martial law so that they can launch a "military enforcement action" to confiscate firearms from all law abiding citizens.

���������������������������������� Chapter Eight

���������������������� Public Law 102‑14 and

������� Its Implications To Christian Americans

�� 105 STAT. 44 Public Law 102‑14 March 20, 1991 Joint Resolution To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A."

�� Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

�� Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

�� Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning chaos;

�� Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;

�� Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;

�� Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson ^[293], leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty‑ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;

�� Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe," this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving," the year in which we turn to education charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and

�� Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it

�� Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the world‑wide Lubavitch Movement, is designated as "Education Day, U.S.A." The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. ^[294]

It is apparent that the "Seven Noahide Laws" are the real purpose of the Resolution and Public Law 102‑14. The Seven Noahide Laws themselves were not included in the Resolution nor in the Law itself, AND FOR GOOD REASON.

Since they are not commonly known to the average citizen, we should endeavor to learn what they are; and more about the so‑called "Rebbe" Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the leader of the Lubavitch Movement; and what effect, if any, these laws will have upon Christian Americans in general. Particularly now that we have a NEW "law of the land."

They are not easy to find, but some encyclopedias mention them briefly. NOAHIDE LAWS, also called NOACHIAN LAWS, A Jewish Talmudic designation for seven [so‑called] biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently on all mankind [THERE IS NO BIBLICAL PROOF FOR THIS STATEMENT].

Beginning with Genesis 2:16, the Babylonian Talmud [supposedly] listed the first six commandments as prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, and robbery and the positive command TO ESTABLISH COURTS OF JUSTICE (with all that this implies).

After the flood a seventh commandment given to Noah, forbade the eating of flesh cut from a living animal ^[295].

Though the number of laws was later increased to 30 with the addition of prohibitions against castration, sorcery, and other practices, the 'seven laws,' with minor variations, retained their original status as authoritative commandments and as the source of other laws.

As basic statutes safe‑guarding monotheism and guaranteeing proper ethical conduct in society, THESE LAWS PROVIDED A LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ALIEN RESIDENTS IN JEWISH TERRITORY [When did the United States become Jewish territory?].

Maimonides thus regarded anyone who observed these laws as one 'assured of a portion in the world to come.' throughout the ages scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity [Which is totally false.

Judaism and Christianity are total opposites and are deadly enemies], as universal norms of ethical conduct, AS A BASIC CONCEPT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all.

The following is a summary of the Seven Noahide Laws from Institute of Judaic-Christian Researcher, Jan. 1992; The Talmud, Sanh. 56a-59b; Yad Melakhim 8:10, 9, 10.

�� 1). Thou shalt not engage in idol worship.

�� 2). Thou shalt not blaspheme God.

�� 3). Thou shalt not shed innocent blood of any human nor��������� fetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to live.

�� 4). Thou shalt not engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous�������� or homosexual relations nor commit the act of rape.

�� 5). Thou shalt not steal.

�� 6). Thou shalt ESTABLISH LAWS AND COURTS OF������������� LAW TO ADMINISTER [enforce] THESE LAWS,��������������� INCLUDING THE DEATH PENALTY.

�� 7). Thou shalt not be cruel to animals.

As we make a cursory examination of the "Seven Noahide Laws" one would see nothing objectionable. In fact, one would applaud any effort to remove the evil from among us; because that is what the Laws, Statutes and Judgments of God directs us to do. But there is more, much more, to these laws than first meets the eye!

The Jews say these "Seven Laws of Noah" known as the "Noahide Laws" or "Noachian Laws," (actually there are only six laws with one provision for enforcement which makes up the "Seven Noahide Laws").

So, how does the resolution passed by Congress relate to these laws? The United States is considered by many Jews as "THEIR" stronghold and "THEIR" headquarters for eventual world domination. In a recent article published in "Wellsprings" the head rabbi of Hasidic Jewry stated:

"...America has become the focus and fountainhead of Jewish survival. Providence has prepared a new home for Torah and Yiddishkeit in this country...The largest concentration of our best elements are in America. We must lead the smaller Jewish communities in other countries and continents, even in Erety Israel [Israel-Palestine], which must learn heavily on American support for its economic and spiritual survival."

The "Seven Laws of Noah," according to Hasidic Jews, SHOULD BE ENFORCED UPON ALL NON‑JEWS [this means the Blacks, Mexicans, Chinese, Japanese, Arabs, and etc., as well as Christians] BY THE JEWS THEMSELVES:

"...the entire context of the Talmudic discussion of the Noachide Laws is that of actual ENFORCEMENT BY RABBINIC COURTS."

The Jews say these laws were given to Noah by their god for the orderly government of all people, BUT JEWS WERE GIVEN ANOTHER SET OF LAWS at Mount Sinai much later, SO THEY ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE NOAHIDE LAWS but rather to the later ones, except, of course, for those Noahide Laws that were repeated at Sinai.

Also the Jews WOULD NOT PAY THE SAME PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THESE LAWS. The Jewish Encyclopedia, page 649 states:

"In the case of murder, if the Noachide slay a child in its mother's womb, or kill a person whose life is despaired of ('terefah'), or if he cause the death of a person by starving him or putting him before a lion so that he can not escape, or if he slay a man in self‑defense, THE NOACHIDE IS GUILTY OF MURDER AND MUST PAY THE DEATH PENALTY, ALTHOUGH UNDER THE SAME CIRCUMSTANCES AN ISRAELITE [Jew] WOULD NOT BE EXECUTED."

According to the Encyclopedia Judaica the death penalty would be: "...violation of any one of the seven laws SUBJECTS THE NOACHIDE TO CAPITAL PUNISHMENT BY DECAPITATION."

Notice Congress and the President are giving acclamation to a Talmudic Jewish Rabbi called "the rebbe." Menachem Mendel Schneerson, whom the "Current Biography Yearbook 1983" states on page 355:

���� "[Born] April 18, 1902 [Not March 26 as stated in Public Law 102‑14]; leader of Habad (Lubavitch) Hasidim...' As Rebbe, or spiritual head, of the Lubavitch Hasidim, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson is one of the most important figures in American and world Jewry...Hasid and the hasidic community from his own all‑pervasive radiance, attained through his mystic union with God.

���� This union and the ensuing enrichment of his soul are used for the sake of the people, TO LEAD THEM LOVINGLY TO THEIR CREATOR. The zaddik IS A MYSTIC who employs his power within the social community and for its sake. A wonder‑healer and miracle‑worker, in the eyes of his followers HE IS A COMBINATION OF CONFESSOR, MORAL INSTRUCTOR, AND PRACTICAL ADVISER. Also a theoretical teacher and exegetical preacher, with a style of preaching peculiar to zaddikim, he expounds his hasidic torah (Hebrew for the teaching of the zaddimim) at his table (in hasidic parance der tish) surrounded by his followers, generally during the third meal on the Sabbath (se'ndah shelishit). For the individual Hasid, joining the court of his zaddik is both a pilgrimage and a revitalizing unification with the brotherhood gathered at the court, united around and through the zaddik.������

���� The Hasid journeyed to his zaddik's court at least for the High Holidays (although this practice later weakened) to seek his blessing, which was also entreated from afar. He submitted a written account of his problems (known as a kvitl), usually accompanying this with A MONETARY CONTRIBUTION (pidyon, short FOR pidyon nefesh, 'REDEMPTION OF THE SOUL')...

���� BASIC IDEAS OF HASIDISM: Creator and Universe. While it is true that many of the basic ideas of Hasidism are grounded in earlier Jewish sources, the Hasidim did produce much that was new if only by emphasis. With few exceptions, hasidic ideas are not presented systematically in the hasidic writings, but an examination of these writings reveals certain patterns common to all the hasidic masters.

���� Central to hasidic thought is an elaboration of the idea found in the Lurianic Kabbalah, THAT GOD 'WITHDREW FROM HIMSELF INTO HIMSELF' IN ORDER TO LEAVE THE PRIMORDIAL 'EMPTY SPACE' INTO WHICH THE FINITE WORLD COULD EVENTUALLY EMERGE AFTER A LONG PROCESS OF EMANATIONS.

���� The redemption of the 'holy sparks' was one of the rea�sons given for hasidic fondness for tobacco. SMOKING A PIPE SERVED TO RELEASE SUBTLE 'SPARKS' NOT OTHERWISE ACCESSIBLE.

���� JEWISH ZADDIK SAID TO BRING JEWS CLOSER TO THEIR GOD!: Kavannah and Zaddikism. Is this program of sustained contemplation, attachment, and utter devotion to God really possible for all men? The hasidic answer is generally in the negative. This is why the doctrine of zaddikism is so important for Hasidism. The holy man, his thoughts constantly on God, raises the prayers of his followers and all their other thoughts and actions. In the comprehensive work on zaddikism, R. Elimelech of Lyzhansk's No'am Elimelekh, the zaddik appears as a spiritual superman, with the power to work miracles.

���� HE IS THE CHANNEL THROUGH WHICH THE DIVINE GRACE FLOWS, THE MAN TO WHOM GOD HAS GIVEN CONTROL OF THE UNIVERSE BY HIS PRAYERS. THE ZADDIK PERFORMS A DOUBLE TASK: HE BRINGS MAN NEARER TO GOD AND HE BRINGS DOWN GOD'S BOUNTY TO MAN. ^[296] The zaddik must be supported by his followers. This financial assistance is not for the sake of the zaddik but for the sake of those privileged to help him. By supporting the zaddik with their worldly goods his followers become attached to him through his dependence on them, which he readily accepts in his love for them.

���� JEWISH ZADDIK HAS POWER OVER LIFE AND DEATH: Their welfare thus becomes his and his prayers on their behalf can the more readily be answered. THE ZADDIK EVEN HAS POWERS OVER LIFE AND DEATH. GOD MAY HAVE DECREED THAT A PERSON SHOULD DIE BUT THE PRAYERS OF THE ZADDIK CAN NULLIFY THIS DECREE. THIS IS BECAUSE THE ZADDIK'S SOUL IS SO PURE AND ELEVATED THAT IT CAN REACH TO THOSE WORLDS IN WHICH NO DECREE HAS BEEN PROMULGATED SINCE THERE ONLY MERCY REIGNS. But if such powers were evidently denied to the great ones of the past how does the Zaddik come to have them? The rationale is contained in the parable attributed to the Maggid of Mezhirech ^[297]

���� Rabbi Michael Katz, a well known student of the Talmud, states that it is the considered opinion of acclaimed TALMUDIC SCHOLARS that there are actually thirty commandments that are Noadic and apply to all non‑Jewish people but that ONLY THE 'SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS' ARE PUNISHABLE BY EXECUTION OF CHRISTIANS BY JEWS THROUGH JEWISH 'NOAHIDE' COURTS!

���� The Talmud says that the first six of these precepts were given originally by God to Adam, and the seventh afterward to Noah. These precepts were designed to be obligatory on all the Noachide, OR DESCENDANTS OF NOAH, AND CONSEQUENTLY, FROM THE TIME OF MOSES, THE JEWS WOULD NOT SUFFER A STRANGER TO LIVE AMONG THEM UNLESS HE OBSERVED THESE PRECEPTS, AND NEVER GAVE QUARTER IN BATTLE TO AN ENEMY WHO WAS IGNORANT OF THEM."

Now we turn once again to The Jewish Encyclopedia: HADAD:

"NAME OF AN Arama�ic...EDOMITISH, DEITY..."

The following is taken from the 1971 edition of The Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. XII, pp. 1189‑1191;

���� "NOACHIDE LAWS, the seven laws considered by rabbinic tradition as the minimal moral duties enjoined by the Bible on all men ^[298]...The seven Noachide laws as traditionally enumerated are; the prohibitions of idolatry, blasphemy, bloodshed, sexual sins, theft, and eating from a living animal, AS WELL AS THE INJUNCTION TO ESTABLISH A LEGAL SYSTEM ^[299]. Except for the last, all are negative, and the last itself is usually interpreted as commanding the enforcement of the other ^[300]. They are derived exegetically from divine demands addressed to Adam ^[301] and Noah ^[302], i.e., the progenitors of all mankind, and are thus regarded as universal.

���� The attempt of Finkelstein (op. cit.) to date the formulation of the seven Noachide commandments during the Hasmonean era would also suggest a rabbinic concern with the actual legal status of the non‑Jew in a sovereign Jewish state. It might even be the case that the substitution by the tanna of the school of Manasseh of emasculation and forbidden mixtures of plants for the establishment of a judicial system and blasphemy ^[303] itself reflects a concern with the regulation of the life of the resident alien already under the jurisdiction of Jewish courts. Of course, the seven commandments themselves are subject to either interpretation; e.g., the establishment of courts of justice can mean either an independent non‑Jewish judiciary and legal system or can simply bring the non‑Jew under the rubic Jewish civil law and its judicial system.

���� LIABILITY FOR VIOLATION OF THE LAWS. While committed to the principle that 'There is nothing permitted to an Israelite yet forbidden to a heathen' ^[304], the seven Noachide Laws were not as extensive as the parallel prohibitions applicable to Jews, and there are indeed situations in which a non‑Jew would be liable for committing an act for which a Jew would not be liable. As to the latter point, as a general rule, the Noachide is criminally liable for violation of any of his seven laws even though technical definition limitations would prevent liability by a Jew performing the same act. Thus a non‑Jew is liable for blasphemy ‑‑ even if only with one of the divine attributes; murder even of a foetus (Embryo): robbery ‑‑ even of less than a perutah; and the eating of flesh torn from a living animal ‑‑ even of a quantity less than the size of an olive. IN ALL THESE CASES A JEW WOULD NOT BE LIABLE ^[305]. One additional element of greater severity IS that VIOLATION OF ANY ONE OF THE SEVEN LAWS SUBJECTS THE NOACHIDE TO CAPITAL PUNISHMENT BY DECAPITATION ^[306].

The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 8, pages 648‑649, describes the Noahide Laws as follows:

"LAWS, NOACHIAN: Laws which are supposed by the Rabbis to have been binding upon mankind at large even before the revelation at Sinai and which are still binding upon non‑Jews. The term Noachian indicates the universality of these ordinances, since the whole human race was supposed to be descended from the three sons of Noah who alone survived the flood...The Noachide ARE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH COURTS OF JUSTICE IN EVERY CITY AND PROVINCE; and THESE COURTS ARE TO JUDGE THE PEOPLE WITH REGARD TO THE SIX LAWS and to warn them against the transgression of any of them. In the case of murder, if the Noachid slay a child in its mother's womb, or kill a person whose life is despaired of ('terefah'), or if he cause the death of a person by starving him or by putting him before a lion so that he can not escape, or if he slay a man in self‑defense THE NOACHID IS GUILTY OF MURDER AND MUST PAY THE DEATH‑PENALTY, although UNDER THE SAME CIRCUMSTANCES A JEW WOULD NOT BE EXECUTED ^[307].

The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, by Massa DGH, p. 1178 relates:

"Laws of Noah: Seven laws which the rabbis hold binding upon all mankind, derived from early chapters of Gen. (e.g., 9:4‑7). Six of these laws are negative, prohibiting idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, robbery, and the eating of flesh cut from a living animal. The single positive commandment is that REQUIRING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF COURTS OF JUSTICE. The 'Noachide Laws' were much discussed by European scholars in the 17th century in connection with the Laws of Nations."

When we study the Lubavitch Movement we can begin to understand the depths of the conspiracy. We can now understand why the understanding of the Millennium had to be changed. We can now more completely understand the true meaning of the multitude of quotes made by famous Rabbis and other Communists.

We can now understand the true meaning of the term Judeo‑Christianity. The Lubavitch Movement is one of the guiding influences in the concept of the Jewish Millennium and their messiah.

The Lubavitch Movement, as we have shown, teaches that the Seven Noahide Laws are applicable to all non‑Jews and that the Jews of the world are obliged to enforce those laws. The penalty for breaking those laws is DEATH BY DECAPITATION. At the same time, the Jews themselves are under Talmudic Laws and not the Noahide Laws they say. Thus, they can violate the Noahide Laws without punishment.

Now we can understand why it was so important for the doctrines of the Christian church to be changed to declare that the Laws, Statutes and Judgments of God were done away with by the advent of Christ. For the longest period of time during the Christian Kingdom, we believed and practiced the Mosaic Laws.

It was imperative that they relegate us to the Noahide Laws while only the Jews will keep the Talmudic Laws. The Lubavitch Movement under Rabbi Menachem Schneerson teaches from the Talmud that any Jewish man can be the messiah.

Further, they teach that the Jewish Millennium is to be ushered in at any moment with the naming of their messiah. If we combine the works of the Lubavitch Movement with the final drive for the one world movement that is now being pushed, we are seeing the final preparations for the Jewish utopia or millennium.

Do not underestimate the power of Rabbi Manachem Mendel Schneerson. He is not just another religious quack. He is one of the most powerful men in the entire world. When he speaks, people jump. Our Congress and President jumped, didn't they, when it was time to pass Public Law 102‑14?

Now we can understand what THE TERM JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY MEANS: THE SUBMISSION OF CHRISTIANITY TO THE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND RELIGIOUS PRECEPTS OF JUDAISM. The Economic Factor in the Conspiracy. The proposed Jewish Millennium must have an economic system. The Christian Kingdom of God here on Earth had an economic system and it was called money capitalism. There is a vast difference between the two systems.

They speak of high and lofty morals BUT WHERE ARE THEY? How did we wind up with sex execution in schools; with Queers and perverts handing out Condoms in the schools; pornographic stores; filthy movies on the screen and on television; free love; etc.?

Why do we have fourth generation families on welfare? where is this,

"MOTIVATING IMPULSE FOR THE WELFARE OF THE COMMON MAN?"

Some of the greatest philosophers of recent times, and those the Talmudic system hates with a passion, give us the clues.

Oswald Spengler, Francis Yockey and Hegel all tell us of nationalism. That means ethnic, morality, racial and tribal. Each of them taught of the one great folly of the White, Celto‑Saxon, Teutonic Christian West. As a people we have gone to the four corners of the world and brought other cultures to live with us and we have tried to make them over in our own image. We have tried to play God.

�� LUBAVITCH SECT CLAIMS ITS LEADER IS THE MESSIAH: The followers of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, claim that he is the "Messiah." As evidence of this claim, followers cite Schneerson's predictions of the fall of Communism, the exodus of Soviet Jews to Israel, and the relatively little damage suffered by Israel during Iraq's Scud attacks on the Zionist State during the so‑called Gulf War. The fact that the "Rebbe" as Schneerson is called, has recently suffered a stroke has not diminished his appeal as the "Messiah" in the eyes of his followers. This is not surprising as the Jews trout out a new "Messiah" every 200‑300 years, as can be seen by an examination of the Jewish Chronology in the Jewish Encyclopedia.

400.� Moses, the false Messiah of Crete.

721.� Appearance of the false Messiah Serenus in Syria�������������� causes many Spanish Jews to emigrate to Palestine.

1117. Persecution at Rome; appearance of a false Messiah��������� at Cordova.

1156. Jews of Persia persecuted on account of pseudo‑�������������� Messiah, David Alroy.

1502. Appearance of the pseudo‑Messiah Asher L�mmlein.

1568. Isaac Luria Levi (1534‑72), cabalist, pretends to be������������ the Messiah, son of Joseph.

1665. Shabbethai Zebi (1626‑1676) publicly accepted as the��������� Messiah at Smyrna.

1678. Appearance of the pseudo‑Messiah Mordecai Moshiah������ �of Eisenstadt.

1991. And now - Menachem Schneerson, the leader of The�������� Lubavitch Movement in the U.S. Government's hidden��������� agenda to kill off the hard-core Christian conservative���������� has now been revealed by the Randy Weaver incident���������� in Idaho and the Waco burn-out and the following�������������� information from the "Citizen's Claw" {Citizens For������������� Constitutional Law (CLAW) P.O. Box 441 Morongo������������ Valley, CA 92256 makes that charge a valid one.

���� MAKE NO MISTAKE AN AMERICAN HOLY WAR HAS BEGUN IN AMERICA: It is very hard for anyone to seriously believe there could be a deliberate program in this country DESIGNED TO DESTROY A SPECIFIC RELIGION.

But all of the evidence of recent years bears it out, such as: prayers forbidden in schools, abortion on demand, padlocking of Christian churches for refusing to take a license from the state, the jailing of Christian home-schoolers, making it a hate crime to speak out about homosexuals and its jail-time for anyone refusing to hire or to house same.

Then we have the effort by the NEA to destroy the family relationship and turn children against their parents and to charge child abuse if scolded or punished for misbehavior.

The passing out of condoms in schools to encourage all forms of perverted sex and to destroy the Christian Morals. Anyone with eyes to see should see that the Christian way of life is being deliberately targeted for extinction and the Idaho murders and the Waco burn-out is apparently the beginning of open Christian persecution in this country.

When it becomes the "policy" of a government to target or to destroy a long-established religion {genocide}, THOSE WHO PRACTICE THAT RELIGION HAVE THE MORAL AND LEGAL RIGHT TO DECLARE A HOLY WAR IN PROGRESS SO AS TO SAVE THEMSELVES.

Christians at the Elim Mission Station in Rhodesia were such convinced pacifists that, even within a few kilometers of Marxist Mozambique during a vicious war they refused to be armed. They had neither a fence nor dogs to protect them. They refused to allow the security forces to station some guards for their protection.

When terrorists visited Elim the missionaries provided them with food and medical supplies. Then one fateful night the Black terrorists {ZANLA} guerrillas, as their way of saying thank you and because of the pacifism of the Christians, herded the 9 men and women missionaries and 4 children into one of the fields. In front of the parents they hacked the children to death.

Then in front of the husbands they raped and tortured the women to death. Finally they brutally murdered the men. Yet so effectively had their pacifist doctrine neutralized them that there was no attempt at resistance. The men stood by and watched ruthless Black Terrorists butcher their loved ones. {DON'T YOU THINK FOR A MOMENT THE JEWS AND THE BLACKS IN THIS COUNTRY WILL NOT DO THE SAME FOR WHITE CHRISTIANS IN AMERICA IF THEY GET THE CHANCE!}

Again in November 1987 a similar massacre took place at New Adams Farm in Zimbabwe {Rhodesia}. Their sincere belief in pacifism disarmed these 16 Christians and made them helpless victims to a slaughter by Black Terrorists. Never forget this. WHENEVER A GOVERNMENT SENDS ITS AGENTS TO DISARM YOU, IT IS THE UNIVERSAL SIGNAL TO SHOOT WITH A CLEAR CONSCIENCE, NEEDING NO ONE'S PERMISSION BUT YOUR OWN.

The example set for at Lexington perfectly illustrates a fundamental principle of Americanism, which is: NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUNS. NEVER! Your gun is the great equalizer. Better to have one and not need it, than to need one and not have it.

In his oft-repeated speech in the Roman Senate, Cicero, in 42 B.C. spoke these words:

"A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly. The traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation,� he works secretly and alone in the night to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resists. A murderer is less to be feared."

SO IT IS WITH THE JEW, HE HAS ALWAYS BEEN A TRAITOR TO EVERY COUNTRY AND PEOPLE THAT HE HAS LIVED IN AND WITH!

"Once to every man and nation,

comes the moment to decide,

In strife of truth with falsehood

for the good or evil side.

Then the brave man chooses,

while the coward stands aside.

Til the multitudes make virtue

of faith they had denied.

Though the cause of evil prosper,

yet 'tis truth alone is strong.

Yet that scaffold sways the future

and behind the dim unknown

Standeth God within the shadow,

keeping watch above His own."

---